General Discussion

maxrandb

(15,478 posts) Thu Jan 12, 2023, 02:26 PM Jan 2023

108

Wow! Justice can surely act quickly [View all]

when they are investigating a Democrat...

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow! Justice can surely act quickly [View all] maxrandb Jan 2023 OP

with leaks. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #1

right ?! uponit7771 Jan 2023 #36

lol what does this even mean? Beautiful Disaster Jan 2023 #2

+100 sinkingfeeling Jan 2023 #3

not exactly.... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #5

Well... Beautiful Disaster Jan 2023 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #42

Operative words being "after it was made public." W_HAMILTON Jan 2023 #7

Thank you! secondwind Jan 2023 #40

I think this is smart. Takes an arrow out of the GOP quiver. Raven123 Jan 2023 #4

Like John Durham? I don't think so. Unless there is compelling evidence of intent or obstruction, JohnSJ Jan 2023 #6

I'm an optimist. I believe the SC will rapidly conclude neither occurred Raven123 Jan 2023 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #48

I somehow doubt wryter2000 Jan 2023 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #43

Are you saying Garland is acting based on politics? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2023 #9

Absolutely he is. W_HAMILTON Jan 2023 #10

+++ JohnSJ Jan 2023 #26

THIS !!!! ☝🏾☝🏾☝🏾 uponit7771 Jan 2023 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #51

Everything you said, Chin. onecaliberal Jan 2023 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #56

Yes. He is choosing the apolitical path, which in itself is political Raven123 Jan 2023 #13

Yes. Marius25 Jan 2023 #14

Yes! He is ruining the SOTU address. No respect! Not 90 days out! GreenWave Jan 2023 #50

Fuuuuuccccckkkkk! Yooooouuuuu! Garland! Ray Bruns Jan 2023 #22

+1000. (nt) Paladin Jan 2023 #35

A new "beat up Garland" complaint....refreshing. brooklynite Jan 2023 #8

Do you have an actual complaint about the subject matter? W_HAMILTON Jan 2023 #11

The OP doesn't compare the speed of one investigation to another. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #30

No complaint is needed, it's just another drive-by suck-up defense. FoxNewsSucks Jan 2023 #44

If a statement of fact "beats up Garland," perhaps your vision of Garland is skewed. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #25

I see no statement of fact in the OP. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #31

I expect Garland will personally sarisataka Jan 2023 #12

Fine with me wryter2000 Jan 2023 #16

No t's to dot, or I's to cross I guess. No reason to move carefully. onecaliberal Jan 2023 #18

exactly what I thought. And they will convict Joe if impeached even with Dems in Senate. Evolve Dammit Jan 2023 #19

The Senate convicts and the fascists don't have the votes to convict anyone after impeachment. Thomas Hurt Jan 2023 #20

We shall see. Evolve Dammit Jan 2023 #32

In the absence of evidence of criminal intent to take and keep classified documents, Lonestarblue Jan 2023 #21

Perhaps to establish absence of evidence in the absence of appearance of partisanship? Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #29

Exactly. BlueCheeseAgain Jan 2023 #41

Seems to be a CYA move by the DOJ. rubbersole Jan 2023 #23

This. It's all about track record. calimary Jan 2023 #28

Because the prosecutor who was handling the case (Lausch) had already handed in Bev54 Jan 2023 #27

Whether the perception of partisanship is correct or not is doesn't matter. housecat Jan 2023 #33

If Biden is the honest guy I think he is, then the contrast between himself and Trump will be clear lees1975 Jan 2023 #34

We wouldn't want Fox News to make a big stink d_b Jan 2023 #38

There is cause for an investigation. Septua Jan 2023 #39

You realize that a special counsel was appointed just days after Trump declared his candidacy onenote Jan 2023 #45

No, I wish either 1) Smith had been appointed with the same alacrity iemanja Jan 2023 #46

The reason Smith was appointee was because Trump announced he was running. onenote Jan 2023 #47

Many here seem to misunderstand the role of a special counsel FBaggins Jan 2023 #52

How did it act quickly? FBaggins Jan 2023 #53

NFK n/t librechik Jan 2023 #55