Edward Snowden nominated for Nobel peace prize
Source: The Guardian
Two Norwegian politicians say they have jointly nominated former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden for the 2014 Nobel peace prize. Socialist politicians Baard Vegar Solhjell, a former environment minister, and Snorre Valen said the public debate and policy changes "in the wake of Snowden's whistleblowing has contributed to a more stable and peaceful world order".
Being nominated means Snowden will be one of scores of names that the Nobel committee will consider for the prestigious award. The five-member panel will not confirm who has been nominated but those who submit nominations sometimes make them public.
Nominators, including members of national parliaments and governments, university professors and previous laureates, must enter their submissions by 1 February. The prize committee members can add their own candidates at their first meeting after that deadline.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/29/edward-snowden-nominated-nobel-peace-prize
Take that, General Alexander!
I hope it really irritates our Spy Masters at the NSA.
bananas
(27,509 posts):applaud:
unreadierLizard
(475 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)the nomination process is not exactly exclusive:
Qualified Nominators
According to the statutes of the Nobel Foundation, a nomination is considered valid if it is submitted by a person who falls within one of the following categories:
Members of national assemblies and governments of states
Members of international courts
University rectors; professors of social sciences, history, philosophy, law and theology; directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy institutes
Persons who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
Board members of organizations that have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
Active and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee; (proposals by members of the Committee to be submitted no later than at the first meeting of the Committee after February 1)
Former advisers to the Norwegian Nobel Committee )
http://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/index.html
By this criteria, Ted Cruz could nominate the cast of Duck Dynasty.
Also, don't know that I would want to belong to a fraternity that includes Henry Kissenger.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)That's why I put absolutely no value whatsoever in people being nominated.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Hard to take such things seriously.
RC
(25,592 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)Wouldn't you agree?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)I don't think it was deserved. The guy gets elected in November, and gets the prize about 2-3 months later if memory serves.
Also, in light of his failure to pull out of Iraq/Afghanistan in a timely manner (in the case of Afghanistan, not at all), it is doubly undeserved.
Some will claim that Congress was the barrier, but the only barrier was political. To have withdrawn from both countries immediately would have underscored the illegality of the war, and since the administration had no intention of conducting war crimes trials, it tacitly endorsed the war.
Fearless
(18,448 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)But there would be no chance in hell that Duck Dynasty would get a single vote. Edward Snowden, however, has a very good chance of winning the prize, and by unanimous consent.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)But I am guessing it wouldn't be hard to find a bookie willing to give 100:1 against.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)But that is just a given with this kind of bet.
MattSh
(3,714 posts)Sounds like frothing! Take cover everyone!
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Getting nominated isn't terribly difficult. You just have to be a legislator, a university professor, former recipients, or members of this group or that to submit a nomination.
7962
(11,841 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts). . . above on this same string.
MADem
(135,425 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)That was the Oxycontin talking.
MADem
(135,425 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I think it was 2007 when he made the claims so that means in 2057 (50 years after the award was given out) that we will actually know the truth.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)First off, the Nobel Prize people never ever post who has been nominated. This isn't the Oscars where we have a whole 2-3 months where we can set up office pools to pick who will win from the list of nominees. Once a year the NP folks will announce who won and we can only speculate who that person or group was up again. In fact the actual list of the nominees are actually sealed for 50 years. So we technically will never know who was up for nomination until 2064.
Nomination forms are sent by the Nobel Committee to about 3,000 individuals, usually in September the year before the prizes are awarded. These individuals are often academics working in a relevant area. For the Peace Prize, inquiries are sent to governments, members of international courts, professors and rectors, former Peace Prize laureates and current or former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. The deadline for the return of the nomination forms is 31 January of the year of the award.[44][45] The Nobel Committee nominates about 300 potential laureates from these forms and additional names.[46] The nominees are not publicly named, nor are they told that they are being considered for the prize. All nomination records for a prize are sealed for 50 years from the awarding of the prize
Having said that, to actually get your name on the list isn't that difficult, you just need to know the right people. And in the past there have been some very odd claims as to people who have been nominated. I mean even Rush Limbaugh claims to have been nominated for the prize. I remember some doctor who claimed Terri Schaivo was not truly brain dead use to claim he was nominated for the Medicine award. People make these claims all the time and in the end it's difficult to dispute since it'll take 50 years to actually prove it.
So as for 'irritating our Spy Masters' I highly doubt it. Knowing how the process works and knowing some of the clowns that have said have been nominated this is just par for the course.
Herman D
(15 posts)1) The Nobel Peace Price
2) A Full Presidential Pardon
Demeter
(85,373 posts)not the plastic Tea Party patriotism, not the violent NRA style, stand-your-ground patriotism, and DEFINITELY not the 1% Elitist version!
He is a Pete Seeger style Patriot. Which wouldn't be a bad name for the medal!
catbyte
(35,656 posts)and only became a "whistle-blower" when Obama was elected & he donated to Ron Paul in 2012. Yeah, a real fucking hero.
MADem
(135,425 posts)You'll upset the people who think that Anonymous isn't riddled with FBI informants!
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and you OUGHT to do a link instead of making unsupported slander. We have standards here.
catbyte
(35,656 posts)Or this:
http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2013/07/08/meet-edward-snowden-gun-nut-obama-hater-foe-of-social-security-fan-of-government-spying/#axzz2rp9wP9yE
Yeah, a real fucking hero.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)catbyte
(35,656 posts)member for 12 fucking years. I know what's what. We just don't agree.
reusrename
(1,716 posts)The guy didn't just fall off the turnip truck. He needed access to do what he's done.
You should really try and focus on what he's telling everyone now, in public, and on the record.
You should also try and focus on how he was able to gain such access. I've worked for the MIC so perhaps I have a more knowledgeable view about this stuff than some other folks do.
catbyte
(35,656 posts)Look, he unearthed some valuable stuff, but the hero worship of him around here is creepy. Anybody saying anything the least little bit critical of his motives or character gets attacked. I just don't get it.
reusrename
(1,716 posts)This is probably a more dangerous dynamic than the nuclear issue we faced when I was growing up. Nuclear detente (including the whole MAD concept) was something the world had never faced before and it was a difficult subject with much at stake.
Having lived through it, I honestly believe the stakes are even higher now with this new technology.
"It's the economy metadata stoopid!" - James Carville
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023347631
I doubt that it's possible to roll back this technology. We need to figure out a way forward.
catbyte
(35,656 posts)His disdain of President Obama and his policies was apparent and he bitched about them with increasing frequency. But there are two issues where, I believe, where Snowdens true colors shine very clearly. This is one:
SNOWDEN: save money? cut this social security bullshit
User11: hahahayes
User18: Yeah! Fuck old people!
User11: social security is bullshit
User11: lets just toss old people out in the street
User18: Old people could move in with [User11].
User11: NOOO
User11: they smell funny
SNOWDEN: Somehow, our society managed to make it hundreds of years without social security just fine
SNOWDEN: you fucking retards
SNOWDEN: Magically the world changed after the new deal, and old people became made of glass
SNOWDEN: yeah, that makes sense
User11: wow
User11: you are just so fucking stupid
SNOWDEN: yeah, [User11]. and youre quite a gem
User19: and magically, life expectancy has doubled in the last 100 years.funny how that works.
SNOWDEN: [User19], you dont think modern medicine has something to do with that? no? its social security? wow. I guess I missed that.
User11: hurr wait a second, life expectancy has shot up in recent times along with the dissolution of the communal family unit in exchange for the nuclear family
User11: gee i guess we might need to create a safety net for the sudden glut of helpless elderly????
SNOWDEN: they wouldnt be fucking helpless if you werent sending them fucking checks to sit on their ass and lay in hospitals all day
User11: you are so goddamned stupd*pid
User11: PUT OLD PEOPLE TO WORK IN THE FIELDS
SNOWDEN: my grandmother is eighty fucking three this year, and you know what? she still supports herself working as a goddamned hairdresser
Fuck old people? An objectivist view if ever there was one. The other issue is the Second Amendment:
User: the restrictions were made to appease the conservatives to get another bill passed. fucking cons.
SNOWDEN: See, thats why Im goddamned glad for the second amendment. Me and all my lunatic, gun-toting NRA compatriots would be on the steps of Congress before the C-Span feed finished.
----------
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/06/have-we-all-been-fooled-by-edward-snowden/
This is the website where he posted all that despicable shit:
http://arstechnica.com/about-us/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)toby jo
(1,269 posts)to Oprah on news this morning. Maybe he can switch up his priorities.
aquart
(69,014 posts)And that's me being lenient.
Response to Herman D (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
rtracey
(2,062 posts)and when he goes to Sweden to get his "award".....grab him and bring him back. Maybe he can wear his award proudly in Levenworth
Snowden should be free and Bushco should be in Levenworth
Who's the traitor?
Who violated the Constitution?
What has Snowden gained for himself, how has he profited (profit being the key word, low poster) from revealing the TRUTH about the NSA vs look how much the BFEE and its aiders/abetters have been enriched by their theft of power, their lies and their wars (their death, destruction and debt)!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)And it is not too late.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Oh goody for Comrade Eddie, former American.
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)aware that Russia is no longer Communist?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)zonkers
(5,865 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Please read the above comments about the nomination process. If you have the right connections you could be nominated for the prize and in the end there is no real proof of the nomination since the Nobel Prize folks seal the nominees list for 50 years. In the end anyone could technically claim they were nominated without worrying about whether or not they are telling the truth.
Not that I'm saying that Snowden is lying, but just how the process works. This isn't the Oscars - we will never truly know all the people who were nominated and how they got nominated and even if their nomination got thru the process.
It just sounds like 2 politicians in Norway decided to put him on the list. When you think of it 2 tea party aligned politicans here in the states could do the same thing for Tony Perkins or Fred Phelps if they really wanted too.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Edward Snowden, on the other hand, has a very good chance of winning.
Do you really think a Nobel Peace Prize would have no effect on his situation?
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)This isn't the Oscars or Grammys. The Nobel Prize Committee does not give us the list of nominees so we can all start our office pools as to who will win. That list is sealed for 50 years. So in the end when you hear people make claims of nomination in reality you're making an assumption that whomever submitted the name got thru all the nomination process to be considered. Because of this process it's very common for people to brag about nominations because really - who can prove someone wrong if no one will see the list for 50 years.
As for your second statement - if he won then yes it would. Even I would have no doubt about that. But as a 'nominee' it is foolish to think there's any positive/game changer meaning to it.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)All I can say is that you may be underestimating how much the rest of the World hates what our NSA is doing to their privacy.
We shall see.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 29, 2014, 01:17 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm just a realist about the nomination process and understand the reasoning as to why the process is setup as it is.
It's that old adage of counting chickens before they are hatched.
The folks that created the Nobel Prize setup the nomination process for that exact reason - they wanted to honor a person in a specific field but they didn't want people going around using the concept of 'I'm a Nobel Prize Nominee' as part of their resume. When someone puts any kind of claim of importance that 'Well I was nominated for a Nobel Prize' then you know they are full of crap or very very very old (old enough to get nominated and then wait the 50 years to confirm they were telling the truth when the list is unsealed).
But don't get me wrong - if he wins and he could if his name is really truly on the list being considered, then it is a big deal. But until the awards are announced the article is nothing more than trivial gossip.
And a late edit note comment:
From the original article
Two Norwegian politicians say they have jointly nominated
In the end all we know is that 2 people say they have nominated Snowden. Maybe they have and maybe not but in the end we won't know if this is the truth unless 2 things happen - Snowden actually wins the Nobel (which means that yes indeed he was nominated) or it's 2064.
zonkers
(5,865 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Just trying to make people understand how the Nobel Prize system works.
I'm reading all these posts and other articles outside DU being writen about Snowden's 'nomination' and it's annoying that people assume that there was an actual nomination. Sure 2 guys in Norway say they did and maybe they did submit an application. But we have no way of ever knowing if Snowden was actually being considered unless he wins or it's 2064 (50 years after the award when the nomination list is unsealed). These articles are more like a jab at Obama than any real proof the guy is actually on the list.
The Nobel Prize award system is like an Olympics where you are only told who won the gold medal and never given any other details like who actually completed for the medal or even who might have won silver or bronze medals.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)That's how you win a peace prize.
aquart
(69,014 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)The death toll quickly increased from there. Before winning the Nobel Peace Prize Obama was already doing 'double taps' (killing the innocent people coming to help the wounded from the first drone strike), which is a war crime. He had also already targeted a funeral, killing more than 80 people. Several months later he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
aquart
(69,014 posts)How many people were being killed in that area before the drones?
I appreciate your righteous rage, but it lacks context.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)You think if an American soldier dies the president should kill innocent children, or dozens of innocent people attending a funeral?
aquart
(69,014 posts)Are you telling me we sent drones into a NUCLEAR nation without permission? Seriously?
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)If you are ignorant of the drone strikes in Pakistan than you need to do some research, and it is far greater than anything I can post. Here is a good visualization for you.
http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/
then try this
http://bit.ly/1gqYBNZ
aquart
(69,014 posts)Whichever.
I do appreciate the deflection. I don't trust you enough to click on the links but if it's mangled bodies, that ain't anything new to my eyes.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)It is irrelevant to me and anyone with a conscience. I saw your straw man setup a mile away. You obviously just want to deflect from the fact that Obama kills innocent people with drones, and did so before he won his Nobel Prize.
aquart
(69,014 posts)If yes, why can't you say so. Your squirming is making me curious. Obama killed people, for some reason, in a nuclear ally nation. I asked if he had permission. You went...odd and twisty. It was a straightforward question. I don't pay particular attention to Pakistan.
We all have our favorite innocents we don't think should be dead. These days mine are the Palestinians and others in Syria who are under siege and being starved to death, a slow, ugly way to go.
I'm also opposed to the Rohingya being tortured, maimed, sold into slavery, mass murdered. I keep mentioning it because few others seem to think it's worth mentioning.
But you prefer dead Pakistanis. Fine. They have a government which appears not to mind them dead so it's very nice of you to pick up the slack.
Still, I do wonder why you wouldn't answer my questions.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)"So he proved me wrong that Obama didn't kill innocent people and children with drones before he won the Nobel Peace Prize. If I can just change the topic from Obama killing innocent people, to permission to kill innocent people, I can somehow win the argument!"
Sorry, I don't care to argue with you pointless strawman. It is irrelevant to me whether or not Obama has permission from a government to kill it's innocent citizens, including children. If it matters to you, you do the research. And not only am I not interested in the subject, you won't open my links if I gave them to you.
Obama kills innocent people with drones, and did so before winning the Nobel Prize. I hope your 'permission' argument helps with your cognitive dissonance.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)You don't say? I have never heard of such a thing in any other country ever.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)There was a time when if an OP like yours appeared, there would have been less gang banging of the ideas, and actual discussion.
Of course, for whatever reason, although many things like war crimes were frowned on when George the Younger s the Prez, apparently those things are A-okay if done by someone with the "D" after his name.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Only the bad guys kill innocent people.
aquart
(69,014 posts)EX500rider
(11,410 posts)......so there's that........hmmm, wait..
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Know how to handle it properly. The real intent will rise, the puppet masters exposed for what the conspiracy theory entails.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I would say that Snowden did crave off a pretty big piece of General Alexander's lying, NSA butt.
A great many people will think that should count.
aquart
(69,014 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Who knows, the current president has one, if Snowden gets one, that increases his chances of getting pardoned, and then running for president!
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)Thank you Edward for your selfless devotion to our founding principles.
pa28
(6,145 posts)That in itself is a good thing.