Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:02 AM

Looks like a good case for arbitration:

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2994787/it-careers/bank-s-severance-deal-requires-it-workers-to-be-on-call-for-two-years.html

Of course, the bank is probably in a right-to-work state, and can basically screw their employees any way they want to without being liable.

-- Mal

1 replies, 622 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

1 replies	Author	Time	Post
Looks like a good case for arbitration: (Original post)	malthaussen	Oct 2015	OP
I would imagine that	1939	Oct 2015	#1

Response to malthaussen (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:12 AM

1939 (1,683 posts)

1. I would imagine that

the severance agreements provide a lump sum severance pay and that the pay is considered to be recompense for any calls during the two years. Acceptance of the on-call provision is a condition of receiving the severance pay.

Reply to this post