Mon Aug 15, 2022, 02:11 PM

Goodheart (4,907 posts)

You know, maybe if Garland had indicted the f*cker on the 10 counts of Mueller obstruction,

as trump SHOULD HAVE BEEN almost immediately upon vacating the presidency, Garland wouldn't have had to deal with obstruction in this documents case. And maybe some national secrets would have been secured? And maybe Jared wouldn't have his $2 billion? And maybe even some lives would have been saved?

Yes, Garland seems to be playing everything correctly in THIS case, but what about those that preceded this one? Can you tell I'm not as delighted with him as some others here seem to be?

50 replies, 1774 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

50 replies	Author	Time	Post
You know, maybe if Garland had indicted the f*cker on the 10 counts of Mueller obstruction, (Original post)	Goodheart	Aug 2022	OP
I'm not "delighted" with him at all...I merely expect him to methodically do his job...	brooklynite	Aug 2022	#1
Yes a very high price has been paid because Trump was allowed to commit further crimes.	Irish_Dem	Aug 2022	#2
The AG doesn't indict, grand juries do that.	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#3
It certainly wasn't enough in the Mueller case.	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#5
It wasn't enough at the time because of the OSC policy that sitting presidents can't be indicted.	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#17
You clearly didn't read my post(s)	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#31
I did and it's wrong. See post #43.	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#47
Does the DOJ need a grand jury to charge for what Mueller has accused Benedict Donald of in	uponit7771	Aug 2022	#6
Yes. That's how the process works.	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#13
Thx	uponit7771	Aug 2022	#33
THANK YOU !!! There's no investigation that's needed with Mueller just simply charge his ass	uponit7771	Aug 2022	#4
Not doing past. Cannot change things. Can only go from here.	efhmc	Aug 2022	#7
I am certainly hoping for the best.	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#9
He Hasn't Even Been Indicted Or Charged In This Situation Either	SoCalDavidS	Aug 2022	#8
That's a good point.	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#11
He hasn't been arrested because he hasn't been charged or indicted, yet.	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#14
Yes.	Texaswitchy	Aug 2022	#10
Eighteen months. I'm guessing the people on the spy payroll list	Scrivener7	Aug 2022	#12
Gathering evidence takes time	Progressive dog	Aug 2022	#15
How did we not know that 26 boxes of documents about our most	Scrivener7	Aug 2022	#20
Are you a conspiracy theorist?	Progressive dog	Aug 2022	#22
This message was self-deleted by its author	Scrivener7	Aug 2022	#23
So using pea brain to describe conspiracy theorists	Progressive dog	Aug 2022	#25
I misread what you were saying, and I will delete. Sorry.	Scrivener7	Aug 2022	#26
Oh, is it "Garland sucks" week again?	mcar	Aug 2022	#16
Yeah, the Mierda Loco search wasn't good enough. TFG was supposed to be hauled away	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#18
It appears to be. A whine and cheese gathering.	lamp_shade	Aug 2022	#21
Do something!	mcar	Aug 2022	#24
And that thing you did, you didn't do it soon enough! You suck.	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#27
Dead or blown spies do suck, though.	Scrivener7	Aug 2022	#28
Yeah, apparently AG Garland is getting too much accolades and some can't stand it.	MarineCombatEngineer	Aug 2022	#44
It's kind of embarrassing for those who have been whining about him	Ocelot II	Aug 2022	#46
Admitting you were wrong is a sign of maturity	mcar	Aug 2022	#49
+100. nt	MarineCombatEngineer	Aug 2022	#50
How would an indictment prevented the other things?	Kaleva	Aug 2022	#19
Billy Barr needs his comeuppance too!	czarjak	Aug 2022	#29
Too slow: investigation of everything.	Tetrachloride	Aug 2022	#30
Here's some information to save you further embarrassment:	Fiendish Thingy	Aug 2022	#32
Bill Clinton's "lies" were slam dunks? I'm just thinking TFGs issues are WAY worse than lying about	uponit7771	Aug 2022	#34
Who's talking about Clinton?	Fiendish Thingy	Aug 2022	#38
"Who's talking about Clinton" people who want a DOJ that looks non partisan, right now it doesn't.	uponit7771	Aug 2022	#41
Exactly.... is there some rule that a conviction has to be a "slam dunk"	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#39
Any smart AAG will tell you that if they don't believe a conviction will be a slam dunk	MarineCombatEngineer	Aug 2022	#45
emptywheel is entitled to his/her opinion no matter how outnumbered he is.	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#36
The DOJ rarely, if ever indicts unless they are in "slam dunk" territory	Fiendish Thingy	Aug 2022	#42
Not this again. How many times does this has to explained.	fightforfreedom	Aug 2022	#35
Did you bother to read my post?	Goodheart	Aug 2022	#37
I did read your post and it is wrong.	fightforfreedom	Aug 2022	#43
I'm encouraged by a variety of events (many recent)	Jarqui	Aug 2022	#40
I think he would have walked	dclarston13	Aug 2022	#48

Response to Goodheart (Original post)

Mon Aug 15, 2022, 02:13 PM

brooklynite (89,780 posts)

1. I'm not "delighted" with him at all...I merely expect him to methodically do his job...

...which has nothing to do with keeping the blogosphere happy.

You know, maybe if Garland had indicted the f*cker on the 10 counts of Mueller obstruction,

1. I'm not "delighted" with him at all...I merely expect him to methodically do his job...

2. Yes a very high price has been paid because Trump was allowed to commit further crimes.

3. The AG doesn't indict, grand juries do that.

5. It certainly wasn't enough in the Mueller case.

17. It wasn't enough at the time because of the OSC policy that sitting presidents can't be indicted.

31. You clearly didn't read my post(s)

47. I did and it's wrong. See post #43.

6. Does the DOJ need a grand jury to charge for what Mueller has accused Benedict Donald of in

13. Yes. That's how the process works.

33. Thx

4. THANK YOU !!! There's no investigation that's needed with Mueller just simply charge his ass

7. Not doing past. Cannot change things. Can only go from here.

9. I am certainly hoping for the best.

8. He Hasn't Even Been Indicted Or Charged In This Situation Either

11. That's a good point.

14. He hasn't been arrested because he hasn't been charged or indicted, yet.

10. Yes.

12. Eighteen months. I'm guessing the people on the spy payroll list

15. Gathering evidence takes time

20. How did we not know that 26 boxes of documents about our most

22. Are you a conspiracy theorist?

25. So using pea brain to describe conspiracy theorists

26. I misread what you were saying, and I will delete. Sorry.

16. Oh, is it "Garland sucks" week again?

18. Yeah, the Mierda Loco search wasn't good enough. TFG was supposed to be hauled away

21. It appears to be. A whine and cheese gathering.

24. Do something!

27. And that thing you did, you didn't do it soon enough! You suck.

28. Dead or blown spies do suck, though.

44. Yeah, apparently AG Garland is getting too much accolades and some can't stand it.

46. It's kind of embarrassing for those who have been whining about him

49. Admitting you were wrong is a sign of maturity

50. +100. nt

19. How would an indictment prevented the other things?

29. Billy Barr needs his comeuppance too!

30. Too slow: investigation of everything.

32. Here's some information to save you further embarrassment:

34. Bill Clinton's "lies" were slam dunks? I'm just thinking TFGs issues are WAY worse than lying about

38. Who's talking about Clinton?

41. "Who's talking about Clinton" people who want a DOJ that looks non partisan, right now it doesn't.

39. Exactly.... is there some rule that a conviction has to be a "slam dunk"

45. Any smart AAG will tell you that if they don't believe a conviction will be a slam dunk

36. emptywheel is entitled to his/her opinion no matter how outnumbered he is.

42. The DOJ rarely, if ever indicts unless they are in "slam dunk" territory

35. Not this again. How many times does this has to explained.

37. Did you bother to read my post?

43. I did read your post and it is wrong.

40. I'm encouraged by a variety of events (many recent)

48. I think he would have walked