Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

soothsayer

(38,601 posts)
1. he chief investigator delicately tries to tell him he shouldn't be talking to her and he just barrel
Wed Mar 10, 2021, 06:29 PM
Mar 2021

?s=21


Quinta Jurecic
@qjurecic
·
Mar 10, 2021
the moment where the chief investigator delicately tries to tell him he shouldn't be talking to her and he just barrels right over her is really something

"I know you're a very busy, very important man—quite frankly, I'm shocked that you would take time" to call—and Trump just completely ignores her (to talk about Jan 6)

sop

(9,945 posts)
7. Prosecutors like to say "a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich" without too much effort.
Wed Mar 10, 2021, 06:59 PM
Mar 2021

Let's see if this grand jury can indict a Hamberder.

tanyev

(42,358 posts)
11. It still mystifies me why a person with integrity would even take the call.
Wed Mar 10, 2021, 07:36 PM
Mar 2021

“Sir, it’s completely inappropriate for me to have a conversation with you right now. Good day.”

Donnie doesn’t respond to ‘delicately’.

msfiddlestix

(7,265 posts)
5. There ya have it with the icing on top
Wed Mar 10, 2021, 06:35 PM
Mar 2021

That's freakin' awesome.

I've been a little bit worried that "intent" would be to difficult a hurdle in this particular exchange/evidence.

I feel like that phrase dashes any lingering doubt in that regard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Recording of Trump Phone ...