Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe original Roe v. Wade decision also was leaked to the press
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/05/02/leak-time-magazine-roe-wade/The original Roe v. Wade decision also was leaked to the press
By James D. Robenalt
Today at 11:48 p.m. EDT
While it may be the case, as Politico states, that no draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending, it is not true that rulings have never been given to journalists before the announcement of the decision by the court. In fact, the result in Roe v. Wade itself was leaked by a Supreme Court clerk to a Time magazine reporter in January 1973. The issue of Time, with an article titled The Sexes: Abortion on Demand, appeared on newsstands hours before the decision was announced by Justice Harry Blackmun.
The Supreme Court clerk who leaked the story, Larry Hammond, told me about it when I interviewed him for my book January 1973: Watergate, Roe v. Wade, Vietnam, and the Month That Changed America Forever.
Hammond clerked for Justice Lewis Powell and played an important role in convincing Powell that the viability standard (when a fetus could live outside the womb) was the most supportable line to draw in determining when a state may not regulate a womans right to an abortion. Powell privately convinced Justice Harry A. Blackmun and ultimately a 7-to-2 majority to adopt the viability standard, and that has been at the heart of Roe and later Casey, which now appear to be on the verge of being reversed.
Hammond confided in an acquaintance he knew from the University of Texas School of Law that the Roe ruling was forthcoming. The acquaintance, a Time staff reporter named David Beckwith, was given the information on background and was supposed to write about it only once the opinion came down from the court. A slight delay in the ruling, however, resulted in an article that appeared in the issue of the magazine that hit newsstands a few hours before the opinion was read on Jan. 22, 1973.
Chief Justice Warren Burger was livid. The Supreme Court has always jealously guarded its opinions, and secrecy is critical to maintaining an evenhanded approach to dispensing justice. There are obvious and profound consequences if litigants and the public are tipped off to the result in a case before it has been formally announced and adopted.
...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 951 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The original Roe v. Wade decision also was leaked to the press (Original Post)
dalton99a
May 2022
OP
Deuxcents
(16,190 posts)1. Interesting.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)2. No, stop. 73 was a timing issue this is Roberts trying to blunt the blow against the USSC knowing ..
... he has MAGA political operatives on his court paint the court in a negative light.
This is a leak of 2 months not 2 hours