Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"A technical violation of the bribery statute..." (Original Post) brooklynite Nov 2019 OP
There's bribery, and then there's "bribery." dchill Nov 2019 #1
Now in "Okay it was a crime, but not really a crime" phase. Next "OK really a crime but he's prez!" Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2019 #2

dchill

(38,320 posts)
1. There's bribery, and then there's "bribery."
Wed Nov 20, 2019, 02:47 PM
Nov 2019

And THEN there's "'"'"bribery."'"'"

It's all bribery, Ange.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,786 posts)
2. Now in "Okay it was a crime, but not really a crime" phase. Next "OK really a crime but he's prez!"
Wed Nov 20, 2019, 03:38 PM
Nov 2019

Shades of Nixon "It's not a crime if the President does it".

In the context of American national security, Nixon replied: "Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." So expect there now to be a fabricated National Security excuse.


Oops. Vindman is/was a National Security Council member in the White House.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"A technical violation of...