Tue Jan 24, 2023, 04:36 PM
Algernon Moncrieff (5,703 posts)
Tanks for Ukraine: Germany to send Leopard 2s and allow others to export - reports
Source: BBC News
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has decided to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine, and allow other countries to do the same, reports in Germany say. Leopard 2s are made in Germany and Berlin needs to approve their export. Germany has been hesitant to send its own - or allow other nations to send theirs - over concerns it could escalate the conflict with Russia. Now, after international pressure, Mr Scholz has decided to send at least 14 Leopard 2s, German outlets say. Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64391272?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA ![]()
|
26 replies, 1711 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Algernon Moncrieff | Jan 24 | OP |
sinkingfeeling | Jan 24 | #1 | |
GB_RN | Jan 24 | #2 | |
PortTack | Jan 24 | #3 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | Jan 24 | #7 | |
Aristus | Jan 24 | #4 | |
ColinC | Jan 24 | #5 | |
Kennah | Jan 24 | #19 | |
ColinC | Jan 25 | #21 | |
patphil | Jan 24 | #6 | |
SergeStorms | Jan 24 | #8 | |
LudwigPastorius | Jan 24 | #11 | |
SergeStorms | Jan 24 | #15 | |
johnnyfins | Jan 24 | #9 | |
orangecrush | Jan 24 | #12 | |
LudwigPastorius | Jan 24 | #13 | |
Igel | Jan 24 | #17 | |
IronLionZion | Jan 25 | #20 | |
orangecrush | Jan 24 | #10 | |
myohmy2 | Jan 24 | #14 | |
orangecrush | Jan 24 | #16 | |
littlemissmartypants | Jan 25 | #23 | |
orangecrush | Jan 25 | #25 | |
Warpy | Jan 24 | #18 | |
littlemissmartypants | Jan 25 | #22 | |
Layzeebeaver | Jan 25 | #24 | |
Ray Bruns | Jan 25 | #26 |
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 04:37 PM
sinkingfeeling (47,246 posts)
1. Good news.
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 04:47 PM
GB_RN (1,844 posts)
2. Hot Damn!
I'd be willing to bet that we've been training Ukrainian tankers on the M1-Abrams for months now, and that we might see a "decision" to send some of those - fitting with the timeline of the end of training for tank/maintenance crews. I read yesterday that the Biden Administration has been rethinking their stance on (not) sending the M1-Abrams...and this also would fit that timeline (about a year of total training). Read into this what you will.
Edit to add: From the WSJ: US Leans Towards Providing Abrams Tanks To Ukraine From Daily Kos, on that article: On Tuesday morning, The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the United States is “leaning” toward sending M1A2 main battle tanks Abrams tanks to Ukraine, with an announcement expected this week. Emphasis mine. The M1A2 is the most up-to-date version of the Abrams tank (previous iterations being the M1, and M1-A1). |
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 05:07 PM
PortTack (28,695 posts)
3. Thank the gods!! This investigation needs to stay focused on the one person that took them
Willfully and with intent. But…it also needs to shift to the national archives keeping of said documents. Seems they fell down on the job
|
Response to PortTack (Reply #3)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 06:36 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (44,189 posts)
7. Wrong thread. . . .nt
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 05:08 PM
Aristus (61,182 posts)
4. Those poor Russian tankers aren't going to know what hit them.
Of course, they always have the choice to scurry back across the border to the Motherland.
|
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 05:09 PM
ColinC (7,151 posts)
5. Cool now do f16s
Response to ColinC (Reply #5)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 11:44 PM
Kennah (9,941 posts)
19. Saab Gripens probably make more sense
Response to Kennah (Reply #19)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:05 AM
ColinC (7,151 posts)
21. Okay yeah, let's do that
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 05:17 PM
patphil (4,475 posts)
6. 'bout time.
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 06:42 PM
SergeStorms (18,132 posts)
8. I wish it weren't necessary....
but Ukraine needs a level playing field with Russia. I wish Putin would stop this madness. He stands zero chance of defeating Ukraine now, and all he's doing is ending the lives of his own people and Ukrainians. His big macho ego won't allow him to stop. It's madness 😠.
|
Response to SergeStorms (Reply #8)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 06:53 PM
LudwigPastorius (6,110 posts)
11. My fear is that the west is gaming this war with the assumption that...
Putin wants to ensure the survival of Russia and himself.
I hope the Pentagon and NATO are at least considering the possibility that he is terminally ill and feels that he has nothing to lose. |
Response to LudwigPastorius (Reply #11)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 08:39 PM
SergeStorms (18,132 posts)
15. I think he's being watched....
by a few generals or government officials. The moment he starts getting ideas about ending the world some of them will step in and stop him. Putin probably has children all over Russia. I don't think he'd be too cavalier with their lives.
At least I hope not. 🙄 |
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 06:51 PM
johnnyfins (510 posts)
9. Wait...
How is Germany allowed to make tanks? WTF? Am I living in an alternate reality right now? I know that they have been a democratic state for a long time, but REALLY????? Look at the pic. The Iron Cross????????????
|
Response to johnnyfins (Reply #9)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 06:56 PM
orangecrush (16,128 posts)
12. Dude!
Where have you been?
We gave them Lockheed Starfighters to fight the Russians back in the 60's! One truly badass (and dangerous!) aircraft, if I say so myself! ![]() |
Response to johnnyfins (Reply #9)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 07:08 PM
LudwigPastorius (6,110 posts)
13. Germany has had tanks since it joined NATO in 1955.
And, the Iron Cross was a Prussian/German military symbol 120 years before the Nazis came along. |
Response to johnnyfins (Reply #9)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 09:24 PM
Igel (33,324 posts)
17. Yeah, the iron cross.
It existed before the Nazis warped it (could say the same thing about WWI) and after.
In the early '70s my 6th grade field trip was to DC. Smithsonian and nearby points. Wanted a souvenir, bought a big blue cross. Hadn't seen an iron cross. Little demons didn't jump up to say, "Ha! You're a Nazi." My father looked askance at it for two reasons: He fought in WWII (okay, he was on the way to fight when Japan surrendered and so his minesweeper checked Tokyo Harbor and he was on deck for the signing of the treaty ... the Fitch). But mostly he looked askance at the blue thing because it was at the time for young people associated more with being a hippie. Somehow the last bit has no real Internet memory that I can find in 90 seconds' Googling. Then again it was an eddy in a backwater of the river of discourse. But there's this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Cross And https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr_Cross_of_Honour_for_Valour . |
Response to johnnyfins (Reply #9)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 12:17 AM
IronLionZion (41,562 posts)
20. A lot of things existed before the Nazis ruined it
and will continue to exist long after
![]() https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika West Germany was allowed to militarize in 1955 to defend against the Soviets in East Germany https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr#Cold_War:_1955%E2%80%931990 Next you'll be shocked to find out about Japan's military |
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 06:52 PM
orangecrush (16,128 posts)
10. What a nice present for Putin!
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 07:10 PM
myohmy2 (3,023 posts)
14. excellent...
...however...
...how are the Ukrainians ever going to operate, maintain, supply and repair this hodge-podge of Western/NATO military equipment...? ...they must be ambidextrous... ![]() |
Response to myohmy2 (Reply #14)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 09:08 PM
orangecrush (16,128 posts)
16. The German tanks
Are very user friendly, from what I hear. That's why they prefer them, much shorter training ![]() |
Response to orangecrush (Reply #16)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:46 AM
littlemissmartypants (19,906 posts)
23. The leopards are smaller, faster and more fuel efficient. IIRC, that's why Ukraine wants them. ❤️
Response to littlemissmartypants (Reply #23)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 08:26 AM
orangecrush (16,128 posts)
25. Thanks!
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 09:45 PM
Warpy (105,841 posts)
18. The fight was lost once Duda pretty much told Germany to go jump in a lake
because Poland was sending them, period. Now Germany will have to do things: save face and preserve their market share in heavy tanks. The UK might be snapping at their heels.
|
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:40 AM
littlemissmartypants (19,906 posts)
22. I'll believe it when I see it....
Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 04:18 AM
Layzeebeaver (1,204 posts)
24. 14... Fourteen....
Seriously, the west needs to get off its arse and go all-in on the equipment.
How about a full battalion on Leopard 2? rather than a couple of platoons. Frankly, Ukraine need tanks, and anti-tank weapons as well. Russia is on a knife edge at the moment - if we provide the necessary tools, the Ukrainian military can do wonders. Just do it already! |
Response to Layzeebeaver (Reply #24)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 09:00 AM
Ray Bruns (2,574 posts)
26. First off, you're taking about an expensive piece of equipment.
Second: Germany has to keep it’s own stockpile full. If takes a lot of time and money to build a western tank.
Western tanks are much more armored and sophisticated than the T72 and T80. It takes time to train not only the crews but an entire unit to work with each other. That’s why this decision should have been made last year. Delaying it only continues to drag out the war. |