Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:43 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
"Single payer because other countries do it"
Is that enough to get people to vote for your candidate.
Someone says "well let's take a closer look at that." Oh no! You lurched to the right! Hell you look at a used car closer before you buy it than you do at Bernie's ideas.
|
82 replies, 4429 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | OP |
ibegurpard | Nov 2015 | #1 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #5 | |
newfie11 | Nov 2015 | #37 | |
yeoman6987 | Nov 2015 | #48 | |
newfie11 | Nov 2015 | #50 | |
yeoman6987 | Nov 2015 | #51 | |
Kentonio | Nov 2015 | #69 | |
yeoman6987 | Nov 2015 | #70 | |
Kentonio | Nov 2015 | #72 | |
HerbChestnut | Nov 2015 | #45 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #2 | |
bobbobbins01 | Nov 2015 | #3 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #9 | |
bobbobbins01 | Nov 2015 | #10 | |
arcane1 | Nov 2015 | #18 | |
Matariki | Nov 2015 | #49 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #4 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #11 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #23 | |
Ron Green | Nov 2015 | #33 | |
newfie11 | Nov 2015 | #40 | |
Broward | Nov 2015 | #6 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #12 | |
Broward | Nov 2015 | #17 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #7 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #8 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #14 | |
AgingAmerican | Nov 2015 | #16 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #24 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #65 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #80 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #81 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #82 | |
arcane1 | Nov 2015 | #13 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #19 | |
arcane1 | Nov 2015 | #22 | |
bobbobbins01 | Nov 2015 | #25 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #26 | |
AgingAmerican | Nov 2015 | #15 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #21 | |
bobbobbins01 | Nov 2015 | #27 | |
AgingAmerican | Nov 2015 | #30 | |
reformist2 | Nov 2015 | #20 | |
PatrickforO | Nov 2015 | #28 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #29 | |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | #32 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #35 | |
99Forever | Nov 2015 | #31 | |
Scootaloo | Nov 2015 | #34 | |
enid602 | Nov 2015 | #79 | |
Warren DeMontague | Nov 2015 | #36 | |
slipslidingaway | Nov 2015 | #61 | |
TIME TO PANIC | Nov 2015 | #38 | |
BootinUp | Nov 2015 | #39 | |
TIME TO PANIC | Nov 2015 | #42 | |
BootinUp | Nov 2015 | #44 | |
MaggieD | Nov 2015 | #41 | |
Name removed | Nov 2015 | #57 | |
MaggieD | Nov 2015 | #60 | |
Name removed | Nov 2015 | #62 | |
MaggieD | Nov 2015 | #63 | |
NorthCarolina | Nov 2015 | #43 | |
sadoldgirl | Nov 2015 | #46 | |
Doctor_J | Nov 2015 | #47 | |
longship | Nov 2015 | #52 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #64 | |
longship | Nov 2015 | #66 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #67 | |
longship | Nov 2015 | #68 | |
Kentonio | Nov 2015 | #71 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #73 | |
Kentonio | Nov 2015 | #74 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #75 | |
Kentonio | Nov 2015 | #76 | |
Recursion | Nov 2015 | #78 | |
Warren Stupidity | Nov 2015 | #53 | |
tazkcmo | Nov 2015 | #54 | |
99Forever | Nov 2015 | #55 | |
jeff47 | Nov 2015 | #56 | |
MrMickeysMom | Nov 2015 | #58 | |
Avalux | Nov 2015 | #59 | |
merrily | Nov 2015 | #77 |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:46 PM
ibegurpard (16,685 posts)
1. single payer because our system is fucked beyond repair
And other countries have EITHER single payer or single payer hybrids that work well and keep costs down. AND they don't saddle their small businesses with the cost.
|
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #1)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:51 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
5. How do I know what you are saying is real?
I have never seen a white paper or anything about single payer for the United States.
What is wrong with getting the real data before making a choice? |
Response to upaloopa (Reply #5)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:40 PM
newfie11 (8,159 posts)
37. What we have now is terrible
There are countries using single player now and are extremely happy with it.
I guess for research look at how those countries manage it. |
Response to newfie11 (Reply #37)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:01 PM
yeoman6987 (14,449 posts)
48. There are many in America that like our system now
I am one of them. We don't have to change again after ACA is hitting its stride. Most poor and working class have decent health care now.
|
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #48)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:07 PM
newfie11 (8,159 posts)
50. I'm on Medicare and ChampVA
So I could care less what America does.
|
Response to newfie11 (Reply #50)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:09 PM
yeoman6987 (14,449 posts)
51. Does the majority like their Heath care? Yes. Democracy works
You and I get one vote.
|
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #48)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:06 AM
Kentonio (4,377 posts)
69. If you like what you have now
Unless you're extremely wealthy, then you probably have never experienced a universal healthcare system. Its not just about having coverage, its about the whole process of using the system.
Imagine getting ill, and the only thing you have to focus on is getting well again. Never having to spend even a second worrying about deductibles or whether this or that treatment is covered under your plan. Never having to fill out a form or make calls to your insurance. Just see a doctor, get treatment and go home. The difference that makes is priceless. |
Response to Kentonio (Reply #69)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:10 AM
yeoman6987 (14,449 posts)
70. Well actually I did use the Italian program
It was free but in 2011, the still used bottles for IVs and had older technology then we do for operations. Did I survive? Yes. But with universal health care their is a price in not necessarily getting the frills. Maybe we don't need them. I also am not sure how Americans would like being in wards with 8 other patients. We'll see.
|
Response to yeoman6987 (Reply #70)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:16 AM
Kentonio (4,377 posts)
72. Hmm..
I don't want to offend any Italians, but Italy is.. lets just say its not the best example to use of anything involving the state..
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #5)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:52 PM
HerbChestnut (3,649 posts)
45. Do. Your. Research.
Economic reports are a good place to start.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
NurseJackie This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:50 PM
bobbobbins01 (1,681 posts)
3. How about this...
When a democratic candidate says lets increase our airstrikes, get an authorization for use of military force, and claims Iran and ISIS are part of the same problem, we should all stop and say "well let's take a closer look at that."
Your candidate is pushing for war and you're trying to argue against healthcare for all Americans. You should "take a closer look" at your priorities. |
Response to bobbobbins01 (Reply #3)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:55 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
9. I agree. I expect experts to critique each
candidate's military positions.
I invite a critique of Hillary's speech by experts |
Response to upaloopa (Reply #9)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:56 PM
bobbobbins01 (1,681 posts)
10. What a cop out.
Think for yourself. Do you want more war or not?
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #9)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:04 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
18. What are experts saying about our appalling health care system?
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:50 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
4. Uh, yeah
No.
Nice try. It's because our health care costs, drug prices and medical system is screwed up. If you want to live in a society where education and health care are things funded by your tax dollars, so do I. If you want to live in a society where millions are unable to afford health care or have become indentured servants to pay off their education, while funding blowing up people in other countries, I do not. Pick one. I do not pick option #2, and it is, indeed, quite a bunch of #2. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #4)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:58 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
11. Sorry those are not our only choices
As I said nobody that I know of has put together a report on what single payer in the US would look like or cost.
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #11)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:08 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
23. Actually, yes, they are.
You can gild the lily all day long, but those are the facts.
You can pretend all day long that there is a study to prolong the obvious, but that is all that it is. Prolonging the obvious and many of us are tired of waiting for those who want nothing better to quit stalling. We either do things differently, or we keep doing to the same shit that is destroying far too many Americans. I'm in the "do things differently" wing. Anybody that wants to be in the "maybe things will improve if I stall long enough" camp can wait for the magical study that shows unicorns can shit rainbows + how bombing some other people somehow improves lives, can talk to the hand. |
Response to upaloopa (Reply #11)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:26 PM
Ron Green (9,754 posts)
33. Please don't be a dumbass.
http://www.pnhp.org/
http://fixithealthcare.com/ http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=8638 There's been tons of good study and work on US single-payer. |
Response to Ron Green (Reply #33)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:43 PM
newfie11 (8,159 posts)
40. Thank you! Nt
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:51 PM
Broward (1,976 posts)
6. Your conservatism is showing.
Response to Broward (Reply #6)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:01 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
12. What does that even mean?
If it is meant to put me down you lose.
Is it conservative to try to understand single payer? If so conservatives are smarter than us. |
Response to upaloopa (Reply #12)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:04 PM
Broward (1,976 posts)
17. Sure, that's what you're doing. Trying to understand single payer.
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:53 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
7. But that would be SOSHIALISM!!!! Plus, they would tax the Middle Class!11!!!
Ever try to live on only $250,000 a year???????
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 06:55 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
8. not because other countries do it
because health care is not a commodity to be purchased by the wealthy but a basic right for all people in a civilized country.
single payer because its the right thing to do. |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #8)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:02 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
14. Do any of you ever look any deeper than words?
My god!
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #14)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:04 PM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
16. WE do
But obviously YOU don't.
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #14)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:09 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
24. what would you like me to look at?
the obscene cost of meds and procedures?
the high infant and mother mortality rate? the high rate of completely preventable disease and death? people having to choose between medicine and heat? thousands upon thousands dying because can't afford basic care? the greedy pharma and insurance system that cares more about profits than lives? what other aspects of the wonderful u.s. health care system should i be looking at? |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #8)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 08:26 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
65. Then why do so few countries do it?
It's not remotely common.
|
Response to Recursion (Reply #65)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 10:15 AM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
80. most modern countries
do not have the predatory insurance/big pharma system we have. it takes different forms, but "socialized medicine", single payer, government sponsored, in some form is in most other modern countries. people do not have to choose between heat and meds. except us.
|
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #80)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 10:20 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
81. Yep. But we're committed to dying on the hill of being just like Canada
When there's an OECD full of other ways to get to the same goal, which are more politically obtainable.
|
Response to Recursion (Reply #81)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 11:45 AM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
82. i dn't know what oecd means...
but i generally agree. i would like to see people have low cost affordable health care for all without the greedy stranglehold of insurance companies and big pharma. profit and medicine have to be untwined. i think medicare for all is a good way, but if people have other ideas to get there, i am willing to listen.
what are you thinking would be a good option? |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:02 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
13. Strawman. And a lame one at that. Single Payer because it's the best option. It works.
There, I fixed it for you.
|
Response to arcane1 (Reply #13)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:04 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
19. You haven't done shit. People are not willing to vote for that
I may be offering the best political advice you'll ever get! Explain it to people don't expect them to vote for an ideal!
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #19)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:07 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
22. I thought you wanted to listen to experts, not DUers
![]() |
Response to upaloopa (Reply #19)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:11 PM
bobbobbins01 (1,681 posts)
25. So now its because people won't vote for it?
You're making a whole lot of excuses against something that would benefit everyone. Why?
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #19)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:12 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
26. Oh. I see
Telling everyone to "wait, things will get better" when for many they have gotten worse or at the very least not improved works out so well.
Hang on a minute folks - all we have to do is nothing but what we have been doing, and suddenly things will all turn out differently. ![]() There's a term for that. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:02 PM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
15. Cheaper with better outcomes
Not beholden to psychopathic middlemen.
|
Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #15)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:06 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
21. You'll stay at 25% to 30% with that
If you are going to move people you have to prove to them that what you say makes sense.
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:13 PM
bobbobbins01 (1,681 posts)
27. You said yourself that single payer was the ideal
Why would you actively fight against the ideal? Shouldn't you fight for it?
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:23 PM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
30. Coming from you that is meaningless
Because you obviously haven't read his basic proposals.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:06 PM
reformist2 (9,841 posts)
20. The current system - ObamaRomneycare - is not working.
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:14 PM
PatrickforO (13,953 posts)
28. I want single payer and have for decades. The only thing that makes any sense
is to expand the Medicare infrastructure for everyone and not tie it to employment.
My life, and the lives of most other people posting on here, including yours, upaloopa, would be better if this were the case. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:15 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
29. Hey, do you think you could
come up with a spin on how breathing oxygen is bad for you?
Because it sounds like you are working up to that particular pinnacle. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #29)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:26 PM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
32. Can you explain how we put single payer in place
and what it costs and how we pay for it?
|
Response to upaloopa (Reply #32)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:32 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
35. You first - tell me why breathing oxygen is bad. n/t
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:26 PM
99Forever (14,524 posts)
31. Said......
....nobody....
....ever. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:27 PM
Scootaloo (25,699 posts)
34. Well, we examine two things.
1) Why do other countries do it?
Ask 'em. Any answer other than a blank stare of mild confusion that someone would ask, will follow hte lins of "because people need to have health care. Being healthy is a human right." 2) [What is the net effect in these other countries? Fact is, people in these countries with single payer tend to be healthier, less-stressed, and actually have more money - even with the increase in taxation to fund the programs, they still end up paying less individually than they would (and we do) under privatized health care. Yet they get equal, if not better medical service. Not just that, but everyone is covered. Take as close a look as you want. You'll find that it's the right thing to do, and that the benefits far outweigh the costs. |
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #34)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 10:03 AM
enid602 (7,726 posts)
79. Medicare for all
But then, you have to ask, why doesn't Europe have single payer? They don't you know, and the EU is comparable to the US in terms of population and GDP. Sure, each country within the EU has some form of Universal Healthcare, and for that I applaud them. Germany, for example has had universal healthcare since 1848, when much of our economy was based on slavery.
But while England does have 'Medicare for all,' the rest do not. Many countries, such as France, have healthcare that is administered solely through insurance companies, and they seem to be doing well. Medicare is already the largest single payer in the world, bar none. To say it can be tripled in scope easily is simplistic. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:39 PM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
36. She laid out a big ol case for expansive and endless war, & more warrantless surveillance; combined
With the sort of unchecked "security tools for law enforcement" that are sold to the public as vital for terror-fighting --- and end up getting used to spy on granny in case she has a pot plant growing in her basement to ease her chemo nausea.
Is that "rightward" enough for ya? |
Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #36)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 01:09 AM
slipslidingaway (21,210 posts)
61. You need to speak up for a cause and we know the cause :( n/t
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:41 PM
TIME TO PANIC (1,894 posts)
38. Single payer because we can
and it's the moral thing to do! |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:41 PM
BootinUp (43,972 posts)
39. We don't want to think too hard
Lets just try to elect someone that bashes capitalism.
|
Response to BootinUp (Reply #39)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:48 PM
TIME TO PANIC (1,894 posts)
42. I heard that same comment on Fox News.
Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #42)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:51 PM
BootinUp (43,972 posts)
44. care to expand your thoughts?
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:46 PM
MaggieD (7,393 posts)
41. About 50% of voters support single payer
I think that would drop once people realized they'd have to pay at least an increase of 10% in federal taxes (FICA portion, so no exemption or deduction).
Not to mention congress won't even let it get out of committee. Bernie is not a realistic guy. That's why he has little to nothing to show for 25 years in congress. |
Response to MaggieD (Reply #41)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #57)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 01:03 AM
MaggieD (7,393 posts)
60. No, your current FICA is 8% so would be 18%
.... under Bernie's plan. Math. That's why he won't tell you about how it is paid for. And while you may be fine with it the reality is most people won't be, and no one in congress will be. It is a HUGE increase in taxes.
|
Response to MaggieD (Reply #60)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #62)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 01:19 AM
MaggieD (7,393 posts)
63. He won't mention it because he knows....
A tax increase more than doubling FICA taxes will not be supported by congress or the American people. At what point do you folks join us in reality land? I don't mean to be rude in any way, but why are you so intent on a politician that promises nothing more than ponies that will never be delivered?
How does that help ANYONE? |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:51 PM
NorthCarolina (11,197 posts)
43. Because the discussion is over. Single payer is clearly the best way forward. eom
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:58 PM
sadoldgirl (3,431 posts)
46. I suggest that you go to Canada,
and ask the people whether they would like
to go back to their individual health insurance plans or to something like the ACA. I am sure that you would cause a lot of laughter with that proposal. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 07:59 PM
Doctor_J (36,392 posts)
47. "worst healthcare in the world because it's the best we can do"
Is that enough to get people to vote for your candidate? Because that's her healthcare plan.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:23 PM
longship (40,416 posts)
52. Not other, all of our allied democracies. ALL OF THEM!!
If one understands how insurance works and some basic statistics, single payer is a no brainier.
That is why nearly everybody else does it. Except for the USA. |
Response to longship (Reply #52)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 08:25 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
64. That's just not true though. France has 30% copays. Germany has private insurance
The Scandinavian countries have fairly high deductibles. Taiwan has fees at delivery. The Netherlands have private insurance. Australia has 25% copays. New Zealand dismantled its single payer system recently to replace it with a private insurance system.
Canada and the UK are very unusual in having health care that's actually free at delivery. |
Response to Recursion (Reply #64)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 08:43 AM
longship (40,416 posts)
66. You are correct.
However, none of these countries have solely made the private insurance companies the center of the program.
Single payer makes the most sense because it spreads the risk most equitably, which, after all, is what insurance is all about. Your point is correct, my friend. I stand corrected. However, one cannot escape the statistical truths behind single payer. ![]() |
Response to longship (Reply #66)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 08:49 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
67. You're right: they all made holding down provider costs the main part of it
Which for some reason our party simply refuses to look at much. Personally I like France's model: 30% copay for many treatments (but not preventive stuff on one end or critical interventions on the other), a private insurance market and public subsidies to cover that 30%, and much, much lower prices from providers (not just pharma, though that's a part of it: doctors, hospitals, labs, devices...)
|
Response to Recursion (Reply #67)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 08:59 AM
longship (40,416 posts)
68. As usual, we agree.
My favorite health plan is Canada, where everybody is covered for free. And the UK, which has a two tier system in which everybody is covered. Also, Taiwan.
That is the metric. Everybody gets healthcare, whether one can afford it or not. It has become a human right. My best to you, my friend. ![]() |
Response to Recursion (Reply #64)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:14 AM
Kentonio (4,377 posts)
71. It's not quite that simple in France
People on welfare don't pay any deductible and the 30% is often automatically covered by private schemes run by employers.
I was also told recently by a French doctor that France is changing to a more NHS like system very soon. |
Response to Kentonio (Reply #71)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:30 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
73. I can only fit so much on a subject line, but true
France's system has a lot of moving parts (I've posted about it here a lot, admiringly). But the basic concept is that the government limits costs, and pays 70% of them. And sure, there's an active private insurance market for the remaining 30%.
My central point remains that single payer is a means, not an end to itself. |
Response to Recursion (Reply #73)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:37 AM
Kentonio (4,377 posts)
74. There are certainly some things which the French system excels at
But it suffers from the French disease of being wildly over-complicated and bureaucratic. I think that's one of the primary reasons why they're trying to change to a simpler system, as well as moving their income tax system to a version of PAYE from next year.
I don't disagree on single payer as such, really the single payer part is just about getting better value from the health providers. How you construct the system around that principle is of course completely up for debate about how best suits each countries needs. |
Response to Kentonio (Reply #74)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:46 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
75. So why are *providers* the one part of this nobody will talk about?
German doctors start at €45K and literally legally max out at €88K. And we can't even get Congress to stop the "doctor fix", after 20 years.
|
Response to Recursion (Reply #75)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:49 AM
Kentonio (4,377 posts)
76. It needs to be talked about.
Although it's worth mentioning that if you take away the simple vast student loans doctors accumulate that would help sell the idea of a lower wage structure quite well I think. I know doctors who expect to still be paying off their loans into their 60's, which is just insanity.
Also there's no need for the private healthcare industry to be totally abolished. You can still have that avenue open to doctors without wage caps if they choose to take it. That's how it works in the UK. |
Response to Kentonio (Reply #76)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:51 AM
Recursion (56,552 posts)
78. Absolutely agree about the loans
It's part and parcel with the way Med school slots are artificially limited.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:24 PM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
53. Um uh because it demonstrably works with
better outcomes and lower costs.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:30 PM
tazkcmo (7,096 posts)
54. It's enough
to not vote for yours.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 08:35 PM
99Forever (14,524 posts)
55. Tell me there, uploopy.
Name just ONE nation in the world that is interested in changing from their Single Payer system to the fucking rigged game in the USA.
Just ONE. I won't be holding my breath waiting. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 11:11 PM
jeff47 (26,549 posts)
56. I really hope you keep using this line of attack.
Emphasizing that Clinton wants me to pay $10,000/year to insurance companies because "it's not a tax" is TOTALLY a winning platform. You should do nothing but shout it continuously.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 11:40 PM
MrMickeysMom (20,453 posts)
58. What of kindergarten analysis is THIS?
Perhaps you should get your hands on some peer reviewed research. For decades, it's been published internationally by groups inside and outside the U.S. Groups like Physicians for a National Health Program make this easy to read the archives.
Inform yourself, and perhaps you'll quit assuming this is a gimmick to get votes. The idea of single payer actually improves health care outcomes and costs significantly less. Under a single-payer system, all residents of the U.S. would be covered for all medically necessary services, including doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs. In order to not go broke over staying well, or dealing with a costly medical condition, a person should not have to BUY an insurance plan, only to be driven by high premiums or deductibles, which is based the cost of treating you only when you're sick, rather than covering routine health designed avoid emergent care. Most of the reason the middle class is strapped into so much debt is either due to the cost of health insurance, poor wage, and no time to take care of they and their families. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 12:08 AM
Avalux (35,015 posts)
59. Single payer because everyone, regardless of social status, deserves to live. n/t
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 09:50 AM
merrily (45,251 posts)
77. Silly. Not because other countries do it. Because the results are better with Medicare for All.
Both the medical outcomes and the financial outcomes.
|