Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo Supreme Court justices testify under oath when they testify to the Senate while being nominees?
If they are under oath then perjury charges should be forthcoming.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 427 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do Supreme Court justices testify under oath when they testify to the Senate while being nominees? (Original Post)
Eliot Rosewater
Sep 17
OP
hlthe2b
(105,399 posts)1. I remember Roberts clearly being sworn in; Gorsuch too and maybe Kavanaugh, so yes.
unblock
(53,955 posts)2. Yes they are sworn in. No they surely didn't commit actual perjury
If nothing else, they should know how to not cross that line.
haele
(13,275 posts)4. They can always say their feelings about things "evolved".
At the time, they weren't lying....
duncang
(2,979 posts)3. Most of the answers
Werent answers. It was I cant comment on a case that isnt in front of me now.
Wiz Imp
(633 posts)5. Despite that, they all definitely committed perjury
Being able to prosecute any one of them for perjury is a different story. Unfortunately, it's highly unlikely they would be able to prosecute and get a conviction.
enough
(13,430 posts)6. Yes they do but it's meaningless. Once they get into office
they are the law.
Eliot Rosewater
(32,272 posts)8. And there it is...the end of the rule of law and the SC is doing it.
They are the law...sad but true.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,091 posts)7. Under oath yes
What do you think they perjured themselves on? Proving perjury will be nearly impossible.