Thu Feb 5, 2015, 11:19 PM
ND-Dem (4,571 posts)
jeff bezos buys washington post, cuts employees' retirement, benefits
Jeff Bezos made his fortune fending off his employees’ attempts to organize into unions, but now that he owns the Washington Post he’s going to have to take a seat at the negotiating table, and it’s not off to a great start. Several dozen Posties, upset with Bezos’s proposed cuts to their pensions and severance pay, turned 15th and L into a picket line Thursday afternoon.
The Post, now a year into the Bezos era, wants to freeze its unionized workers’ pension plan and introduce a cash-balance model, which provides a lump sum or annuity on retirement, rather than the traditional plan which guarantees benefits regardless of market conditions. The switch only affects people hired before September 2009; newer employees will be given 401(k) retirement plans and supplemental savings accounts. Bezos’s side also proposes cutting severance benefits in half from two weeks’ pay for every year saved to just one. A flier printed by Local 32035, the union representing Post employees, suggests that employees could be let go with even less if Bezos’s proposals go through. “[The] Post thinks that an employee who served two years—doing things such as covering a hurricane, or delivering newspapers in a hurricane—should be okay with two weeks’ pay,” the flier reads. “Oh, and cake.” These are suggested changes that longtime staff writer Fredrick Kunkle, a co-chair of the local, says will turn the paper from a career destination to a “way-station” where journalists only stay for a few years before moving on. And the Post’s pension plan, unlike many other newspapers’, is relatively robust. It was $604 million ahead of its outstanding liabilities when Bezos bought the paper, a financial position earned by following some smart advice Warren Buffett offered Katherine Graham in 1975. That Bezos would try to pare back the union’s benefits comes as no shock to many Posties, though. Amazon has successfully busted every one of its employees’ unionization efforts, most recently in June when workers at a warehouse in Delaware voted against joining a union after what labor organizers called “intense pressure” from management and outside consultants. http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/post-watch/washington-post-employees-arent-too-happy-with-jeff-bezos-right-now.php
|
5 replies, 958 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
ND-Dem | Feb 2015 | OP |
pa28 | Feb 2015 | #1 | |
ND-Dem | Feb 2015 | #3 | |
williesgirl | Feb 2015 | #2 | |
ND-Dem | Feb 2015 | #4 | |
williesgirl | Feb 2015 | #5 |
Response to ND-Dem (Original post)
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 11:31 PM
pa28 (6,145 posts)
1. I've noticed the post has taken a consistently anti-labor editorial stance over the years.
Being people of such high intellectual integrity I'm sure they won't object now that their retirement security is under attack.
|
Response to pa28 (Reply #1)
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 06:07 AM
ND-Dem (4,571 posts)
3. you realize that the editorial stance is not the stance of the workers, right?
Response to ND-Dem (Original post)
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 02:06 AM
williesgirl (4,033 posts)
2. It used to be a great place to work. Mrs. Graham must be rolling
In her grave. Don Graham sold everyone out with this sale. It's sad.
|
Response to williesgirl (Reply #2)
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 06:07 AM
ND-Dem (4,571 posts)
4. wasn't warren buffett the last most recent owner?
Response to ND-Dem (Reply #4)
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 06:53 AM
williesgirl (4,033 posts)
5. Buffett never owned The Post, he had lots of stock and k
Was a good friend of the Grahams, who were the owners.
|