Thu Jan 28, 2021, 12:52 PM
Polybius (13,433 posts)
Biden seen likely to keep Space Force, a Trump favoriteThis discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum). WASHINGTON (AP) — To the last moments of his presidency, Donald Trump trumpeted Space Force as a creation for the ages. And while President Joe Biden has quickly undone other Trump initiatives, the space-faring service seems likely to survive, even if the new administration pushes it lower on the list of defense priorities. The reason Space Force is unlikely to go away is largely this: Elimination would require an act of Congress, where a bipartisan consensus holds that America’s increasing reliance on space is a worrying vulnerability that is best addressed by a branch of the military focused exclusively on this problem. The new service also is linked to an increasing U.S. wariness of China, which is developing capabilities to threaten U.S. satellites in space and which has become, in the minds of some, the singular national security challenge. Russia, too, stands accused by Washington of seeking to challenge American dominance in space. “They’re building capabilities to use space against us. We have to be able to respond to that,” Gen. John Hyten, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the National Security Space Association, an advocacy group, last week, referring to Russia and China. Read more: https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-politics-national-security-edcb01683ab38e740ae87530c49ecd4e ![]()
|
20 replies, 1557 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Polybius | Jan 2021 | OP |
efhmc | Jan 2021 | #1 | |
RockRaven | Jan 2021 | #2 | |
Auggie | Jan 2021 | #4 | |
NCjack | Jan 2021 | #3 | |
Mawspam2 | Jan 2021 | #12 | |
C Moon | Jan 2021 | #14 | |
Laha | Jan 2021 | #5 | |
Zorro | Jan 2021 | #6 | |
ancianita | Jan 2021 | #8 | |
Zorro | Jan 2021 | #9 | |
ancianita | Jan 2021 | #10 | |
newdayneeded | Jan 2021 | #7 | |
bdtrppr6 | Jan 2021 | #11 | |
Mr. Sparkle | Jan 2021 | #13 | |
yaesu | Jan 2021 | #15 | |
herding cats | Jan 2021 | #16 | |
LiberalFighter | Jan 2021 | #17 | |
Happy Hoosier | Jan 2021 | #18 | |
Omaha Steve | Jan 2021 | #19 | |
Omaha Steve | Jan 2021 | #20 |
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 12:54 PM
efhmc (14,463 posts)
1. So it has the possbility to be a useable entity?
Who knew?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:05 PM
RockRaven (13,412 posts)
2. Can he at least change the name/iconography to something less embarrassing?
As it stands now, it is literally cartoonish.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RockRaven (Reply #2)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:09 PM
Auggie (30,552 posts)
4. And this isn't helping:
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:05 PM
NCjack (10,248 posts)
3. Rename it Obama Force.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to NCjack (Reply #3)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:27 PM
Mawspam2 (577 posts)
12. Winner!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to NCjack (Reply #3)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:48 PM
C Moon (11,923 posts)
14. Ouch!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:10 PM
Laha (407 posts)
5. I kind of expected this.
Makes sense, there are legitimate concerns there. I just wish Trump wasn't so damn lame to use a name like Space Force and rip off the Star Trek Federation's logo.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:14 PM
Zorro (15,680 posts)
6. Rename it Aerospace Force
That might be something worthwhile to consider.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Zorro (Reply #6)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:20 PM
ancianita (33,673 posts)
8. Yes. Less 'space,' more 'Force.' Good idea.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ancianita (Reply #8)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:22 PM
Zorro (15,680 posts)
9. Yes. Better branding.
Gets past the Trump stink attached to "Space Force".
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Zorro (Reply #9)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:23 PM
ancianita (33,673 posts)
10. Totally. When 81 milion hear 'space' they hear cult crap.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:15 PM
newdayneeded (1,832 posts)
7. Or just add "Com" to the end
short and military version of command.
Sounds more legit then. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:23 PM
bdtrppr6 (796 posts)
11. Space Farce
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 01:33 PM
Mr. Sparkle (2,834 posts)
13. The founding father of space force cannot be Trump, he should end it!
and reincarnate it under another name
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 02:09 PM
yaesu (8,018 posts)
15. Rename it Jefferson Starship, turn it into a fan club. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 02:29 PM
herding cats (19,244 posts)
16. Trump didn't found this program, he renamed it and made it a separate branch of the military.
It's actually been around as a part of the USAF since 1982.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 02:30 PM
LiberalFighter (47,728 posts)
17. Reduce funding.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 02:32 PM
Happy Hoosier (5,462 posts)
18. C'mon man..... NT
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 03:18 PM
Omaha Steve (95,758 posts)
19. After a review by forum hosts....LOCKING
Analysis/opinion.
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Polybius (Original post)
Omaha Steve This message was self-deleted by its author.