HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I would think Mueller wou...

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 01:08 AM

I would think Mueller would have enough material on this administration to start

tossing out indictments by now. It's not as if there is a dearth of stuff.

It's Mueller time!!

7 replies, 1405 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply I would think Mueller would have enough material on this administration to start (Original post)
shraby Sep 2017 OP
CentralMass Sep 2017 #1
MrsCoffee Sep 2017 #6
JonLP24 Sep 2017 #2
secondwind Sep 2017 #3
Not Ruth Sep 2017 #4
MFM008 Sep 2017 #5
Javaman Sep 2017 #7

Response to shraby (Original post)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 01:35 AM

1. Ww have seen absolutely nothing happen to anyone.

Last edited Fri Sep 15, 2017, 09:12 AM - Edit history (2)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CentralMass (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 07:13 AM

6. Do you mean Watergate?

If by absolutely nothing you mean:

one presidential resignation

one vice-presidential resignation – although Agnew’s crimes were unrelated to Watergate

40 government officials indicted or jailed

H.R. Haldeman and John Erlichman (White House staff), resigned 30 April 1973, subsequently jailed

John Dean (White House legal counsel), sacked 30 April 1973, subsequently jailed

John Mitchell, Attorney-General and Chairman of the Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP), jailed

Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Liddy (ex-White House staff), planned the Watergate break-in, both jailed

Charles Colson, special counsel to the President, jailed

James McCord (Security Director of CREEP), jailed

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to shraby (Original post)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 01:40 AM

2. Grand jury investigations can take a long time

Better to be thorough rather than half-cocked. If Trump & co were poor nobodies they would have locked him up and worked it more later.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to shraby (Original post)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 04:37 AM

3. I thought two grand juries had been impaneled

and they are poring over stuff. Am I wrong about this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to shraby (Original post)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 04:42 AM

4. I thought that sealed indictments had gone out along time ago

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to shraby (Original post)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 06:40 AM

5. I think

He is very through.
Every thing proof read.
Indictments must stick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MFM008 (Reply #5)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 10:16 AM

7. +1

he has to have everything covered and supported.

even the smallest hole will allow the orange menace to slip through.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread