Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 09:06 AM Aug 2012

What a difference a (biased) pollster makes.

From electoral-vote.com, today's map with all polls factored in:



If you take Rasmussen out of the picture:



Take Rasmussen out, and Obama jumps from 297 to 347 electoral votes. Romney drops from 212 to 191.

I wonder what it would look like if you took just-as-biased "Purple Strategies" out as well.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What a difference a (biased) pollster makes. (Original Post) Pab Sungenis Aug 2012 OP
Interesting contrast! ailsagirl Aug 2012 #1
Surprised that NM goes from Dark Blue to Light Blue w/ Rasmussen OUT 66 dmhlt Aug 2012 #2
K&R The NC swing is pretty major BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #3
The Iowa shift is even more significant. Pab Sungenis Aug 2012 #4
True although NC has more than twice as many electoral votes. BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #5

BumRushDaShow

(128,459 posts)
5. True although NC has more than twice as many electoral votes.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 10:18 AM
Aug 2012

Since Iowa neighbors Illinois, it seems to me that it would not be as much a toss-up due to the President's current Midwest roots.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What a difference a (bias...