Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Have the Stolen Documents undergone fingerprint and DNA analysis?
[link:https://www.newscientist.com/article/2331401-forensic-fingerprinting-technique-could-help-spot-document-fraud/|
[link:https://investigativegenetics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2041-2223-4-22|
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1531 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have the Stolen Documents undergone fingerprint and DNA analysis? (Original Post)
Marcuse
Sep 2022
OP
you would thiink there would be a way to weave a wire into each document that can allow for tracking
samnsara
Sep 2022
#1
Yes, the FBI (and the Secret Service) seem to have lowered standards and let their
Martin68
Sep 2022
#9
samnsara
(17,572 posts)1. you would thiink there would be a way to weave a wire into each document that can allow for tracking
....i mean how hard can that be?
Irish_Dem
(45,661 posts)7. I was thinking the same thing.
Some of the most valuable and dangerous documents in the world.
And no tracking devices on them?
Phones and dogs have tracking devices.
Seems like a small wire or tiny chip could be integrated into a piece of paper.
2naSalit
(86,074 posts)2. Probably in progress...
At this very moment.
LetMyPeopleVote
(144,005 posts)3. Probably
The FBI does not share data with the general public
Martin68
(22,671 posts)4. Well...duh. That's what the FBI does. Among other things.
Marcuse
(7,399 posts)5. One would hope so.
The letter from the Department of Justice, released by Senator Sheldon Whitehouses office today, confirms what we knew: The FBIs investigation into Dr. Christine Blasey Fords serious allegations about Justice Brett M. Kavanaughs sexual misconduct was a sham and a major institutional failure, Blasey Fords lawyers, Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, said in the Thursday statement. Not only did the FBI refuse to interview Dr. Ford or the corroborators listed in our letter to FBI Director Wray, it failed to act on the over 4,500 tips it received about then-nominee Kavanaugh. Instead, it handed the information over to the White House, allowing those who supported Kavanaugh to falsely claim that the FBI found no wrongdoing.:https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/23/christine-blasey-ford-brett-kavanaugh-investigation-new-details-500652|
Martin68
(22,671 posts)9. Yes, the FBI (and the Secret Service) seem to have lowered standards and let their
professionalism lapse in many instances. But you can bet when the case involves an ex-president who sues anything and anybody at the drop of a hat, they will be dotting all the "i's" and crossing all the "t's."
VMA131Marine
(4,124 posts)6. They definitely should ...
Everyone who would have access to them at the WH would have their fingerprints on file.
Ray Bruns
(4,023 posts)8. They need to check them for ketchup and KFC grease.