HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » 4 Reasons Sanders Can Win...

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:51 PM

4 Reasons Sanders Can Win the General

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jedediah-purdy/four-reasons-sanders-can_b_9198048.html

The New Hampshire primaries, which Bernie Sanders is winning by seventeen points at the time of writing, are the first test of the Clinton campaign's signature attack on Sanders: that he can't win the general election, so a vote for him is a vote for Ted Cruz or Donald Trump. Sanders's large victory suggests that the Clinton strategy didn't work, at least not yet.

But are the Clintons right? Could Sanders win the general election?

Over the weekend, Paul Krugman continued his New York Times campaign against Sanders in a column (on his New York Times blog) citing a Vox article that quoted six academics expressing doubts about Sanders's prospects in a general election. It was part of Krugman's larger crusade to convince readers that voting for Sanders would be an irresponsible capitulation to the heart in a season when the head should be in charge.

I was one of those six "experts." I said that it's hard to realign a party ideologically in a single election: It took 16 years for the New Right to go from Barry Goldwater's loss in 1964 to Ronald Reagan's win in 1980. And I still think that. But I think there are some very sensible reasons weighing on the pro-Sanders side of the equation.

1 replies, 534 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply 4 Reasons Sanders Can Win the General (Original post)
Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 OP
WillyT Feb 2016 #1

Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:26 PM

1. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!

 




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread