Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 07:02 AM Jan 2013

Canadian malpractice costs kept low

The structure of the maipractice system is one main reason, but the article didn't mention a second very important reason--people sue when they have bad outcomes because they face a lot of extra health care expenses. This does not happen in any other industrialized country because those countries guarantee health care as a human right.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/article1021977.ece

For neurosurgeons in Miami, the annual cost of medical malpractice insurance is astronomical — $237,000, far more than the median price of a house.

In Toronto, a neurosurgeon pays about $29,200 for coverage. It's even less in Montreal ($20,600) and Vancouver ($10,650).

Instead of buying insurance from a for-profit company, as most U.S. doctors do, Canadian physicians are covered through their membership in the nonprofit Canadian Medical Protective Association.

Membership fees vary only by the type of work and region of the country. All neurosurgeons in Ontario, for example, pay the same amount regardless of how many times each may have been hit with a claim.

"We don't adjust our fees based on individual experience; it's the experience of the group,'' says Dr. John Gray, the executive director. "That's what the mutual approach is all about, and it helps keep the fees down for everyone.''

Moreover, the association provides legal counsel for doctors who are sued and pays the damages, no matter how much.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. They also limit the hell out of "pain and suffering" awards, which USA does not.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 07:15 AM
Jan 2013

Save those charmers down in Florida, that is.

It's not all down to the health care costs.

From the same link:

• In 1978, the Canadian Supreme Court limited damages for pain and suffering. Adjusted for inflation, the cap now is just over $300,000. The United States has no federal cap on damages, though a few states, including Florida, have imposed them.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. And it makes not the slightest difference. Malpractice costs in Florida are as bad as elsewhere n/
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 07:21 AM
Jan 2013
 

JoeBlowToo

(253 posts)
3. Malpractice a Tiny Percentage of Health Care Costs
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 09:35 AM
Jan 2013

Malpractice a Tiny Percentage of Health Care Costs

One of the principal myths surrounding medical malpractice is its effect on overall health care costs. Medical malpractice is actually a tiny percentage of health care costs, in part because medical malpractice claims are far less frequent than many people believe.
In 2004, the CBO calculated malpractice costs amounted to “less than 2 percent of overall health care spending. Thus, even a reduction of 25 percent to 30 percent in malpractice costs would lower health care costs by only about 0.4 percent to 0.5 percent, and the likely effect on health insurance premiums would be comparably small.”
http://www.justice.org/cps/rde/justice/hs.xsl/8686.htm

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Canadian malpractice cost...