Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(149,317 posts)
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:24 PM Feb 13

Scores of firings have begun at federal agencies

Source: CNN Politics

Updated 1:50 PM EST, Thu February 13, 2025


CNN — Scores of firings have begun at federal agencies, with terminations of probationary employees underway at the Department of Education and the Small Business Administration, federal employees and union sources told CNN Wednesday. The firings mark the first from the Trump administration as President Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency aim to dramatically shrink the federal workforce. Until now, federal employees across all government agencies had only been placed on paid administrative leave.

The move comes the same day as a federal judge allowed the administration’s deferred resignation program to proceed. About 77,000 employees have accepted the offer, which generally allows them to leave their jobs but be paid through the end of September.

A form letter sent to Department of Education employees, obtained by CNN, informing them of their termination stated: “The Agency finds, based on your performance, that you have not demonstrated that your further employment at the Agency would be in the public interest.” At the Department of Education, the firings have impacted employees across the agency from the general counsel’s office, to the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services that supports programs for children with disabilities, to the Federal Student Aid office, a union source told CNN.

The source said they have heard from dozens of employees who have been fired, but the full scope of the firings was not immediately clear. The American Federation of Government Employees represents about 160 Department of Education employees that fall under the probationary status.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/12/politics/scores-of-firings-federal-agencies

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scores of firings have begun at federal agencies (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 13 OP
He is overstepping his boundaries and going absolutely mad with power. Initech Feb 13 #1
May drumpf and Musk burn in hell. greatauntoftriplets Feb 13 #2
Plus Fox News, every AM radio station, every propaganda outlet, every megachurch. Initech Feb 13 #4
After all whats going on in our countryn, i feel there is NO Heaven and NO Hell. bluestarone Feb 13 #6
Oh yes there is a hell........ Butterflylady Feb 13 #14
You can't be fired without cause Deminpenn Feb 13 #3
not correct pimpbot Feb 13 #7
Not correct BumRushDaShow Feb 13 #9
Iirc from Deminpenn Feb 13 #15
If the employee isn't performing, then yes, that is the point of the probationary period BumRushDaShow Feb 14 #18
There was one guy in our Deminpenn Feb 14 #20
LOL BumRushDaShow Feb 14 #21
Really Snoopy 7 Feb 14 #19
The article stated they were probationary slightlv Feb 13 #11
If I understand correctly . . . Allie2111016 Feb 14 #23
If the employee can prove the action was done as retaliation BumRushDaShow Feb 14 #24
Will these people be able to collect unemployment? Wicked Blue Feb 13 #5
How can ANY court not see what these terrorist traitors are doing? bluestarone Feb 13 #8
If the courts won't do something, then the people will have to. hadEnuf Feb 13 #10
This is how Luigis are born PSPS Feb 13 #13
If anything presents itself as political on the face of it, slightlv Feb 13 #12
A court (not sure which) threw out a case saying the union didn't have standing underpants Feb 15 #26
Poaching employees AncientOfDays Feb 14 #16
Probationay employees usually don't know much Deminpenn Feb 14 #17
Probationary time issue AncientOfDays Feb 15 #25
Probationary periods vary Deminpenn Feb 15 #28
My husband works for the feds . . . Allie2111016 Feb 14 #22
They are dumping all the probationary period staff across Departments underpants Feb 15 #27
FEDWEEK is an excellent source of accurate and detailed info Deminpenn Feb 16 #29

Initech

(104,265 posts)
1. He is overstepping his boundaries and going absolutely mad with power.
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:27 PM
Feb 13

Fuck Trump and the people who voted for him.

Initech

(104,265 posts)
4. Plus Fox News, every AM radio station, every propaganda outlet, every megachurch.
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:43 PM
Feb 13

And all of the brainwashed masses who voted for him. Hope Satan's got a special place reserved for all of these people.

bluestarone

(19,232 posts)
6. After all whats going on in our countryn, i feel there is NO Heaven and NO Hell.
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:46 PM
Feb 13

If we want our democracy WE are the only ones that can get it.

Deminpenn

(16,639 posts)
3. You can't be fired without cause
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:35 PM
Feb 13

If these employees have unsatisfactory performance reviews, that would be different.

pimpbot

(1,063 posts)
7. not correct
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:51 PM
Feb 13

They are focusing on employees within the first year probationary period. It is possible to terminate their employment within the first year.

Next up will be everyone else, but for tenured employees they will actually have to come up with some evidence. More likely they will attempt to relocate entire organizations to a locstion people dont want to move to, and force them out.

BumRushDaShow

(149,317 posts)
9. Not correct
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 04:00 PM
Feb 13

If the employee can show the firing was for retaliation and/or discrimination, then they have a case to appeal. In some of these cases with the "DEI" nonsense, they could sue for discrimination as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 hasn't suddenly been repealed.

(I was a federal supervisor during my career before retiring)

Deminpenn

(16,639 posts)
15. Iirc from
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 10:35 PM
Feb 13

when I was hired for a career ladder position, you could be fired if you didn't perform satisfactorily while you were on the ladder to your final grade and series.

I'd think this action could only apply to new hires, not to employees with career status who were promoted into ladder positions.

BumRushDaShow

(149,317 posts)
18. If the employee isn't performing, then yes, that is the point of the probationary period
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 05:23 AM
Feb 14

And even then, supervisors have and will put the employee on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and SHOULD BE "counseling" them through their training period.

But if an employee is meeting or exceeding the performance requirements, then hauling off and randomly firing, notably where an employee can show it was done for retaliatory or discriminatory purposes, is verboten, and the employee can file a case with the EEOC or MSPB (Merit System Protection Board), whichever agency's function applies.

The documentation that a supervisor needs to provide to remove a career employee is a whole other thing.

I know early in my career, one of my old supervisors had to go through a nightmarish marathon of documenting for not one, but eventually two "stalker" type employees who needed to be out of there (one who had been moved around from district office to district office as those offices had had enough but didn't want to go through the hassle of a separation). And even after they were removed, they were still harassing employees and the supervisor (calling the office, showing up at the worksite, etc.).

This administration is about to put this country in a recession, quick, fast, and in a hurry.

Deminpenn

(16,639 posts)
20. There was one guy in our
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 09:34 AM
Feb 14

office who was literally untrainable. As in your example, he was moved around from branch to branch with everyone else having to cover the work he should have been doing. One supervisor spent over a year documenting and trying to get the guy fired. Unfortunately this guy had a friend who was a big boss who protected him.

We had one guy who was hired, spent a day or two on the job, decided he hated it and went back to driving a pizza truck or something.

Maybe there should be a thread for these stories.

BumRushDaShow

(149,317 posts)
21. LOL
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 09:52 AM
Feb 14

I do recall a couple who lasted maybe a couple weeks or so and were gone. In one case it was someone who didn't want to divest of their extensive stock holdings for firms that were part of the agency's "regulated industry".

And yes, there will always be "the problem children" (I had a couple that I had to hand-hold).

Snoopy 7

(630 posts)
19. Really
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 08:38 AM
Feb 14

That's your reasoning? Jesus, why aren't you asking what are they doing with the MONEY? The money they are taking away from hard working people will be used to supply TAX BREAKS for the billionaires. The trump administration already has the plan. They just want the poor to pay for the billionaires break (https://www.americanprogress.org/article/4-ways-house-republicans-emerging-tax-package-would-put-billionaires-over-families/). Don't be half hearted, if your reasoning is just logical and not political, so please think and study about what you want to post. Don't forget: https://democrats.org/news/trumps-treasury-secretary-will-give-billionaires-another-round-of-tax-handouts/.

slightlv

(5,195 posts)
11. The article stated they were probationary
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 05:24 PM
Feb 13

that means, at least as far as I remember it, that you can be fired without specific cause. If you pass the probationary period, that's a bird of a different color. Prior to probation? It's akin more to "at will"....

Allie2111016

(7 posts)
23. If I understand correctly . . .
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 12:43 PM
Feb 14

If you are in a probationary period, you can be fired at will. (Source is my husband, who's a fed employee.)

BumRushDaShow

(149,317 posts)
24. If the employee can prove the action was done as retaliation
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 12:57 PM
Feb 14

and/or for discriminatory reasons (and not just race/gender but also disability), then they have a recourse through either the EEOC or the Merit System Protection Board.

(I was a federal supervisor during part of my career before retiring)

Wicked Blue

(7,724 posts)
5. Will these people be able to collect unemployment?
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:43 PM
Feb 13

If not, what the hell are they going to do about food, rent/mortgage, utilities and other necessities?

bluestarone

(19,232 posts)
8. How can ANY court not see what these terrorist traitors are doing?
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 03:55 PM
Feb 13

Turning their eyes away from our Democracy.

slightlv

(5,195 posts)
12. If anything presents itself as political on the face of it,
Thu Feb 13, 2025, 05:25 PM
Feb 13

these firings are the cherry on top. How can you NOT see it's political... after all, he's stated that if you don't bow down and kiss the ring he'll get rid of you.

underpants

(189,414 posts)
26. A court (not sure which) threw out a case saying the union didn't have standing
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 11:57 AM
Feb 15

I’m not a lawyer but I don’t how that’s possible. I think it was the SEIU which, as I understand things, is there to represent their members.

AncientOfDays

(224 posts)
16. Poaching employees
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 12:42 AM
Feb 14

Their claim is they're cutting waste, but actually they're poaching employees. These government workers they are firing come pre-vetted, with knowledge and experience, The oligarchs will sell the services of these employees back to the government at a profit.

For decades we've been fed the lies that government is incompetent and wasteful , when the truth is that private enterprise simply can't compete - especially on quality.

Deminpenn

(16,639 posts)
17. Probationay employees usually don't know much
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 01:01 AM
Feb 14

This the time they're being trained in the job duties and how to do them. It takes a while to really learn the ins and outs no matter how easy a job might look to someone on the outside.

AncientOfDays

(224 posts)
25. Probationary time issue
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 11:50 AM
Feb 15

I understand that probation is lengthy - like 2 years. You can learn a lot in even 1 year.

Deminpenn

(16,639 posts)
28. Probationary periods vary
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 12:39 PM
Feb 15

For example if you are hired into a GS-5/7/9 career ladder position, it's 2 years. If you are hired into a GS-9/11 seriers, it's 1 year. I think if you''re just hired in a non-ladder position, then it's a year.

What you learn really depends on who is training you. I was very lucky to have had excellent colleagues who knew what they were doing and did it well, showing me the ropes. But even with that, I wasn't prepared when I was put into a position managing a program while still a trainee.

Allie2111016

(7 posts)
22. My husband works for the feds . . .
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 12:35 PM
Feb 14

My husband, thank goodness, is close to retirement; not a probationary employee. I am concerned that the powers that be might find a reason to get rid of him and/or find an excuse to not give him his retirement benefits.

He did ask what would happen to his retirement if he took the federal "buyout" and was told, you lose it. One of the benefits we'd lose would be our health insurance, and we both need it.

underpants

(189,414 posts)
27. They are dumping all the probationary period staff across Departments
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 11:59 AM
Feb 15

and there is a hiring freeze. Recruitment and retention are necessary parts of any sized operation. At least normally.

Deminpenn

(16,639 posts)
29. FEDWEEK is an excellent source of accurate and detailed info
Sun Feb 16, 2025, 11:29 AM
Feb 16

about the layoffs, probationary periods and prospective RIFs.

This is their article about the layoffs:

https://www.fedweek.com/fedweek/widespread-layoffs-of-probationary-employees-begin/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scores of firings have be...