Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTF? Smelvis' lawyers ask for additional language on the election-related chargey (Original Post) malaise May 21 OP
More intrepidity May 21 #1

intrepidity

(7,508 posts)
1. More
Tue May 21, 2024, 02:54 PM
May 21
Merchan proposes language to clarify on election-related charge

Lisa Rubin and Kyla Guilfoil

Judge Merchan proposes leaving in this sentence: “If the payment would have been made even in the absence of the candidacy, the payment should not be treated as a contribution.”

Trump's lawyer Emil Bove says that is an accurate recitation of the “irrespective rule” but they want to offer examples to the jury from the FEC’s prior application of the rule.

Merchan said that he is reserving decision, but his inclination is to use some of each side’s language.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WTF? Smelvis' lawyers as...