Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumWhy Nature needs to cover politics now more than ever
An Editorial in Nature has recently discussed why scientists must be politically engaged: Why Nature needs to cover politics now more than ever.
It's open sourced; no subscription is required.
For convenience, some excerpts:
Since Natures earliest issues, we have been publishing news, commentary and primary research on science and politics. But why does a journal of science need to cover politics? Its an important question that readers often ask.
This week, Nature reporters outline what the impact on science might be if Joe Biden wins the US presidential election on 3 November, and chronicle President Donald Trumps troubled legacy for science. We plan to increase politics coverage from around the world, and to publish more primary research in political science and related fields.
Science and politics have always depended on each other. The decisions and actions of politicians affect research funding and research-policy priorities. At the same time, science and research inform and shape a spectrum of public policies, from environmental protection to data ethics. The actions of politicians affect the higher-education environment, too. They can ensure that academic freedom is upheld, and commit institutions to work harder to protect equality, diversity and inclusion, and to give more space to voices from previously marginalized communities. However, politicians also have the power to pass laws that do the opposite.
The coronavirus pandemic, which has taken more than one million lives so far, has propelled the sciencepolitics relationship into the public arena as never before, and highlighted some serious problems. COVID-related research is being produced at a rate unprecedented for an infectious disease, and there is, rightly, intense worldwide interest in how political leaders are using science to guide their decisions and how some are misunderstanding, misusing or suppressing it...
...Perhaps even more troubling are signs that politicians are pushing back against the principle of protecting scholarly autonomy, or academic freedom. This principle, which has existed for centuries including in previous civilizations sits at the heart of modern science.
Today, this principle is taken to mean that researchers who access public funding for their work can expect no or very limited interference from politicians in the conduct of their science, or in the eventual conclusions at which they arrive. And that, when politicians and officials seek advice or information from researchers, it is on the understanding that they do not get to dictate the answers...
... Last year, Brazils President Jair Bolsonaro sacked the head of the countrys National Institute for Space Research because the president refused to accept the agencys reports that deforestation in the Amazon has accelerated during his tenure. In the same year, more than 100 economists wrote to Indias prime minister, Narendra Modi, urging an end to political influence over official statistics especially economic data in the country.
And just last week, in Japan, incoming Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga rejected the nomination of six academics, who have previously been critical of government science policy, to the Science Council of Japan. This is an independent organization meant to represent the voice of Japanese scientists. It is the first time that this has happened since prime ministers started approving nominations in 2004...
This week, Nature reporters outline what the impact on science might be if Joe Biden wins the US presidential election on 3 November, and chronicle President Donald Trumps troubled legacy for science. We plan to increase politics coverage from around the world, and to publish more primary research in political science and related fields.
Science and politics have always depended on each other. The decisions and actions of politicians affect research funding and research-policy priorities. At the same time, science and research inform and shape a spectrum of public policies, from environmental protection to data ethics. The actions of politicians affect the higher-education environment, too. They can ensure that academic freedom is upheld, and commit institutions to work harder to protect equality, diversity and inclusion, and to give more space to voices from previously marginalized communities. However, politicians also have the power to pass laws that do the opposite.
The coronavirus pandemic, which has taken more than one million lives so far, has propelled the sciencepolitics relationship into the public arena as never before, and highlighted some serious problems. COVID-related research is being produced at a rate unprecedented for an infectious disease, and there is, rightly, intense worldwide interest in how political leaders are using science to guide their decisions and how some are misunderstanding, misusing or suppressing it...
...Perhaps even more troubling are signs that politicians are pushing back against the principle of protecting scholarly autonomy, or academic freedom. This principle, which has existed for centuries including in previous civilizations sits at the heart of modern science.
Today, this principle is taken to mean that researchers who access public funding for their work can expect no or very limited interference from politicians in the conduct of their science, or in the eventual conclusions at which they arrive. And that, when politicians and officials seek advice or information from researchers, it is on the understanding that they do not get to dictate the answers...
... Last year, Brazils President Jair Bolsonaro sacked the head of the countrys National Institute for Space Research because the president refused to accept the agencys reports that deforestation in the Amazon has accelerated during his tenure. In the same year, more than 100 economists wrote to Indias prime minister, Narendra Modi, urging an end to political influence over official statistics especially economic data in the country.
And just last week, in Japan, incoming Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga rejected the nomination of six academics, who have previously been critical of government science policy, to the Science Council of Japan. This is an independent organization meant to represent the voice of Japanese scientists. It is the first time that this has happened since prime ministers started approving nominations in 2004...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 650 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post