Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,217 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 11:29 PM Jun 2016

Alaska governor limits annual oil-wealth checks to $1,000

Source: Associated Press

Alaska governor limits annual oil-wealth checks to $1,000

Mark Thiessen, Associated Press

Updated 9:15 pm, Wednesday, June 29, 2016

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Facing a multibillion-dollar deficit, Alaska's governor on Wednesday cut in half the annual checks that give all residents a share of the state's oil wealth, but he kept enough money in place to award everyone a $1,000 payout.

Gov. Bill Walker's administration said the checks had to be reduced in order to save the program.

The veto "preserves that ability to provide a check to every citizen in this state forever," his budget director, Pat Pitney, said.

If nothing was done, Walker said the Alaska Permanent Fund — worth about $52 billion — would have been depleted in four years.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Alaska-could-end-to-oil-checks-paid-to-residents-8331237.php

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
2. Not just an entitlement. This is flat out redistrution of the revenues of oil companies to
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 03:13 AM
Jun 2016

the general public.

What's hilarious is that in spite of all her tirades against socialism, Palin's only accomplishment as governor was doubling the amount of money paid out to the residents of Alaska under this program. That's the reason that her approval rating was sky high when she was picked to be McCain's running mate.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
4. Keith, it's really not - it was a great thought cooked up -
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 05:45 AM
Jun 2016

by a TERRIFIC and get this, Republican Governor, our own Bush Rat................Hammond.

Alaska gave up so much to the feds and the oil companies, and all the (really in a way invaders) people who came up just to take the revenue "home" with them, Jay Hammond said, hey, let's fix this so everyone gets a share.

It's worked for over 35 years. Some years, not a bunch, some years, a big bunch - depends on how much per barrel, etc. based on a several year spread.

The reason there's a problem now, is the oil companies OWN the Repukes, and every year, there are more concessions and tax rebates and shit, to BIG OIL. Yeah, we pay THEM to come up and suck it out and put nothing back. Nothing.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
6. Their sharholders.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 07:36 AM
Jun 2016

And no, the nasty from the Exxon Valdez is still on shore - and they have paid NOTHING.

If it happens where you are, I can give 3 tips. Knee-high rubber boots, a rubber apron, and a boat (canoe, really) to get you across the lake to Canada. But don't count on it

lostnfound

(16,138 posts)
7. reason enough to topple the governments when it happens in foreign places..
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 10:14 AM
Jun 2016

That's been the trigger for a lot of coups. Mossadeqh tried to nationalize oil. Resources must not benefit the masses. And if you think the inconvenience or damages to ordinary people should count in the equation, what's being done to save the homes of people in Oklahoma damaged by fracking? Nothing.

uppityperson

(115,674 posts)
10. No, it is a bride to AK residents to not use the money they are saving from the oil
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jun 2016

The state had a surplus of $ for years and put some in savings (simplified explanation). In order to keep the voters from voting to use that money, each resident gets a dividend from the interest annually. If they vote to spend the money for state needs, then they won't continue to get the dividends.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
8. WAIT A MINUTE - Do you mean all those Alaskan Reality shows
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jun 2016

that show the independent, living-off-the-grid, no government in my life, are getting a subsidy. What with soc. security , welfare, and occasional check from the oil people and this and that from that damn government - it seems like a good lifestyle.

This has got to be a real jolt to that Brown family. What a group of misfits - maybe we need a state like Alaska to hold them and Sarah Palin.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
9. I know, right? I love some of those shows, but
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jun 2016

many of the stories don't really add up. Some of these characters have got to be undercover federal law enforcement.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Alaska governor limits an...