Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn hindsight, why didn't Petraeus catch any heat for Benghazi?
It seemed to be a secret cia facility, so shouldn't the director of the cia been more responsible?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 597 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In hindsight, why didn't Petraeus catch any heat for Benghazi? (Original Post)
GusFring
Sep 2020
OP
Might have something to do with the floppy meat tube betwixt his legs.
Act_of_Reparation
Sep 2020
#4
lame54
(35,130 posts)1. I love current events
When?
What?
(wink)
ETA: It will take me at least 11 hours to explain...
tanyev
(42,354 posts)3. Because it wasn't really about Benghazi.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)4. Might have something to do with the floppy meat tube betwixt his legs.
betsuni
(25,118 posts)6. +1
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,079 posts)5. Because it was more politically useful to focus on Obama and Hillary
Facts be damned.