I for one was pretty disappointed with Rachel's show tonite.

[triron]

Seemed watered down it some ways that disappointed me.
Expected far better coverage of Trump's criminality on recent display and
Republican seditious behavior.

[Wounded Bear]

1. She can't hit a homer every night...

[OhNo-Really]

2. Chris Hayes spent almost 50 minutes covering The Call etc

I for one am so tired of that Orange 🍊 owning the deadlines.

If MSNBC proceeds to talk mostly about Republicans after the inauguration, I’m cancelling DirectTv

Thousands a day are dying for f’d sake!

[StarfishSaver]

4. Ok

Not sure what you new pizazzy take you expected her to bring to a day-old story that has been covered nonstop on her network and elsewhere for the last 24 hours with no new developments, but ok ...

[COLGATE4]

5. Couldn't agree more.

Starting with the first segment about the 79 year old gal who's "not afraid of yhe covid vaccine". Went downhill from there.

[JI7]

6. I didn't watch the show yet but what is wrong with that ?

[COLGATE4]

7. It was pointless and boring as hell. With all that's

occurring nationally the introductory segment is usually about topics of national interest. Not listening to an unremarkable senior citizen in New Orleans opine that she's not concerned about the Covid-19 vaccine because she "believes in science".

[JI7]

9. THe pandemic is a story of national importance

[COLGATE4]

10. Interesting how you decide to criticize my

comments without having even seen the piece in question. The lead segment wasn't about "the pandemic as a story of national importance." Nothing about, for example, the new mutant strains of the virus that are at least 70% more infectious. No, instead it was a fluff, feel-good (to Rachel) piece about a senior in New Orleans who thinks science is swell and isn't afraid of the vaccine. An "isn't that sweet?" piece of very limited value.

[orleans]

13. i get it--what you're saying. i didn't see the show but i certainly would want her to zero in on

that phone call rather than the puff piece story

that kinda surprises me--rachel is a political news junkie (or i assume she is) so... wth?

[malaise]

17. She did and what she covered was barely mentioned by others n/t

[lunatica]

8. She might be gearing up for tomorrow's election

She loves covering elections.

[electric_blue68]

14. She said she was bringing her sleeping bag for...

tomorrow night's GA voting coverage just in case. 👍

[nancy1942]

11. We can have different opinions on what's interesting.

I thought the woman from New Orleans was a good human interest piece; Amy Klobuchar is always interesting, and tonight she gave me a little bit of hope for a week that I'm really dreading. If I find a news show that I find boring I just turn it off. I don't feel like I have to point out to everyone that I was disappointed with it and found it watered down.
But that's just my opinion and you're certainly entitled to yours.

[MerryBlooms]

12. Did you watch the Stacy Abrams interview?

The opening? I'm at the halfway mark, and so far, I think her show has been very good.

[Nexus2]

15. I thought the show was fine tonight.

Informative and interesting, the elderly lady in the opening was a good human interest piece and positive message to those who are still hesitant about taking the vaccines.

[malaise]

16. Rachel rarely gives Killa Con time on her program

Loved how she made the connection between the immediate resignation of the North Georgia US Attorney and Killa Con's comments about him. I also loved her interview with Stacey.
I thought she covered the traitors very well with Amy Klobuchar
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show