Why 'Basta Hillary!' Protestors Say Hillary Has Blood On Her Hands

Hard choices: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup aftermath
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html

Hillary Is Being Misleading About Her Role in the Honduras Coup
When Clinton was secretary of state the U.S. helped overthrow Honduras' elected government. Today the country is in chaos.
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/hillary-being-misleading-about-her-role-honduras-coup

Before Her Assassination, Berta Cáceres Singled Out Hillary Clinton for Backing Honduran Coup
http://m.democracynow.org/stories/16030


Not that I expect you'll actually read any of it.

We're talking about Hillary right now. Keep up.

It also seems to have one source and the same cadre of nutjobs promoting it.

Like this one
http://www.democracynow.org/2016/3/3/honduran_indigenous_leader_berta_caceres_assassinated


This is what a true fighter looks like, this is a person who lived with real conviction.

and I don't google posters here. That is way too creepy. I react to the post in front of me. If I read enough that makes an impression good or bad, then I start to recognize names.

yours does not fit that yet.

How convenient.

I am Latina.

I am in Seattle and still connected to people from the Occupy movement.

The bull that comes on these lily white for the most part boards is not what I weigh my convictions upon.

and your musings aren't enticing enough for me to visit.

Hillary has blood on her hands because you weren't confronted with the fact that she does not and did everything she could to mediate the dispute.

the blood of many from different parts of the globe.

Lots of brown people Gomez. Lots of brown people. Children, women, old people, men ...snuffed out.

She is not responsible for the decisions of Obama as to drones. And I'd like a list of who she "snuffed out."

just for being absolutely annoying, but first. How long had Qaddafi been in power? Fucking decades. The bombed him in the 80s. Is his country better off now?

Hell no.

Regime change, for what purpose? Why Libya? Hell, there is a whole subcontinent that has the blood of thousand free flowing and yet we do fuck all. No we are really only interested in the Middle East and parts of North Africa. Why? Because the most monied people/corporations in the world make money off Oil and the transporting of that.

Where is Honduras?

Close to another canal.


She fronts for the corporations. She doesn't care about the environment. Her saving grace is that she seems to care about women, but does she really? She has hurt more women around the world than most people with her jobs and votes.

And if being confronted with the facts makes you want to put an commenter on ignore, you will never learn or understand and I feel sorry for you.

just because a few American corporations were whining about Zeyala raising the minimum wage doesn't mean Hillary would support a coup.

"The President of Honduras serves a 4-year term and is constitutionally prohibited from re-election. When Zelaya reached the last year of his term, he decided to tinker with the Honduran Constitution. There was reason to believe he intended to remain in office indefinitely.
The US Government Accountability Office compiled a timeline of events that led to the coup:

In October2008, Zelaya proposed postponing the presidential primary elections scheduled for November 16, 2008. (The general election was scheduled to be held a year later in November 2009.)
In January 2009, Zelaya tried to change the composition of the Honduran Supreme Court. Both proposals were strongly opposed by the Honduran National Congress.
In March 2009, Zelaya proposed a referendum asking Hondurans whether to call a constituent assembly for a new Constitution.
In May 2009, after the Honduran courts ruled against the referendum, Zelaya ordered the military to provide the necessary logistics and support to carry it out anyway.
In June 2009, the Honduran Supreme Court ordered the military to desist from supporting the referendum as it would have been unconstitutional. The top military leaders also refused to carry out the logistical support Zelaya ordered and they resigned with the Defense Minister.

Zelaya defied the National Congress, the military, and the Supreme Court and decided to go ahead with the referendum. In the early morning hours of June 28, he was roused from his bed and flown to Costa Rica while he was still in his PJs. The Constitution doesn't have provisions for impeachment. The National Congress simply elected its Speaker, a member of Zelaya's party, to lead the de facto government until the election in November."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/25/1438997/-It-Takes-Fortitude-and-Hillary-Clinton-Has-It-The-Honduras-Edition

with measures that were probably constitutional in themselves but would have violated the constitution had he used them for that purpose. Since he was unconstitutionally overthrown, we can't know whether he would have done that or not.

But just like your candidate, you shamelessly lie.

under the current constitution is not unconstitutional.