HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » 'It's justified': Joe Bid...

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 11:06 AM

'It's justified': Joe Biden welcomes ICC arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin

Source: The Guardian

Joe Biden has welcomed the international criminal court’s decision to issue an arrest warrant for the Russian president for war crimes in Ukraine. The US president said Vladimir Putin had clearly committed war crimes and that the arrest warrant for the Russian leader made a “very strong point”.

“Well, I think it’s justified,” Biden said of the warrant on Friday. “But the question is – [the ICC is] not recognised internationally by us either. But I think it makes a very strong point.”

The US is not a member of the court and the Pentagon has resisted cooperating with it because of fears American soldiers could be pursued by the court.

The ICC decision, for allegations Putin has overseen the abduction of Ukrainian children, marks the first time the court has issued a warrant against one of the five permanent members of the UN security council.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/18/joe-biden-welcomes-icc-arrest-warrant-vladimir-putin

11 replies, 1384 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 11 replies Author Time Post
Reply 'It's justified': Joe Biden welcomes ICC arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin (Original post)
milestogo Mar 18 OP
cstanleytech Mar 18 #1
Warpy Mar 18 #5
cstanleytech Mar 18 #6
Warpy Mar 18 #7
Alexander Of Assyria Mar 18 #2
OMGWTF Mar 18 #3
EX500rider Mar 18 #4
Alexander Of Assyria Mar 18 #8
former9thward Mar 19 #10
Cha Mar 19 #9
Seeking Serenity Wednesday #11

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 11:52 AM

1. Well that is going to limit Putin's ability to travel which is not a bad thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cstanleytech (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 02:31 PM

5. Um, not really

No one would get through his phalanx of goons to arrest him. However, his destinations are already limited to places the ICC has no jurisdiction, so nothing has changed in that department.

There are two arrest warrants: Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, his head of the children's commission, who is hoarding 23 Ukrainian children herself while pushing through illegal adoptions of other Ukrainian children illegally seized and deported to Russia.

They claim it;s humanitarian, so did the Argentine dictators who disappeared the children of people they didn't like. The ICC considers it cultural genocide and a war crime. There is nothing humanitarian about snatching children from their home country and trying to turn them into little Russians, especially when their parents are still alive and desperately trying to get them back.

The last head of state the ICC indicted was Qadaffi and we know what happened to him. He didn't get arrested, either, but identifying him as a criminal went a long way toward convincing others in Libya that he was vulnerable.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warpy (Reply #5)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 04:23 PM

6. Countries will though have a justification to deny him entry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cstanleytech (Reply #6)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 05:18 PM

7. He already can't go to most of them

Besides, the price for increasing power is both isolation and paranoia.

What this has done is kill his government's ability to negotiate any sort of a deal to end the war on any terms but Ukraine's.

That means the return of all their children.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to milestogo (Original post)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:37 PM

2. So join the court America?, long overdue and in the national interest. As is now obvious.

Putin saying ICJ is western puppet ignores the fact many West nations aren’t members either.

With membership will come the privileges of engaging in the prosecution of all war criminals like Putin, instead of cheering from the peanut gallery.

More Colonial Hypocrisy, now nuclear armed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Alexander Of Assyria (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 02:08 PM

3. I don't think soldiers is the reason we're not a member of the ICC,

I think it's the war mongering Rethuglican politicians who want immunity from prosecution. Cheney The Dick and his dummy GeeDumbya should have faced trial in The Hague for their two fake wars for fun and profit which cost $3T and murdered over 500K people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OMGWTF (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 02:21 PM

4. Afghanistan wasn't a "fake war"

You can argue it was a bad idea but Al Queda absolutely was based there and had the permission and protection of the Taliban during 9/11. The US had to take some action over the death of 3,000 American citizens, more then Pearl Harbor & about 2 million Japanese died for that.
They had their chance to turn over Osama bin Laden and made their choice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OMGWTF (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 18, 2023, 06:30 PM

8. The tail is clearly wagging the dog on this one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OMGWTF (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 19, 2023, 03:18 PM

10. Really?

Why haven't Democratic presidents joined?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to milestogo (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2023, 02:31 PM

9. It most certainly is, Justified. TY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to milestogo (Original post)

Wed Mar 22, 2023, 06:31 AM

11. Here's the funny part

Putin could come to the US with full immunity granted to foreign leaders and without fear of arrest because the US is not a part of the ICC. Bill Clinton signed the treaty, but didn't (wouldn't) send it the Senate for ratification. Every subsequent president, in turn, also refused to submit the treaty for ratification.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread