Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

michigandem58

(1,044 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 06:23 PM Aug 2013

Did the British Have Good Reason to Detain Greenwald's Partner? [View all]

...So on the one hand, Greenwald's partner, David Miranda, is an uninvolved bi-stander. But on the other Miranda was carrying documents on his trip to Berlin for Laura Poitras, Greenwald's colleague in reporting the Snowden stories. The Guardian - Greenwald's employer - paid for the trip.

And that, fellow traveler, brings us to what could be the real reason Greenwald and his employer are trying to make this an international incident and concentrating fire on the British authorities. In public, they may be focusing on the fact of the detention, but in private, they are soiling their undergarments not over the detention itself, but over this:

David Miranda, the partner of Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, was held for nearly the maximum time authorities are allowed to detain individuals under the Terrorism Act’s Schedule 7, which authorizes security agencies to stop and question people at borders. Greenwald said Mranda’s cellphone, laptops and memory sticks were confiscated.

Now, Greenwald of course claims that this was a blatant attempt to intimidate journalism. Except, what if it wasn't? What if the equipment seized contains evidence of criminal activity?...

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2013/08/why-british-may-have-had-good-reason-to.html

84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Then ... drum roll ... GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #1
Wrong. BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #3
And yet rarely any of the few detained under this law were held for the joeybee12 Aug 2013 #4
+1 Blunt and to the point Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #11
I don't know that they had a good reason, but not pressing charges immediately pnwmom Aug 2013 #15
It will take some time Cryptoad Aug 2013 #16
Cryptoad has declared it. go west young man Aug 2013 #29
Careful Cryptoad Aug 2013 #43
Now you've declared me hateful. go west young man Aug 2013 #58
No Cryptoad Aug 2013 #68
It makes no difference, they are going to regret it, in fact they already do. nt bemildred Aug 2013 #2
I doubt that Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #12
Maybe, they are pretty stupid, like I said. bemildred Aug 2013 #14
REally,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #17
Really. nt bemildred Aug 2013 #21
This is going to be interesting. GG & Assange can have it both ways. Assange can break the law &.. Tarheel_Dem Aug 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Aug 2013 #41
Well,...what IF this was all part of a plan? Segami Aug 2013 #6
I've been wondering about that. A honey trap. bemildred Aug 2013 #7
They have his electronics. It's not a stretch to consider that they could plant NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #8
And it's not a stretch to think that his electronics already had evidence, especially since........ George II Aug 2013 #33
Yep, that's also a possibility. One thing is for sure though. NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #45
Greenwald admitted that Miranda had stolen docs on him. If I were trafficking in stolen stuff, uhnope Aug 2013 #9
Actually, he claims the exact opposite. Luminous Animal Aug 2013 #18
whaaat? Where do you get that? Here's what I'm talking about: uhnope Aug 2013 #20
Yeah, that runs counter to the idea that this guy was just just his partner. BenzoDia Aug 2013 #47
provide the link. grasswire Aug 2013 #56
"... Mr. Miranda was in Berlin to deliver documents related to Mr. Greenwald’s investigation struggle4progress Aug 2013 #61
Good links, good catch. May use on my show next week. nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #72
your post is totally fraudulent. grasswire Aug 2013 #57
Lol,. what if reporters, reporting, was a "terrorist activity"? What if freedom was a lie?!?!? Civilization2 Aug 2013 #10
+1 nt snappyturtle Aug 2013 #76
I stopped reading at "fellow traveler". neverforget Aug 2013 #13
Yeaaaahhh....... No they didn't. Fearless Aug 2013 #19
How about Cryptoad Aug 2013 #22
Nope Fearless Aug 2013 #48
The question is not Cryptoad Aug 2013 #67
They are proof of illegal data collection Fearless Aug 2013 #73
Again Cryptoad Aug 2013 #74
Which part of the Constitution says you're allowed to "pick and choose" Fearless Aug 2013 #77
Our Laws ,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #79
Aaaaaaaand here you go... Fearless Aug 2013 #84
No. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #23
Any Evidence of Criminal Activity Was of the 1% Criminals Demeter Aug 2013 #24
Then by all means... cannondale Aug 2013 #25
Start hanging Cryptoad Aug 2013 #27
Agreed cannondale Aug 2013 #31
What do you call it Cryptoad Aug 2013 #37
He wasn't. Or he would have been arrested. Fearless Aug 2013 #49
He has Cryptoad Aug 2013 #64
He has done nothing wrong Fearless Aug 2013 #69
The Law Cryptoad Aug 2013 #75
Which law says that? When did he say that? Fearless Aug 2013 #78
The have stolen Classied documents = illegal. Cryptoad Aug 2013 #81
Protected by whistleblower laws. Fearless Aug 2013 #82
Would you like to cite the law that says you can commit thief with immunity.? nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #83
NO cite needed Cryptoad Aug 2013 #80
Funny how the Brits let him go with "classified documents" neverforget Aug 2013 #63
It will take some time Cryptoad Aug 2013 #65
Whenever you enter the country, customs can search your luggage and person FarCenter Aug 2013 #38
Drive with dark skin sometime (nt) Recursion Aug 2013 #40
There will always be a portion of humanity Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #44
It's just the Brit (and, American) way of having a "debate" on intelligence gathering. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #26
No ,its called Cryptoad Aug 2013 #28
Would that "justice" apply to NSA snoops who steal secrets and our privacy? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #32
I figured you for a supporter Cryptoad Aug 2013 #34
So, what do they base their theft on? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #36
Did they Cryptoad Aug 2013 #42
Innocent until... cannondale Aug 2013 #35
No,,,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #39
I'm starting to see a trend cannondale Aug 2013 #46
So you think Cryptoad Aug 2013 #66
Perhaps one should ask the British? George II Aug 2013 #30
Of course I will rec. And for great reason: It deserves it. Thanks for sharing!! :) Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #50
None of that justifies the use of anti-terrorism laws. morningfog Aug 2013 #51
Right. Because journalism is probably criminal. DirkGently Aug 2013 #52
What the fuck is a "bi-stander"? cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #53
He's Greenwald-adjacent. Therefore: Crime. DirkGently Aug 2013 #54
Either a hi-larious knee-slappin' sexual orientation joke, or else cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #59
Passenger lists for many airports and many flights have been screened for years struggle4progress Aug 2013 #62
NO. 99Forever Aug 2013 #55
"I have many documents about England's espionage system" - G. Greenwald struggle4progress Aug 2013 #60
No Aerows Aug 2013 #70
K&R Good stuff. nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did the British Have Good...