2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDavid Cay Johnston: You agree with Bernie Sanders
Johnston is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter on tax and economic issues who teaches at Syracuse University College of Law.
Worth reading the whole article. Just another reporter with a background on taxes and economic issues (and college professor) who disputes the mainstream meme that Sanders' policies are fantasy.
http://m.nydailynews.com/opinion/david-cay-johnston-agree-bernie-sanders-article-1.2521997
How, can a geriatric Brooklyn-born Jew who speaks in long, complex sentences, his hands providing the punctuation, draw bigger crowds than Donald Trump, despite claiming a tiny fraction of the mogul's TV news coverage? How could he battle Hillary Clinton to a virtual tie in Iowa, with a good chance of beating her Tuesday in New Hampshire? How could he be closing the gap with her in national polls?
The answer is that large majorities of Americans are, like Sanders, "democratic socialists."
Sanders is not a socialist. He is a "democratic socialist." That one word makes for a world of difference. Sanders favors private ownership and markets, but with rules that protect little people from abuses and uncertainties.
<snip>
<snip>
And when hard times come, he wants government to first take care of the little people, not the political donor class, as both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have done. Sanders also wants universal health care, paid for with tax money.
Those who call such ideas radical or outside the mainstream including Hillary Clinton, who asserts Sanders push for universal health care would mean dismantling Obamacare are stretching.
<snip>
More than 80% of Americans support raising taxes if necessary to permanently maintain Social Security, with strong majority support among Republicans, according to surveys by the National Academy of Social Insurance, Social Security Works and others.
This is essentially Sanders' stance. What's so radical about that?
<snip>
Count that $328 as one inch. By that standard the richest 16,000 households have seen their income soar more than a mile.
Almost as bad, the median wage half make more, half less in 2014 was only a dollar a working day more than it was back in 1999. Because the median wage has been stuck at less than $550 a week for so many years, large numbers of workers are worse off now than they were in the last century.
<snip>
It's unlikely we will ever get to test that proposition; Hillary Clinton remains the heavy favorite in the primary, for a host of reasons. But what we do know for sure is that our current elected federal leaders are not pursuing the economic policies that most Americans, including most Republicans, favor.
And those are the policies of the Sanders campaign.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Not no, it's impossible. The incredible lunacy that Bernie just pulled some figures out of the air is preposterous. Pretty sure he owns a calculator and knows how to use it. He just isn't as Packaged Neatly as some candidates. As the OP stresses, it may be beyond the capacity of the average voter to understand. It wouldn't be the first time.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)"Compounding this is the terrible job our education system does teaching young people about economic and political philosophies, to distinguish between the -isms. I've learned that you can have a more informed conversation about politics and economics with the average waiter or petty merchant in Europe or Canada than with the executive sitting next to you on a domestic flight."
Really great article, although I wish he wouldn't use horrid terminology like "little people" and "petty merchant". Sounds freaking feudal.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Uncle Joe
(60,229 posts)Thanks for the thread, Nanjeanne.