|
admiration for General Clark, this stance really disturbs me. The things that have been taught at the SOA are well-known to those who have done the research on it, instruction books have been made public and the texts are alarming to put it mildly.
There are three things in General Clarks record thus far that I find reason enough to support another candidate, and all of them are a direct result of his military career and training. The SOA defense is one, his comments in an article I read here recently about depleted uranium are the second, and his insistance that we can somehow "win" an unjust invasion is the third.
I don't begrudge him his view, I just can't bring myself to support it, if that makes sense?
|