Own an expensive assault rifle? Sell it or no food stamps or Medicaid .

Sounds reasonable to me. No different than a work requirement. That would affect a good number of gun humpers. Assault weapons are all very expensive.
I just love kids more.

10 replies, 1374 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

10 replies	Author	Time	Post
Own an expensive assault rifle? Sell it or no food stamps or Medicaid . (Original post)	pwb	May 2018	OP
But next it will be if you have a nice TV you have to sell that so no, I am against this	Eliot Rosewater	May 2018	#1
People can't be killed by a T V	pwb	May 2018	#2
I dont get what that has to do with your idea though. I am 1 of the MOST anti gun person here	Eliot Rosewater	May 2018	#4
+1. Or Social Security. Your FICA taxes went to pay for the destruction your gun-fetish caused	Hoyt	May 2018	#3
"Assault weapons are all very expensive."	Kotya	May 2018	#5
But this might affect a lot of rural white people!!!!	guillaumeb	May 2018	#6
They also should be required	duforsure	May 2018	#7
Income level should not be a prerequisite. I see where you are going, but.....no.	dameatball	May 2018	#8
Smash it up with a sledge hammer and it won't be worth anything.	hunter	May 2018	#9
How about turn it in or no federal benefits what so ever.	roamer65	May 2018	#10

Response to pwb (Original post)

Sun May 20, 2018, 03:26 PM

Eliot Rosewater (28,372 posts)

1. But next it will be if you have a nice TV you have to sell that so no, I am against this

As long as those guns are technically legal, and due to the unconstitutional decision by the filthy prick Scalia, they are, we have to treat them like anything else.

Reply to this post

Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Sun May 20, 2018, 03:29 PM

pwb (8,458 posts)

2. People can't be killed by a T V

Wow

Reply to this post

Response to pwb (Reply #2)

Sun May 20, 2018, 03:32 PM

Eliot Rosewater (28,372 posts)

4. I dont get what that has to do with your idea though. I am 1 of the MOST anti gun person here

I am the one who repeatedly says scalia violated the constitution with Heller and I am the one who repeatedly says we need to get rid of all guns including for police

I guess I didnt understand the context you were using. I was thinking logically, legally. I am just as emotional as you are on this also, believe me...probably should have said nothing, me I mean

Reply to this post

Response to pwb (Original post)

Sun May 20, 2018, 03:31 PM

Hoyt (54,770 posts)