General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs it possible that Romney is assuming that Trump will nominate Amy Coney Barrett, perhaps
the most extreme RWNJ on Trump's short list, and has decided to support considering her and then vote against her?
This could be seen by some as being a "loyal Republican" with enough independence to appeal to the "never-Trumpers" and some independents when he runs for POTUS in 2024.
LonePirate
(13,386 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,378 posts)so it is definitely possible, but I'm sure they will keep that panderer in line anyway.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,849 posts)They will vote every which way that it advances their agenda. F all those soft liberals who keto say I g this day would never come.
kwolf68
(7,365 posts)That would suggest RMoney has principles to actually oppose this vote. If this candidate gets to a vote it's game over. Barrett is a terrible choice. It's awesome how most people disagree with the shit she believes, but because of our sham Democracy the thinking of people in red states makes the rules for the majority of the nation. Freedom Baby!!!
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)except for rape, mother's life in danger, extreme birth defects that the child wouldn't survive anyway.
If I were in charge, only atheists could be elected representatives. Mystical fairytales have no place in public policy.
deminks
(11,006 posts)Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,606 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)his Religion. Why do people think any different.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)❤️ ~✿~❧~🌿~❧~✿~ ❤️
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)or the party and they will take it like a beaten dog and then come back later gleefully jumping around and slobbering.
As long as it is someone higher in their hierarchy they are fine with it.
I don't think they expect anyone they consider their better to respect them and they willingly forfeit any self respect at the drop of hat.