Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)
Sat Sep 16, 2017, 04:40 PM Sep 2017

Flood insurance and Health insurance for all

Right now, federal flood insurance is not mandatory for people living in flood-prone areas, and it is very expensive because only people (who can afford it) who are most vulnerable pay for flood insurance. People living in the flood plain where flooding is not frequent or severe probably do not feel they need this expensive insurance--premiums might cost more than the repair costs.

Making it mandatory to have flood insurance if you live in the flood plain, no matter how great your personal risk is, lowers premiums for everybody by pooling risk. Some people will benefit more than other people when it floods, but everyone would be covered, and it benefits the group for everyone to be able to afford repairs. Hence imo flood insurance for all in the flood plain makes a lot of sense.

Spreading the risk for medical costs works the same way. Some will end up paying more in premiums than they otherwise would, but all would be covered. The group--our country--benefits when all its citizens receive health care.

Whether it's fine-tuning ACA or single-payer, the larger the risk pool, the better off we all are.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Flood insurance and Health insurance for all (Original Post) cyclonefence Sep 2017 OP
Difficult part of making flood insurace mandatory under current times. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #1
living in a flood zone is a personal choice nt msongs Sep 2017 #2
I can't say much about Florida and Georgia. Igel Sep 2017 #3
 

Weekend Warrior

(1,301 posts)
1. Difficult part of making flood insurace mandatory under current times.
Sat Sep 16, 2017, 04:59 PM
Sep 2017

There are two main groups living in flood zones. The very wealthy and the poor. I'm simply talking Florida here but that holds true for other states as well. Don't take my comment as absolute. It's not meant to be.

Currently it wouldn't lower premiums for everyone. It would lower premiums for the wealthy and take others premiums from zero to something. Flood insurance is mandatory in most areas by those holding the mortgage.

Igel

(35,197 posts)
3. I can't say much about Florida and Georgia.
Sat Sep 16, 2017, 06:21 PM
Sep 2017

Too busy to pay attention there until today.

Consider this from 2016:

"Premiums for a newer primary residence in a 100-year floodplain with $250,000 of building coverage can range, under plausible assumptions, from $380–$590 when the home is 2–4 feet above base flood elevation (BFE) or from $650–$1,890 at BFE."

That's under $180/month. That's from http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-PB-16-10.pdf, whatever www.rff.org is this appears to be an in-house document.

Very few people with expensive homes in a 100-year floodplain in Houston avoid flood insurance and in the 100-floodplain mortgages pretty much require it here and have for decades.

In Houston some estimates are that half of the structures flooded are outside of any recognized floodplain.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flood insurance and Healt...