Fri May 13, 2016, 02:57 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
And now Debbie Wasserman Shultz won't debate!Just look at her sanctimonious look when Steve asks her about debating, and how she refuses to answer, but actually says 'no' she won't be debating her opponent! Such arrogance. Sending Tim Canova another five dollars!
|
12 replies, 1911 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | OP |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | #1 | |
me b zola | May 2016 | #2 | |
Rass | May 2016 | #3 | |
trof | May 2016 | #10 | |
passiveporcupine | May 2016 | #4 | |
MADem | May 2016 | #5 | |
Post removed | May 2016 | #11 | |
Hortensis | May 2016 | #12 | |
Omaha Steve | May 2016 | #6 | |
floppyboo | May 2016 | #7 | |
Joob | May 2016 | #8 | |
SmittynMo | May 2016 | #9 |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:12 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
1. Kick....to pressure her into debating, something she said before should be natural.
She's too busy running the party, Hillary's campaign, and 'focusing on her constituents', but she has time to go on TV shows nightly.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:12 PM
me b zola (19,053 posts)
2. Whatever that was that was oozing through her pores was noxious
Her and Hillary both. They don't need to campaign they are too powerful for that. Get out of my way!
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:13 PM
Rass (112 posts)
3. Right-wingers don't care about democracy
Right-wingers like Hillary and Shultz simply do not care about democracy. That is a progressive ideal.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:19 PM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
4. already posted
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017370435
![]() She is not saying 'she won't debate him', she just won't answer the question period. She may end up being forced into a debate. I hope so. But I don't even know if I could watch it. Her weasel words are just too hard to listen to. She learned that from Hillary. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:30 PM
MADem (135,425 posts)
5. Well, DUH. The WINNING candidate avoids debates, the LOSING one dogs for/demands them.
That's POLISCI 101. Not rocket science at all.
|
Response to MADem (Reply #5)
Post removed
Response to MADem (Reply #5)
Sat May 14, 2016, 04:06 PM
Hortensis (58,785 posts)
12. Pol Sc 101.
Just what I was going to say.
![]() |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:56 PM
Omaha Steve (95,826 posts)
6. FIRE DWS! Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here
Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova ![]() |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:36 PM
floppyboo (2,461 posts)
7. Go Tim Go!
best wishes in unseating this congresswoman. Can she still be DNC chair if she doesn't have a seat?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:42 PM
Joob (1,065 posts)
8. But debates are GOOD for the PARTY. I thought I heard HER say that.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:03 PM
SmittynMo (3,544 posts)
9. I love it!!!
She's freaking out. Hey, what goes around, comes around. Are you ready Debbie? I mean, omg, 3 times repeating the SOS. She's obviously not ready for prime time.
|