Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

loyalsister

loyalsister's Journal
loyalsister's Journal
May 1, 2012

Feds: Sheltered Workshops May Violate Disabilities Act

This is so long overdue!!


The Obama administration is coming out in support of a group of adults with developmental disabilities who say they’re being relegated to sheltered workshops even though they’re capable of working in the community.....


Now, the Justice Department is weighing in saying that limiting people with disabilities to sheltered workshops is no different than segregating them in institutions.

“The unwarranted placement of persons with disabilities in sheltered workshops similarly perpetuates ‘unwarranted assumptions’ that such persons are ‘incapable or unworthy’ of working in competitive employment or interacting with non-disabled co-workers or customers,” wrote Justice Department attorneys in the statement of interest.

“Thus, the placement of persons with disabilities in segregated sheltered workshops on even a part-time basis, when they could be spending these hours working in the community with appropriate supports and services, is sufficient to state a claim under Title II (of the ADA) and the integration regulation,” federal officials continued.
Individuals with disabilities who are named in the suit have experience working in the community at McDonald’s, Safeway and other companies. Nonetheless, without supports they have no choice but to work at sheltered workshops where they earn less than the state minimum wage of $8.80 per hour, according to the initial complaint filed in January.


http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2012/05/01/feds-sheltered-violate/15511/
April 24, 2012

Having the Sisters’ Back

For all his faults, I'm glad to see support coming from this unlikely source. That he used the word "attack" is particularly encouraging to me. We need all the allies we can find when it comes to poverty, healthcare, etc AND in making clear that this attack on women is real.
It's a step in the right direction.

If you had a referendum on whom the best faith and moral teachers are in many local communities and parishes around the country, it would likely be the women who are now under attack.


http://sojo.net/blogs/2012/04/24/having-sisters’-back#.T5bko_CDfZw.twitter

Profile Information

Member since: Tue Apr 20, 2004, 10:45 AM
Number of posts: 13,390
Latest Discussions»loyalsister's Journal