General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden's big-spending agenda, brought to you by the Trump era
Aaron Blake 3 hrs ago
-snip-
A tweet before Bidens address Wednesday night has stuck with me. It came from Gregg Nunziata, a former GOP Senate aide.
Zero Trump fans will agree, but the radical lurch to the left we are witnessing is wholly attributable to Trumps choices, Nunziata said. A modicum of responsibility and none of this would be happening. Hope triggering the Left was worth it to everyone. It only cost trillions, and worse.
Whatever one thinks of Bidens proposals, Nunziata has a point about former president Donald Trumps role in laying the groundwork. Ive written before about how Trump paved the way for Bidens ambitious agenda by making the GOP revolve around him rather than any preexisting policy goals or defined ideology.
When Trump did try to guide it in a specific direction, he failed to deliver on things such as infrastructure, withdrawal from the Middle East and other priorities that might be easier for his Democratic successor to achieve. And in the meantime, Trump bulldozed whatever principled stands Republicans might attempt to make on things such as government spending.
That might be one of the most demonstrable and significant shifts in American politics in the Trump era.
A decade after Republicans responded to Barack Obamas election by launching the tea party and warning of the evils of overzealous government, there is so far no similarly fervent pushback in the electorate today. Indeed, about a quarter-century after a Democratic president declared that the era of big government is over, the new Democratic president comes into office with the electorate more in favor of big government than at any point in recent history.
And thats driven home in multiple polls.
An NBC News poll released this week showed 55 percent of Americans agreed with the statement that the government should do more to solve problems and meet the needs of people, compared with 41 percent that said it was doing too much.
Five of the six most pro-big government responses on this poll question? All in the past four years, since Trump took office. And thats in data stretching back to the mid-1990s, when President Bill Clinton decided he needed to emphasize that he wasnt some kind of big-government liberal.
Gallups data also bear this out. Its poll in late 2020 toward the end of Trumps presidency showed similar numbers as the new NBC poll. Fifty-four percent said the government should do more to solve problems, compared with 41 percent who preferred that things largely be left to individuals and businesses. This was also the most pro-government response since the Clinton years.
Heres how that looks:
chart: Gallup data on the role of government. (Aaron Blake/Gallup)Gallup data on the role of government. (Aaron Blake/Gallup)
The only other time in which pro-government views were nearly as popular? After 9/11.
Thats another point: the impact of crises on this question. Its too simple to say this is all about Trump. The Gallup poll and some others have shown significant increases in favor of government action after the coronavirus pandemic hit, for perhaps obvious reasons. NBCs data, though, show the current increase pre-dated that. And Gallup also had this question nearing some rare parity by 2019 (pre-pandemic).
Even more telling might be the low points for views of governments role. The biggest dip came around the time Clinton decided to stress his small-government bona fides. The next biggest dip came the last time we had a new Democratic president, when the tea party asserted itself. Even in 2012, Obamas reelection year, Gallups data showed Americans favoring less government rather than more by 61 to 34 percent a far cry from where we are today.
One thing you might also note from the chart above, though, is how Clinton came into office with Americans relatively split on this question. Anti-government spending views also increased as Obamas presidency wore on. In other words: It might not last for Biden. And thats doubly so given just how much spending he proposes. The huge price tags could certainly play a role in moving the needle, with some nudging by Republicans.
But arguably more so than at any point in the last three decades or longer, the soil is fertile. Republicans might indeed want to ask themselves how they allowed it to become so and how theyve compromised their ability to fight back.
more/NO PAYWALL
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-e2-80-99s-big-spending-agenda-brought-to-you-by-the-trump-era/ar-BB1gdA1B
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
underpants
(182,277 posts)The biggest is the whole government involvement vs not. Thats from the realm of historians and politicos over emphasizing Reagan in the publics mind. Yes the government for some resin is still operating under the umbrella of Reagan and Milton Friedman but Ronnie barely resonates these days. Anyone writing articles today at the most was of age when Reagan came in so this is their starting point.
A vast majority of Republican voters know Reagan like they know typewriters. The GOP attempt to at lest undercut JFK with Ronnie failed.
Clearly the numbers for government action go up after huge events - from 9/11 to Katrina to COVID to all the way back to post-Gulf War one and the military was omnipresent. The media did its best and kept the GOP horse alive after 2006.
Midnight Writer
(21,547 posts)Trump was so awful that it shocked the People into a consciousness changing paradigm?