Trump Hid 'Fraud' on Inheritance for Years, Niece Tells Judge
Source: Bloomberg News
Erik Larson 10 hrs ago
(Bloomberg) -- Donald Trumps niece is balking at the former presidents claim that she waited too long to file her multi-million dollar fraud suit against him, saying she would have sued sooner if he hadnt covered his tracks so well.
Mary Trump on Friday asked a judge to deny Donald Trumps motion to dismiss the suit, which she filed in September against her uncle and his siblings, Robert Trump and Maryanne Trump Barry. She claims they conspired to skim tens of millions of dollars off her stake in the family business for decades after her father died and left them as her fiduciaries.
The suit by the daughter of Donald Trumps late older brother, Fred Trump Jr., is one of several serious legal threats the former president faces as a private citizen. If the case in New York state court in Manhattan survives, he could be deposed under oath by the end of the year or early 2022.
The fight may hinge on New Yorks statute of limitations, which is two years from the time a victim discovered the fraud, or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. Donald Trump, Maryanne Trump and the estate of Robert Trump, who died in August, argue their niece could have sued much earlier based on documents they handed over in other legal disputes, including a bitter court fight over the family patriarchs 1999 will.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-hid-fraud-on-inheritance-for-years-niece-tells-judge/ar-BB1e3qos?li=BBnb7Kz
bucolic_frolic
(43,127 posts)She has skin in the game if she can pull the correct legal maneuvers
apnu
(8,754 posts)Our legal system is broken and broken intentionally to benefit the rich and powerful. Mary Trump has a gigantic mountain to climb.
no_hypocrisy
(46,080 posts)It's arguing about time limitations, not validity of the claim.
cstanleytech
(26,281 posts)mobeau69
(11,140 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)...spending all the time and money necessary to defend against a more complicated underlying accusation. It's normal for anyone to look for the easy ways out before the harder ones, regardless of guilt or innocence.
riversedge
(70,186 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,732 posts)guilty until all attempts to show innocence are exhausted.
orangecrush
(19,522 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,732 posts)Appreciated.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)in her book. She had a lawyer, but, iirc, he was connected to her because the lawyer had also worked for Fred Sr. I can't recall all the details, but it didn't seem like she had the greatest lawyer in 1999. Then the NYT reporters approached her for a story. She ended up getting all the documents that were left from her last atty and giving them to the NYT. She's said she didn't know what was in all the boxes or understand what they showed. It was only after the NYT went through them and wrote their blockbuster story on the Trump family finances that she fully understood how she and her brother had been cheated.
iluvtennis
(19,846 posts)cheated Mary trump and her brother out of the percentage of the estate that there father (Fred Jr) would have received had he been living.
FakeNoose
(32,628 posts)Mary's aunt is the last one who could testify and provide evidence that Freddy's daughter Mary (and her brother) were cheated out of their father's share of the estate. But if Auntie Maryanne were to do that, it would cost her as well as Donald because they both benefited from the fraud.
Last minute tampering of the will (before the death of father Fred) would have been witnessed by someone in the family. I'm guessing it was Auntie Maryanne and her mother Mary. Besides Donald, who did the tampering.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Id hope she would tell the truth under oath about the shenanigans Donny pulled to cheat Mary out of her fair share of the family money,
FakeNoose
(32,628 posts)However, she's also complicit in the fraud. And she's a Trump, so ...
oldsoftie
(12,530 posts)So they're saying "we gave her enough info YEARS ago that we were being fraudulent, she should have sued then"?
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)nt
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)illustrates this kind off fraudulent court filing and statute of limitations nonsense very well. In the end, the lawyers get everything and the family gets bupkes.
It's a slog of a read, but I thought it was worth reading.
rsdsharp
(9,165 posts)Basically it states that a statute of limitations doesnt begin to run until the plaintiff has sufficient knowledge of the facts to realize they have a cause of action, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered the facts.
Its often invoked in fraud cases where the potential defendant has concealed relevant facts. Her problem is that she said in her book that she discovered the facts when she got documents from her attorney to give to the NY Times. I think its going to be hard to argue she couldnt have discovered the facts. Her lawyer had the facts in his possession. He apparently didnt review them sufficiently when advising her to accept the settlement.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)Love to see her win her case
Martin68
(22,791 posts)sister. Of course, it does not sink to the level of being responsible for 500,000 Covid deaths, an insurrection against the US government, or keeping kids in cages.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)Then it was entirely by accident, and I'm sure he immediately tried to screw the other party over as soon as he found out about it.