Sun Jul 24, 2016, 03:56 PM
SaschaHM (2,897 posts)
Real Leaked Emails and Fake Leaked Emails.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
If you can't find the leaked email on that page, it is fake and posting it here is just spreading malicious information.
|
15 replies, 1778 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
SaschaHM | Jul 2016 | OP |
RandySF | Jul 2016 | #1 | |
apcalc | Jul 2016 | #2 | |
CentralMass | Jul 2016 | #3 | |
NorthCarolina | Jul 2016 | #5 | |
bettyellen | Jul 2016 | #7 | |
CentralMass | Jul 2016 | #8 | |
bettyellen | Jul 2016 | #11 | |
CentralMass | Jul 2016 | #14 | |
SaschaHM | Jul 2016 | #10 | |
still_one | Jul 2016 | #12 | |
OilemFirchen | Jul 2016 | #4 | |
still_one | Jul 2016 | #6 | |
geek tragedy | Jul 2016 | #9 | |
still_one | Jul 2016 | #13 | |
Scuba | Jul 2016 | #15 |
Response to SaschaHM (Original post)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:00 PM
CentralMass (14,524 posts)
3. Is DWS resigning over the real or fake emails ?
Response to CentralMass (Reply #3)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:04 PM
bettyellen (47,209 posts)
7. Are you arguing the RW smears should be given a pass? Sounds like it.
Response to bettyellen (Reply #7)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:07 PM
CentralMass (14,524 posts)
8. I don't read right wing smears and I'm clearly not arguing anything, am I.
I asked a question.
|
Response to CentralMass (Reply #8)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:09 PM
bettyellen (47,209 posts)
11. The fake emails you are hoping we'll avoid discussing are more RW crap.....
Response to bettyellen (Reply #11)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:13 PM
CentralMass (14,524 posts)
14. Again, you you are fabricating things. I am not hoping for anything..
I hope that everyone read as much as possible on everything.
|
Response to CentralMass (Reply #3)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:09 PM
SaschaHM (2,897 posts)
10. DWS is resigning because she's a distraction.
She'll be fine though. She can now focus on latching Canova to Bernie and winning her primary.
|
Response to CentralMass (Reply #3)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:10 PM
still_one (86,956 posts)
12. The DNC chair will resign after the Convention. While in those emails nothing was found that showed
actual interference by the DNC, she has not perform her job as Chair particularly well
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/24/politics/dnc-email-leak-wikileaks/index.html |
Response to SaschaHM (Original post)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:00 PM
OilemFirchen (6,886 posts)
4. For your listening pleasure:
Response to SaschaHM (Original post)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:04 PM
still_one (86,956 posts)
6. White that is a good point, it won't stop people. Also, it appears the DNC Chair will resign, even
though I might add, nothing was found in those emails which showed actual interference by the DNC:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/24/politics/dnc-email-leak-wikileaks/index.html "The leaks, from January 2015 to May 2016, feature Democratic staffers debating everything from how to deal with challenging media requests to coordinating the committee's message with other powerful interests in Washington. The emails were leaked from the accounts of seven DNC officials, Wikileaks said. CNN has not independently established the emails' authenticity. The emails could boost Sanders supporters' charge that the DNC was biased toward Clinton -- a position Sanders himself underscored when he endorsed Wasserman Schultz's primary opponent in her Florida congressional race. But Baltimore mayor and DNC Secretary Stephanie Rawlings-Blake denied any suggestion that Clinton's camp was treated more favorably by the committee. "My expectation is beyond your opinion about a candidate, that you act evenly. All of the officers took a pledge of neutrality and I honored that, and I take that very seriously," Rawlings-Blake told CNN's Poppy Harlow. She added: "I know that the chair will hold those employees accountable if they're found to have acted outside of that neutrality and even-handedness." Asked about the exchanges, Rawlings-Blake said: "Expressing an opinion about a candidate doesn't mean that you're in collusion, doesn't mean that you are actively working against them. And I don't think that that's what it shows." |
Response to SaschaHM (Original post)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:08 PM
geek tragedy (68,868 posts)
9. people who willfully post known hoaxes in an attempt to hurt the democratic
nominee are scumbag trolls who should be banned pronto.
|
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #9)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:11 PM
still_one (86,956 posts)
13. ^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Response to SaschaHM (Original post)
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 04:26 PM
Scuba (53,475 posts)
15. Any fakes, and I saw one, should be removed.