Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,413 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 01:29 PM Apr 22

Review of UN agency helping Palestinian refugees found Israel did not express concern about staff

Last edited Mon Apr 22, 2024, 05:04 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: AP

Updated 4:27 PM EDT, April 22, 2024


UNITED NATIONS (AP) — An independent review of the neutrality of the U.N. agency helping Palestinian refugees found that Israel never expressed concern about anyone on the staff lists it has received annually since 2011. The review was carried out after Israel alleged that a dozen employees of the agency known as UNRWA had participated in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks.

In a wide-ranging 48-page report released Monday, the independent panel said UNRWA has “robust” procedures to uphold the U.N. principle of neutrality, but it cited serious gaps in implementation, including staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks used in schools the agency runs with “problematic content” and staff unions disrupting operations. It makes 50 recommendations to improve UNRWA’s neutrality.

From 2017 to 2022, the report said, the annual number of allegations of neutrality being breached at UNRWA ranged from seven to 55. But between January 2022 and February 2024, U.N. investigators received 151 allegations, most related to social media posts “made public by external sources,” it said.

In a key section on the neutrality of staff, the panel, which was led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna, said UNRWA shares lists of staff with host countries for its 32,000 staff, including about 13,000 in Gaza. But it said Israeli officials never expressed concern and informed panel members it did not consider the list “a screening or vetting process” but rather a procedure to register diplomats.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-unrwa-united-nations-28a63ddef23efdc4b050b0bcbdb587ff



Link to UN NEWS page - https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148801

Link to UN REPORT page - [link:https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/independent-review-mechanisms-and-procedures-ensure-adherence-unrwa-humanitarianIndependent Review of Mechanisms and Procedures to Ensure Adherence by UNRWA to the Humanitarian Principle of Neutrality]

Link to REPORT (PDF) - https://www.unrwa.org/sites/default/files/content/resources/unrwa_independent_review_on_neutrality.pdf


Article updated.

Previous article -

Updated 1:29 PM EDT, April 22, 2024


UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- An independent review of the neutrality of the U.N. agency helping Palestinian refugees found that Israel never expressed concern about anyone on the staff lists it has received annually since 2011. The review was carried out after Israel alleged that a dozen employees of the agency known as UNRWA had participated in Hamas' Oct. 7 attacks.

In a wide-ranging 48-page report released Monday, the independent panel said UNRWA has "robust" procedures to uphold the U.N. principle of neutrality, but it cited serious gaps in implementation, including staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks used in schools the agency runs with "problematic content" and staff unions disrupting operations.

From 2017 to 2022, the report said the annual number of allegations of neutrality being breached at UNRWA ranged from seven to 55. But between January 2022 and February 2024, U.N. investigators received 151 allegations, most related to social media posts "made public by external sources," it said.

In a key section on the neutrality of staff, the panel, which was led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna, said UNRWA shares lists of staff with host countries for its 32,000 staff, including about 13,000 in Gaza. But it said Israeli officials never expressed concern and informed panel members it did not consider the list "a screening or vetting process" but rather a procedure to register diplomats.



Original article -

Updated 12:51 PM EDT, April 22, 2024


UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- An independent review of the neutrality of the U.N. agency helping Palestinian refugees found that Israel never expressed concern about anyone on the staff lists it has received annually since 2011. The review was carried out after Israel alleged that a dozen employees of the agency known as UNRWA had participated in Hamas' Oct. 7 attacks.

In a wide-ranging 48-page report released Monday, the independent panel said UNRWA has "robust" procedures to uphold the U.N. principle of neutrality, but it cited serious gaps in implementation, including staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks with "problematic content" and staff unions disrupting operations.

From 2017 to 2022, the report said the annual number of allegations of neutrality being breached at UNRWA ranged from 7 to 55. But between January 2022 and February 2024 U.N. investigators received 151 allegations, most related to social media posts "made public by external sources," it said.

In a key section on the neutrality of staff, the panel, which was led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna, said UNRWA shares lists of staff with host countries for its 32,000 staff, including about 13,000 in Gaza. But it said Israeli officials never expressed concern and informed panel members it did not consider the list "a screening or vetting process" but rather a procedure to register diplomats.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Review of UN agency helping Palestinian refugees found Israel did not express concern about staff (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 22 OP
Did the review find anything on UNRWA expressing concern about the people they were employing? Beastly Boy Apr 22 #1
I hate AP BumRushDaShow Apr 22 #2
AP is not entirely useless Beastly Boy Apr 22 #4
They have many stringers out there BumRushDaShow Apr 22 #5
This is lame JI7 Apr 22 #3
It should be noted that the investigation relied upon a single NGO moniss Apr 22 #6

Beastly Boy

(9,419 posts)
1. Did the review find anything on UNRWA expressing concern about the people they were employing?
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 03:04 PM
Apr 22

Who was doing the vetting and the hiring anyway?

Did the AP editors even notice the most consequential finding of the review that "cited serious gaps in implementation, including staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks with “problematic content” and staff unions disrupting operations"? They must have, since they made some effort to bury it in a long sentence, following a "but".

AP is getting increasingly desperate in their search for halfass palatable headlines to solicit one-sided knee-jerk reactions. Well, in their defense, they know their customer base, and there are less respectable ways to make tons of profits.

BumRushDaShow

(129,413 posts)
2. I hate AP
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 03:22 PM
Apr 22

but it is venerated here for whatever reason.

This is why I include links to press releases and reports so people can actually read for themselves.

Beastly Boy

(9,419 posts)
4. AP is not entirely useless
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 04:36 PM
Apr 22

Since they have no one other than the third rate TASS to compete in the Far East markets, their reports on the region are fairly informattive. But in the Middle East, where they have to compete for business with the likes of Al Jazeera, they must aggressively play up to their intended audiences or perish.

It's business, nothing personal.

BumRushDaShow

(129,413 posts)
5. They have many stringers out there
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 04:56 PM
Apr 22

but they will also do story blasts to the outlets that subscribe to their wire service and those outlets will publish them right away, often WAY before AP finally gets the story up on their own website. And then they continually change their headlines and story content obsessively (which is not good for LBN purposes).

moniss

(4,274 posts)
6. It should be noted that the investigation relied upon a single NGO
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 07:07 PM
Apr 22

for the review regarding textbooks etc. Their name is IMPACT-SE. That same NGO previously found problems with the textbooks in Israeli schools also. This entire subject is one that has been a problem for decades and decades also. There have been several different reviews of both by different organizations over the years. Each group, Israelis and Palestinians, typically more or less pooh-pooh the report critical of them while pointing to the other. Various NGO's/professors critique the various NGO's about methodology/criteria/interpretation/personnel/scope/thoroughness etc. I did a post about this whole thing sometime back last year I think. I could be wrong about the date.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Review of UN agency helpi...