Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho joined the three liberals in the 5-4 decision?
I cannot find it on these pages.
Thanks
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1045 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who joined the three liberals in the 5-4 decision? (Original Post)
question everything
Jun 2022
OP
It's technically a three-way-split, but Roberts counts with the five other a-holes. nt
allegorical oracle
Jun 2022
#9
Amishman
(5,541 posts)1. Roberts went in support of upholding MS's 16 wk ban, but not overturning Roe
AllaN01Bear
(17,383 posts)4. roberts needs to regain control of his court.
FBaggins
(26,697 posts)12. You should read his opinion
Just about everyone here would have called it overturning Roe if it had been the majority opinion.
Its only by comparison that he looks reasonable
question everything
(47,271 posts)5. Thanks. Talk about weaseling
AZSkiffyGeek
(10,813 posts)2. Roberts
He voted to uphold the MS law, but not to overturn Roe.
question everything
(47,271 posts)6. Thanks. Did not realize there were two decisions
AZSkiffyGeek
(10,813 posts)8. I'm not clear why there were nt
calguy
(5,223 posts)3. I thought it was a 6-3 ruling
question everything
(47,271 posts)7. See above. Two rulings.
allegorical oracle
(2,357 posts)9. It's technically a three-way-split, but Roberts counts with the five other a-holes. nt
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,645 posts)10. Dread pirate Roberts
and he got what he wanted and lost control a long time ago. His rep is Mud !
FBaggins
(26,697 posts)11. Nobody
There was a concurrence that didnt go quite as far as the courts opinion (Roberts)