Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,741 posts)
Wed Jul 15, 2020, 01:41 PM Jul 2020

How the Electoral College Is Tied to Slavery and the Three-Fifths Compromise

White supremacy is systemic. It lives in policies like law-and-order policing and access to public goods and services. It thrives in politics with systems that Americans rely on to elect leaders, like the electoral college, a process originally designed to protect the influence of white slave owners, which is still used today to determine presidential elections.

At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, state delegates came together to draft what would become the U.S. Constitution, establishing the rule of law for the newly founded United States of America. The country, still in its infancy, had liberated itself from the colonial rule of Great Britain’s King George III in the American Revolution.

With George Washington presiding, the delegates discussed the current state of affairs among the 13 states governed under the Articles of Confederation, which was proving insufficient in maintaining federal governance among the states. At the urging of Virginia Delegate James Madison and others, they began to draft a new national constitution, which would design the role and power of the new government, including elections of head of state. But steeped in the throws of the slave trade, and a little less than 100 years before the Civil War, there was already a divide between the interests of northern and southern states.

The idea of a simple popular-vote election struck fear in delegates from slaveholding states because while their states boasted large populations, much of the populace was comprised of enslaved black people who could not vote. By contrast, northern states had smaller populations with a greater number of eligible voters (read: white, male, and generally property-owning).

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/electoral-college-slavery-three-fifths-compromise-history

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the Electoral College Is Tied to Slavery and the Three-Fifths Compromise (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 OP
Teen Vogue has my admiration for educating its young readers Hekate Jul 2020 #1
I agree customerserviceguy Jul 2020 #2
Proofreading when auto-correct was born, and copy editors retired Hekate Jul 2020 #3
Maybe customerserviceguy Jul 2020 #4
The article is totally backwards on three fifths rule unc70 Jul 2020 #5

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
2. I agree
Wed Jul 15, 2020, 02:31 PM
Jul 2020

but I hope they're not learning spelling from Teen Vogue, it's "throes" not "throws".

It seems that the fine art of proofreading has completely been done away with lately.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
4. Maybe
Wed Jul 15, 2020, 02:37 PM
Jul 2020

auto-correct can be trained to recognize when an author uses a word that is not commonly in use, and provides a pop-up that gives a variety of choices WITH definitions. "Throes" is such a word.

unc70

(6,109 posts)
5. The article is totally backwards on three fifths rule
Wed Jul 15, 2020, 03:11 PM
Jul 2020

The slave states would have been happy counting slaves fully in the census. That would have given them more house seats. It was the northern states who wanted to dilute the count of slaves in the census.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the Electoral College...