HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Sarah - Do You Really Thi...

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 03:08 PM

Sarah - Do You Really Think People In The WH Would Own Up To Their Conversations With....

Woodward? Why would they when asked - tell the truth that they did in fact tell Woodward what he says they told him when he interviewed them. And why do you believe them when they say they didn't say the things that Woodward attributed to them in his book.

It seems to me Sarah - that they have more reason to lie to the president - because they don't want to lose their job. Why would they tell the truth and implicate themselves?

Is the president that gullible that he believes that they are telling him the truth?
I would think that he'd be more paranoid than ever now that Woodward's book and this OpEd are out there for everyone to read.

3 replies, 723 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Sarah - Do You Really Think People In The WH Would Own Up To Their Conversations With.... (Original post)
global1 Sep 2018 OP
global1 Sep 2018 #1
dem4decades Sep 2018 #2
brewens Sep 2018 #3

Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 03:23 PM

1. If Kelly & Mattis Are Part Of This Resistance As Stated In The NYT OpEd.....

and they feel that they are serving a purpose in the WH to contain Trump - doesn't it make sense that they would lie to the president and say that they are on his side and that they didn't make the comments that are attributed to them in Woodward's book?

If they told the truth and lost their jobs - then there would be no one to contain Trump. So they did the patriotic thing and lied to the president.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 03:30 PM

2. She continues to define despicable on every occasion she speaks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 05:35 PM

3. They pretty much gave away that what was in the op-ed was true. By slamming the rats and

going after them, it means they know they actually had rats. The best action would have been to say that was all false, and couldn't have come from The White Supremacy House.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread