General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo who wants to roll back the New Deal?
By Greg Sargent August 31 at 2:09 PM
Brian Beutler has an important piece in which he raises an unsettling question: Could the next Republican president nominate one or more Supreme Court justices who would seek to restore a pre-New Deal judicial conception of liberty of contract, with the goal of undermining much of the regulatory state that many Americans take for granted today?
Beutler reports on a movement among legal-minded libertarians to rehabilitate the Lochner decision, the notorious 1905 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated a state law limiting the working hours of bakers, giving its name to the Lochner era of Supreme Court rulings in which economic regulations established by popularly elected officials were struck down as unconstitutional. The Lochner era is widely seen to have ended during the New Deal, when the Court upheld (among many other things) a state minimum wage law, concluding that liberty of contract is not an absolute right.
Sam Bagenstos, a liberal constitutional scholar at the University of Michigan, tells Beutler that a full fledged return to Lochner could ultimately undermine a whole host of economic regulations, including minimum wage, overtime, and worker safety laws and even possibly laws protecting customers from discrimination based on race.
One leading libertarian lawyer tells Beutler frankly that the goal is to invalidate much social welfare legislation at the federal level, though I would add that a Lochner restoration might invalidate a fair amount of it at the state level as well. Libertarians are frustrated with the Roberts court for its rulings preserving Obamacare decisions that have been widely interpreted as a sign of Roberts judicial restraint and deference to the elected branches and the hope is that a Republican president will appoint more unabashedly activist judges when it comes to placing limits on federal power to regulate the economy:
The hope is that this anger propels a libertarian-minded president into office and inspires him to nominate less restrained judges. The next president will likely have the opportunity to appoint at least one, and possibly as many as four Supreme Court justices. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is now 82. Stephen Breyer is 77. Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia are both 79. If one of these justices retires under a Republican president, who then appoints a Lochnerian to fill the vacancy, it will change the Court profoundly. If more than one of them steps down, the Court will become unrecognizable .
In July, the conservative columnist George Will made a provocative new demand of the next Republican president: Ask this of potential court nominees: Do you agree that Lochner correctly reflected the U.S. natural rights tradition and the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments affirmation of unenumerated rights?
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/08/31/so-who-wants-to-roll-back-the-new-deal/?
randys1
(16,286 posts)THAT'S WHO
peacebird
(14,195 posts)If the dems put her up as the nom, we WILL lose.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Republican offenses are well documented but don't forget that welfare "reform" and the repeal of Glass Steagall took place during the term of a so called Democratic president.