Tue Sep 15, 2015, 12:59 AM
Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)
CLINTON CAMPAIGN SLAMS BERNIE FOR SAVING POOR PEOPLES' LIVES. A SuperPac coordinating with the
Clinton campaign has criticized Bernie Sanders for making a deal with Venezuela to supply discounted fuel to assist the poor during the harsh Vermont winter months. Vermont was one of six states that negotiated for fuel with Venezuela because the U.S. Government was unwilling to supply relief.
A Clinton campaign SuperPac, David Brock's (ex-Republican operative) "Correct the Record" asserts it can legally coordinate with the candidate, and circulated a hit email criticizing Sanders for making a deal that would save lives in his state of Vermont. Super PACs are typically prohibited by law from coordinating with candidates, but Correct the Record will not be a typical super PAC. The group will not run ads, but instead does all of its work online, which it says will allow it to coordinate with the Clinton campaign.
The so-called “Internet exemption” was not intended to be used this way (it was created before the existence of super PACs), the Washington Post notes, but experts say Correct the Record is unlikely to face reprisal. http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-gets-another-super-pac (H/T to DUer virtualobserver)
|
82 replies, 5786 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Luminous Animal | Sep 2015 | OP |
Recursion | Sep 2015 | #1 | |
Skwmom | Sep 2015 | #2 | |
roguevalley | Sep 2015 | #22 | |
virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #3 | |
Luminous Animal | Sep 2015 | #5 | |
virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #6 | |
roguevalley | Sep 2015 | #23 | |
MuseRider | Sep 2015 | #55 | |
Skwmom | Sep 2015 | #4 | |
R. Daneel Olivaw | Sep 2015 | #7 | |
jfern | Sep 2015 | #8 | |
MisterP | Sep 2015 | #9 | |
Betty Karlson | Sep 2015 | #10 | |
frylock | Sep 2015 | #11 | |
rhett o rick | Sep 2015 | #44 | |
Oilwellian | Sep 2015 | #12 | |
MisterP | Sep 2015 | #26 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Sep 2015 | #13 | |
restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #57 | |
elehhhhna | Sep 2015 | #80 | |
restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #82 | |
ram2008 | Sep 2015 | #14 | |
Divernan | Sep 2015 | #29 | |
pnwmom | Sep 2015 | #15 | |
madfloridian | Sep 2015 | #18 | |
pnwmom | Sep 2015 | #20 | |
d_r | Sep 2015 | #77 | |
progree | Sep 2015 | #19 | |
Geronimoe | Sep 2015 | #16 | |
Unknown Beatle | Sep 2015 | #17 | |
imthevicar | Sep 2015 | #21 | |
HooptieWagon | Sep 2015 | #24 | |
beam me up scottie | Sep 2015 | #25 | |
neverforget | Sep 2015 | #27 | |
beam me up scottie | Sep 2015 | #28 | |
neverforget | Sep 2015 | #74 | |
beam me up scottie | Sep 2015 | #75 | |
Warren Stupidity | Sep 2015 | #30 | |
djean111 | Sep 2015 | #31 | |
reformist2 | Sep 2015 | #32 | |
kenfrequed | Sep 2015 | #33 | |
restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #36 | |
jeff47 | Sep 2015 | #34 | |
restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #35 | |
mmonk | Sep 2015 | #37 | |
bunnies | Sep 2015 | #38 | |
Agschmid | Sep 2015 | #39 | |
Luminous Animal | Sep 2015 | #42 | |
jberryhill | Sep 2015 | #61 | |
jberryhill | Sep 2015 | #62 | |
Hell Hath No Fury | Sep 2015 | #40 | |
ancianita | Sep 2015 | #41 | |
bunnies | Sep 2015 | #43 | |
Oilwellian | Sep 2015 | #46 | |
bunnies | Sep 2015 | #49 | |
rhett o rick | Sep 2015 | #45 | |
emsimon33 | Sep 2015 | #47 | |
Darb | Sep 2015 | #48 | |
Uncle Joe | Sep 2015 | #50 | |
jwirr | Sep 2015 | #51 | |
TDale313 | Sep 2015 | #52 | |
Darb | Sep 2015 | #53 | |
historylovr | Sep 2015 | #56 | |
jberryhill | Sep 2015 | #60 | |
historylovr | Sep 2015 | #65 | |
jberryhill | Sep 2015 | #66 | |
historylovr | Sep 2015 | #71 | |
Go Vols | Sep 2015 | #72 | |
historylovr | Sep 2015 | #73 | |
jeff47 | Sep 2015 | #78 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Sep 2015 | #54 | |
Vinca | Sep 2015 | #58 | |
reformist2 | Sep 2015 | #63 | |
restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #59 | |
Enthusiast | Sep 2015 | #68 | |
restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #69 | |
Catherina | Sep 2015 | #64 | |
jberryhill | Sep 2015 | #67 | |
Babel_17 | Sep 2015 | #70 | |
cantbeserious | Sep 2015 | #76 | |
LittleBlue | Sep 2015 | #79 | |
portlander23 | Sep 2015 | #81 |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Recursion This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:05 AM
Skwmom (12,685 posts)
2. Clinton Super Pac: Let them eat cake
Last edited Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:17 AM - Edit history (1) or Let them freeze... |
Response to Skwmom (Reply #2)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:09 AM
roguevalley (40,656 posts)
22. fuck them. that should resonate. Again, the compelling difference between the two
she would let people die before taking a risk to save them. She either disavows them or she will wear this as her own.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:07 AM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
3. Hillary is running scared- this is a sign of weakness
I guess her record and her proposals aren't enough to get votes.
She can't even attack his proposals.... The Bush administration was leaving the poor high and dry in 2006. Bernie took action to help the poor, and Hillary attacks him for it. |
Response to virtualobserver (Reply #3)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:19 AM
Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)
5. Thanks for reminding me that Brock's Super Pac can "legally" coordinate with Hillary.
Nice big fat loophole they've got there.
(Yeah. Right, Hillary… you want to get money out of politics.) |
Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #5)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:26 AM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
6. I just found that out tonight
I was unaware that it was even possible.
Of course, none of her Supers would really act without understanding exactly what she wanted......she could easily telegraph that through public statements...but this makes it clear as crystal- she is behind this. |
Response to virtualobserver (Reply #6)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:16 AM
roguevalley (40,656 posts)
23. ex republican operative. why am I not surprised.
Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #5)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:35 PM
MuseRider (33,258 posts)
55. Didn't take long to find that low bar
and crawl under it.
One would think this is bad for her. With people being so weary of Clinton crap and all the stuff that we will have to rehash and everything that will be held up because of it they will not be wanting to see this kind of thing coming from anything Clinton. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:10 AM
Skwmom (12,685 posts)
4. Oh that radical Bernie, he actual wants the poor to keep warm and not freeze. Can you imagine that?
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:32 AM
R. Daneel Olivaw (12,606 posts)
7. The flameout is going to be spectacular methinks.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:35 AM
jfern (5,204 posts)
8. That's some true scumbags there
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:46 AM
MisterP (23,730 posts)
9. pseudo-populism, repression, speeding up to avoid any real questions, unstated promises that every
problem will be solved if you just vote for them, neoliberals letting all the country's money bleed out, politics reduced to a squabble over a money source
nope, can't think of anyone like THAT! ![]() |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:04 AM
Betty Karlson (7,231 posts)
10. So the new poll numbers are not that great for camp Clinton, then? n/t
Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #10)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:06 AM
frylock (34,825 posts)
11. I can't imagine how bad her internal polling looks.
Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #10)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:25 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
44. Bingo!
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:07 AM
Oilwellian (12,647 posts)
12. Wow, what a stunningly stupid attack
This will highlight a good thing Bernie did for the poor and elderly in his state. How can Hillary's campaign be so obtuse?
I will take this opportunity and thank them for their incredible blunder. Apparently they think helping the poor and the elderly is a bad thing. Imagine that. |
Response to Oilwellian (Reply #12)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:08 AM
MisterP (23,730 posts)
26. that's how they think: this goes beyond them siding with the guarimbas, but genuinely believing that
we'd all forget an everyday, at-home, pocketbook thing like cheaper oil in favor of some loathing of the assigned enemy du jour: everyone inside the Beltway hates Caracas, so any (real) American would flee headlong at the mere suggestion of association with those beef-chomping gauchos as though it was OBL himself
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:10 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
13. Yeah, because Chavez is Satan and stuff.....
.....uh huh.......
Déjà vu... ![]() |
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #13)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:46 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
57. and i thought my cheney nightmares couldn't get any worse
lol though
|
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #57)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 09:55 PM
elehhhhna (32,076 posts)
80. they're about to get even worse:
![]() |
Response to elehhhhna (Reply #80)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:58 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
82. my eyes!!!!! nt
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:12 AM
ram2008 (1,238 posts)
14. All those millions of dollars wasted...
All these petty attacks will do is make sure Hillary has plenty of time to spend with her Grandchild over the next few years.
|
Response to ram2008 (Reply #14)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:51 AM
Divernan (15,480 posts)
29. When her fundraising peaks, she can quit the race & keep all that money
for her NEXT campaign. She'll always be dangling that next campaign in front of her corporate backers, because when there's no possibility of her claiming the Oval Office and playing the quid-pro-quo game, all those corporate/foreign government "donations" (cough-bribes-cough) to the boutique, 5 star Clinton Family Foundation will come to a screeching halt. Thank Gawd! the Clintons have amassed enough millions since leaving the White House to keep them firmly in the One Percent. And One Percenters do not do hands on child raising - that's what Nannies are for!
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:18 AM
pnwmom (107,638 posts)
15. The link doesn't say anything about a Venezuelan oil deal. Where did that info come from?n/t
Response to pnwmom (Reply #15)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:48 AM
madfloridian (88,117 posts)
18. Here's the Huff Post article link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-jeremy-corbyn_55f73339e4b00e2cd5e79e11
WASHINGTON -- A super PAC backing Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is going negative, circulating an email that yokes her chief rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) to some of the more controversial remarks made by Jeremy Corbyn, the United Kingdom's new Labour Party leader, including his praise for the late Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan leader who provided discounted fuel to Vermont in a deal supported by Sanders. |
Response to madfloridian (Reply #18)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 09:17 PM
d_r (6,885 posts)
77. what does this mean?
Sorry if I'm an idiot.
Correct the Record, led by Clinton ally David Brock, also has sent trackers after Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley. |
Response to pnwmom (Reply #15)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:51 AM
progree (10,129 posts)
19. I was wondering the same thing. Here's one
and the only one in a quick Google search
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-jeremy-corbyn_55f73339e4b00e2cd5e79e11 Frankly I haven't read most of it, and probably won't for awhile, its late, and I'm having Internet connection issues or something. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:36 AM
Geronimoe (1,539 posts)
16. Feel the Bern
In 2006, Venezuela and Vermont struck a deal that would supply heating oil to low-income Vermont residents at a 40 percent discount, with an additional 108,000 gallons going to homeless shelters for free.
Back around 2002-2003, Chavez sent oil to Native Alaskan Villages that couldn't afford to heat homes and schools. The State of Alaska with billions in their kitty oil fund and Federal Government refused to help. Chavez said at the time that he supports all indigenous people. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:44 AM
Unknown Beatle (2,643 posts)
17. So Hillary is thinking and acting like a republican.
No surprise there.
She has the gift of gab, that is, depending on which direction the political wind is blowing at the time, she'll say what people want to hear. Responding to the death of Muammar Ghadafi, Hillary Clinton says, "We came, we saw, he died" and then immediately after her statement, she laughs. I guess someone being killed is funny to her, but to the rest of us, not so much. And she wants to be president of the US. Scary. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:07 AM
imthevicar (811 posts)
21. Wave those Colors Hillery!
Your true ones of course. Well at least you'll have lots of time to spend with you grandchildren over the next few years.
And to Mr. Sanders, Please continue to run a clean campaign, it suites you, and has served you well. A word of advice though, You may be a friend to Hillery But Hillery ain't your friend. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:51 AM
HooptieWagon (17,064 posts)
24. Clinton expects poor people to freeze to death.
Not unexpected. The Swiftboat attack coordinated by her campaign isn't unexpected. It's what scumbag pols do when their internals are bad. Anyone remember Rev Wright or the beginning of Birtherism?
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:03 AM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
25. They're getting worried.
I wonder when they'll recycle the 'Bernie protected pedophiles' meme?
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #25)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:13 AM
neverforget (9,421 posts)
27. A new one will pop up and be added to the rotation.
Gotta keep'em fresh ya know?
|
Response to neverforget (Reply #27)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:40 AM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
28. Yep.
They're working on the next swift boat as we speak.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #28)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 08:33 PM
neverforget (9,421 posts)
74. I think we found it: spending.
Response to neverforget (Reply #74)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 08:48 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
75. EEEEK! Bernie's gonna tax us to death!
All to pay for our ponies and free college.
![]() Too funny! |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:10 AM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
30. So we should expect a non-stop series of red baiting attacks here.
It is good to know what the theme of the week is.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:12 AM
djean111 (14,255 posts)
31. "Correct the Record" is nothing more than "Scrub Hillary's Record". That is what it was
created for. And I read something about Hillary's campaign being VERY interested in new rules proposed by the GOP to enable the super PACs to work directly with the candidates. Have to check that out later.
Correct the Record is about as on the up and up as the Koch's "Americans for prosperity (of the Kochs)". To me, it is no more valid to link to than to link to Breitbart. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:16 AM
reformist2 (9,841 posts)
32. Isn't this the way a Repug might attack a Liberal? This can only help Bernie with Dems.
If any political operative thinks that Hugo Chavez is some sort of universally hated historical figure, they are sadly mistaken. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 08:10 AM
kenfrequed (7,865 posts)
33. Are they trying to backfire?
This isn't going to convince anyone of anything other than Bernie being "against poor people freezing to death."
|
Response to kenfrequed (Reply #33)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:15 AM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
36. a freakin men
they better hold on to something when the blowback comes.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:10 AM
jeff47 (26,549 posts)
34. Team Clinton's internal polling must be abysmal. (nt)
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:15 AM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
35. this is from the gop handbook
poor people don t matter, when are we going to get that through our heads?
oh wait, this is a dem candidate? (scratching head) |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:41 AM
mmonk (52,589 posts)
37. There are a few ghosts of McCarthy.
They reappear every election season.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 11:45 AM
bunnies (15,859 posts)
38. Come up to New England and spend a fucking winter with no goddamn heat.
I've done it. And whomever thought of this brilliant "attack" can go fuck themselves. Twice. Fucking republicans are the only ones who didnt want our states to have assistance.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 11:46 AM
Agschmid (28,749 posts)
39. Is someone going to post the actual letter/email?
I'd like to see it.
|
Response to Agschmid (Reply #39)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 12:44 PM
Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)
42. Here is the link to the article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-jeremy-corbyn_55f73339e4b00e2cd5e79e11
WASHINGTON -- A super PAC backing Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is going negative, circulating an email that yokes her chief rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) to some of the more controversial remarks made by Jeremy Corbyn, the United Kingdom's new Labour Party leader, including his praise for the late Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan leader who provided discounted fuel to Vermont in a deal supported by Sanders.
Clinton's camp has long said it has no plans to attack Sanders. But the super PAC, called Correct the Record, departed from its defense of Clinton's record as a former secretary of state in an email Monday that compares Sanders with Corbyn. Correct the Record, led by Clinton ally David Brock, also has sent trackers after Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley. The more serious stretch comes as the email highlights how Sanders helped negotiate a program with Venezuela's national oil company in 2006 that provided discounted heating oil assistance to low-income Vermonters. The senator said it was "not a partisan issue," in the state, which was the sixth to make the deal. His support for the program was apparently enough to merit a mention, since Corbyn has written that the late Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez's "electoral democratic credentials are beyond reproach." |
Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #42)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:20 PM
jberryhill (62,444 posts)
61. "Is someone going to post the actual letter/email?"
That's a really longwinded way of saying "no". |
Response to Agschmid (Reply #39)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:23 PM
jberryhill (62,444 posts)
62. No
The article contradicts itself twice - first saying that the email is "being circulated", then saying it was sent to one person in response to an article, and then saying "it remains to be seen whether the gist of the email from Correct the Record will be fed to anyone other than reporters". So, the story is: One Huffpo reporter got an email, the text of which that reporter is not revealing. The author of the article then claims, with no basis, that the email is "being circulated" and then states that it is unknown whether its "gist" was sent to anyone else. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 12:27 PM
Hell Hath No Fury (16,327 posts)
40. Of all the things to try and bring Sanders down with --
they go with this???
![]() ![]() Dear Clinton Camp: Keep it up. It's EXACTLY this kind of shit that swung me to Obama in 2008. Signed, Now You're Pissing Me Off ![]() |
Response to Hell Hath No Fury (Reply #40)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 12:29 PM
ancianita (30,830 posts)
41. RIGHT?
![]() |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:06 PM
bunnies (15,859 posts)
43. New York took the oil too.
Response to bunnies (Reply #43)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:31 PM
Oilwellian (12,647 posts)
46. You mean while Hillary was Senator of NY?
LOL...well isn't that RICH! Thank you for looking that up.
|
Response to Oilwellian (Reply #46)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:37 PM
bunnies (15,859 posts)
49. Yep. Thats the time!
Nothing but the best and brightest working for that HRC!
![]() |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:29 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
45. k & r. Thanks for posting. nm
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:35 PM
emsimon33 (3,128 posts)
47. Pretty desperate
If the worse you can say is that a politician actually worked for the good of his constituents.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:36 PM
Darb (2,807 posts)
48. Without the actual email, all I see is speculation and inference during primary politics at a time
when the media is desperate, and probably instructed, to create a horse race everywhere they might, by hook or by crook.
Attack me now if you must, but please include the email in question. Thanks. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:40 PM
Uncle Joe (55,210 posts)
50. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Luminous Animal.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:44 PM
jwirr (39,215 posts)
51. If I am not mistaken the program that recieved and
distributed the heating fuel was led by Joseph Kennedy. And many states, reservations and urban poor were the recipients of the program. I have been one of those recipients through the Energy Assistance Program in my state.
Keep digging Hillary. The poor vote to. Thank you Bernie I did not know about your participation in the charity. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:46 PM
TDale313 (7,758 posts)
52. Typical nasty campaigning from the Clintons.
When they start feeling desperate, there's no attack too ugly. I have not forgiven the dog whistles of '08.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:49 PM
Darb (2,807 posts)
53. Got the email? Otherwise your title is for shit.
I'd like to see for myself how the Clinton campaign "slams Bernie for saving poor people's lives". I understand hyoperbole, believe me, so no big. But at least lets see the actual email so that we can make a judgement about this "slam".
Ok? Shouldn't be too much trouble right, since you obviously read it before you posted this hysterical claim, no? Thanks. |
Response to Darb (Reply #53)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:44 PM
historylovr (1,557 posts)
56. The link to the article is posted up thread.
Response to historylovr (Reply #56)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:18 PM
jberryhill (62,444 posts)
60. What is the text of the email
Your reply is non-responsive. The question is "where is the email". Yes, the link to the article is posted up thread. The email is not in the article. The article further contradicts itself - first saying that the email is "being circulated", then saying it was sent to one person in response to an article, and then saying "it remains to be seen whether the gist of the email from Correct the Record will be fed to anyone other than reporters". So, how about just admitting you have NO CLUE what the emails says or to whom it was sent? |
Response to jberryhill (Reply #60)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:26 PM
historylovr (1,557 posts)
65. Whoa, wow.
I just pointed out the link had been posted. It looks as if, no, after looking more cloly there is no link to or text of the email there. Mea maxima culpa.
|
Response to historylovr (Reply #65)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:37 PM
jberryhill (62,444 posts)
66. Isn't that interesting, though?
We have this OP saying the PAC "circulated a hit email", and no email in sight. Kinda weird. |
Response to jberryhill (Reply #66)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:11 PM
historylovr (1,557 posts)
71. Would be helpful if Huffington Post
would disclose the full text of it, as it claims to have received it. Even actual block quotes. It's being reported in other places too. Or, as is the case these days, copy-pasted.
|
Response to historylovr (Reply #71)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:18 PM
Go Vols (5,902 posts)
72. I can't find text to the Sanders camp response either
Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs wrote in an email to The Huffington Post that Correct the Record was "distorting the record." The Sanders campaign has argued that attacks from Clinton supporters are inspired by anxiety over his leads in polls of Democratic voters in Iowa and New Hampshire.
"It is disappointing that Secretary Clinton's super PAC is spreading disinformation about Bernie," Briggs wrote. "This is exactly the kind of politics that Bernie is trying to change. To equate bringing home heating oil to low-income Vermonters with support for the Chavez government is dishonest." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-jeremy-corbyn_55f73339e4b00e2cd5e79e11 |
Response to Go Vols (Reply #72)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:41 PM
historylovr (1,557 posts)
73. I'm sure both would make interesting reading though.
![]() |
Response to Darb (Reply #53)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 09:38 PM
jeff47 (26,549 posts)
78. Would Brock going on TV and confirming the story be good enough for you?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251596835
Oh wait....you'd insist it wasn't true even if you had the email itself. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:17 PM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
54. Red Scares are soooooo1950's.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:50 PM
Vinca (49,169 posts)
58. I remember that well since I live right next door to Vermont and many, many people
need assistance with heating oil in the winter months. It's always been just one more thing that makes me like Bernie so much. I'm astonished it would be a point of criticism. As I recall, one of the Kennedys was also involved in deals with Venezuela to provide affordable heating oil to people. Was it Joe Kennedy? I forget, but apparently the Kennedys are now persona non grata amongst the Hillary people, too.
|
Response to Vinca (Reply #58)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:27 PM
reformist2 (9,841 posts)
63. Yep. Kennedy even ran ads about his program here in Mass, thanking "our friends in Venezuela!"
Take that HRC & SuperPacs!
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:53 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
59. i think elaine benes said it best
“You know, sometimes when I think you’re the shallowest man I’ve ever met, you manage to drain a little more out of the pool.” ![]() |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #59)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 06:33 PM
Enthusiast (50,983 posts)
68. There seems to be a Seinfeld quote for every situation.
![]() |
Response to Enthusiast (Reply #68)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 06:40 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
69. i know, i always tell people that! nt
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:32 PM
Catherina (35,568 posts)
64. Another brilliant miscalculation that will solidify the huge millennial vote for Bernie
as well as other Democrats who are sick of this kind of shit. This ranks right up there with their misteps 8 years ago.
And they say with age comes wisdom. "because the U.S. Government was unwilling to supply relief" YO Mr Brock! That's exactly what Bernie's here to fix. Negotiations for the good of the American people instead of wars to steal other people's resources. Please keep it up. You're so behind the times it's comical. I love it. Hillary's campaign is writing its own attack ads. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:42 PM
jberryhill (62,444 posts)
67. "circulated a hit email" - bullshit
Circulated to whom? This article uses a good deal of bullshit to give an impression that is not supported by its own facts. It specifically refers to one email sent to one person in response to an article. It does not identify the recipient of the email. It does not identify anyone else who got this "circulated" email, nor does it contain the actual text of the email. Jiminy Christmas, it must have been one of the emails on Clinton's server. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 06:44 PM
Babel_17 (5,400 posts)
70. And this looked like a smart move
This was driven exclusively by old school thinking. Nothing against being "old school" but apparently those behind this are operating in an echo chamber devoid of people who can/will point out the downside to this scheme. This is the world where tawdry endeavors like this get held up for scrutiny, and mockery.
I could go on a rant but I think the lack of judgement going on here is going to speak for itself, soon enough. |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 08:52 PM
cantbeserious (13,039 posts)
76. How Low Will HRC Go
eom
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 09:45 PM
LittleBlue (10,362 posts)
79. This reeks of desperation
This story is old, dead and buried years ago. Voters aren't going to be swayed by it. Most Americans couldn't find Venezuela on a map.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:27 PM
portlander23 (2,078 posts)
81. dark money
![]() |