Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why does Ginni's hubby put targets Griswold, Obergfel, and Lawrence but not on Loving? (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Jun 2022 OP
I didn't notice that! Nt AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2022 #1
The "Slappy" crap is racist. edhopper Jun 2022 #2
Completely disagree but we can argue that another time. Stinky The Clown Jun 2022 #3
Glad you changed it edhopper Jun 2022 #4
Well, *that's* in the Constitution. sl8 Jun 2022 #5
Personally, I think she could kick his ass,,,, KarenS Jun 2022 #6
He put out everything but this.. hmmmm Deuxcents Jun 2022 #7
Clearly not impartial Tatertot Jun 2022 #8
He's telling the fucksticks to start working on getting a case regarding those decisions maxrandb Jun 2022 #9
The point of the OP is he is blatantly self interested and self serving. Stinky The Clown Jun 2022 #10
Justices need to be asked about Loving every time a reporter can get to them. eppur_se_muova Jun 2022 #11
He's probably afraid of what Ginni would do if he mentioned Loving. Midnight Writer Jun 2022 #12

KarenS

(4,024 posts)
6. Personally, I think she could kick his ass,,,,
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 09:29 PM
Jun 2022

She's just scary.

I think he thinks he's found a way out of this relationship

Deuxcents

(15,787 posts)
7. He put out everything but this.. hmmmm
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 09:29 PM
Jun 2022

He needs replaced however they replace SC Justices. Maybe another “Never before”?

Tatertot

(94 posts)
8. Clearly not impartial
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 09:36 PM
Jun 2022

From his written opinion, Clarance Thomas is clearly not impartial and must recuse himself from any cases involving gay marriage, contraception, etc. or he should be impeached, even if the votes don’t exist to remove him from the court

maxrandb

(15,193 posts)
9. He's telling the fucksticks to start working on getting a case regarding those decisions
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 09:41 PM
Jun 2022

in front of this kangaroo court so they can take those out.

You didn't think this abortion case ended up in front of them by accident, did you?

eppur_se_muova

(36,227 posts)
11. Justices need to be asked about Loving every time a reporter can get to them.
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 10:36 PM
Jun 2022

I realize that's not often, but they do sit for occasional interviews.

If they're willing to overturn all these other precedents, why do they think Loving would be spared ? It's the same bunch of people trying to get them all struck down. Are they going to spare Loving just because one of their useful idiots would rather they didn't ?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why does Ginni's hubby pu...