Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorra

Zorra's Journal
Zorra's Journal
January 20, 2012

That's cuz Charlie Don't Surf



Charlie don't surf and we think he should
Charlie don't surf and you know that it ain't no good
Charlie don't surf for his hamburger Momma
Charlie's gonna be a napalm star

Everybody wants to rule the world
Must be something we get from birth
One truth is we never learn
Satellites will make space burn

We've been told to keep the strangers out
We don't like them starting to hang around
We don't like them all over town
Across the world we are going to blow them down

The reign of the super powers must be over
So many armies can't free the earth
Soon the rock will roll over
Africa is choking on their Coca Cola

It's a one a way street in a one horse town
One way people starting to brag around
You can laugh, put them down
These one way people gonna blow us down

Charlie don't surf he'll never learn
Charlie don't surf though he's got a gun
Charlie don't surf think that he should
Charlie don't surf we really think he should
Charlie don't surf

Charlie don't surf and we think he should
Charlie don't surf and you know that it ain't no good
Charlie don't surf for his hamburger Momma
Charlie don't surf

(1980, From the album Sandinista!, from The Clash)
January 20, 2012

Ouch. The Thatcher and Reagan era of hopelessness and despair.

I totally love Meryl Streep, she is a phenomenal master artist, and I would love to see her work in this film. Thanks for your eloquent review.

But, honestly, from my perspective as a lifetime progressive activist, I already know that I will not be able to stomach revisiting the awful nightmare of the hopelessness and despair of that era. It was like some insidious propaganda kicked in all at once, and numbed the hearts and minds of most of the western world.

Conservatives took it upon themselves to use wealth, deceit, and corruption to make a concerted sociopathic effort to retard collective human kindness and compassion, evolution and progress, environmental sanity, and basically every endeavor rooted in sincere human decency.

They succeeded. We would be light years ahead of where we are now in terms of truly human progress if it were not for conservatives taking love and squeezing it until it bled in their greedy fascist fists.

Just thinking about it makes me sad, and actually slightly nauseous. I hope the film does not glorify this era in any way.

In 1980, humanity came to a fork in the road, and chose the path to a dead end.


We are just now, 30+ years later, beginning to find the way home again.

Occupy.

January 15, 2012

I believe that he may possibly be doing the best he can within the boundaries of what he is

permitted to do under the authority of the 1%.

And when we say "megapolitics" we don't refer to the number of those who move in them. There are a few, very few, who find themselves in this "megasphere". Megapolitics globalizes national politics, in other words, it subjects it to a direction that has global interests (that for the most part are contradictory to national interests) and whose logic is that of the market, which is to say, of economic profit. With this economist (and criminal) criteria, wars, credits, selling and buying of merchandise, diplomatic acknowledgements, commercial blocks, political supports, migration laws, coups, repressions, elections, international political unity, political ruptures and investments are decided upon. In short the survival of entire nations.

The global power of the financial centers is so great, that they can afford not to worry about the political tendency of those who hold power in a nation, if the economic program (in other words, the role that nation has in the global economic megaprogram) remains unaltered. The financial disciplines impose themselves upon the different colors of the world political spectrum in regards to the government of any nation. The great world power can tolerate a leftist government in any part of the world, as long as the government does not take measures that go against the needs of the world financial centers. But in no way will it tolerate that an alternative economic, political and social organization consolidate. For the megapolitics, the national politics are dwarfed and submit to the dictates of the financial centers. It will be this way until the dwarfs rebel . .

http://struggle.ws/mexico/ezln/1997/jigsaw.html


And right now, the dwarfs are rebelling all over the planet.

Occupy
January 15, 2012

Blind faith in religion takes the ambiguity out of life/existence for conservatives.

Since they cannot tolerate gray areas, and basically everything has to be black and white in order to be tolerable for them, blind faith in religious book/religious leaders saves them from having to think. It's basically a matter of comfort and convenience for them.

"Why do I exist? Because the Grand Wazoo in the sky, or whatever the deity du jour is, made me, and sent me this book, or golden tablets, or a magical duck, whatever, to tell me what is true, so I don't really need to think about it anymore. So don't stress me out with all those disturbing questions about life, existence, truth, or the validity of authority. All my answers are right here in this book, and this book trumps all reason and logic, because the Grand Wazoo in the sky told us so, because it says so right here in this book. All scripture comes from the Grand Wazoo. And things really do go better with Coca-Cola."

I'm not saying that there is not a Creator, Love, Light, Life, Universe, what have you, I'm just saying few or no conservatives can really grasp this concept because a being of this nature would be basically too unknowable and scary to think about for a conservative, and therefore would create ambiguity. So they would prefer to believe in a book, because all they ever need is right there, down in black and white. That's why there is so much bible and koran , etc, worship going around.

Belief in and worship of a book helps quell the overwhelming, crippling, devastating fear of the unknown that exists in the consciousness of every RW conservative fundy. Consequently, the PTB preys on and perpetuates the fear in the conservative so that they will never break free and use their imagination to try to discern truth. Again, because they already have the "truth". All they ever really need to know is what is in their book. And it's questionable if they can even understand the real meaning of their own book, when the words in the book are processed through the darkened glass of their fear.

Conservatives are scared shitless of everything that is different, everything that they can't understand or control. Everything they do arises from fear. Rational, logical thinking by nature leads to using imagination to explore what is not known. So conservatives just don't go there. They don't need to. Everything has already been thought out for them. It says so right there in the book, and the book is the ultimate unquestionable truth. Amen.

I totally agree, stillwaiting. The PTB knows this, and uses religion as a mass opiate for controlling conservatives, and subsequently, uses their enslaved conservatives to control us. The non-logic, non-reason of the regressive conservative counters the logic and and reason of the progressive liberal. The PTB knows how to use this ancient formula to gain, maintain, and create a status quo of their power and control over others. It's how democracies are consistently prevented from existing and evolving. It's how they convince people that claim to believe in a peace preaching Jesus to mindlessly go to war for them in order to make them wealthier and more powerful. It's the philosophy of Caesar's, Machiavelli's, Leo Strauss's, etc. They all have the smug sense of privilege, righteousness of their greed, and belief in their superiority over others, that only an insatiable overinflated ego stoked by conscienceless sociopathy can bestow.

This is where the spontaneous arisal of Occupy and Anonymous comes in. The ancient struggle of the progressive/liberal to overcome the authoritarian PTB and create a wide sense of human community has evolved in mass consciousness as a way to overcome the control of the PTB. The ideas of a growing and evolving collective will and consciousness cannot be controlled or destroyed by the aggressions of the PTB and their flying monkeys, and this consciousness is at this moment in process of removing them from all relevance as a block on human evolution and the spread of reason, kindness, compassion, and love.

Religious conservatism and political conservatism naturally go hand in hand. The same boundary and motivator that regulates the thoughts and actions of the political conservative also regulates the thoughts and actions of the religious conservative.

Overwhelming, paralyzing fear.


Researchers help define what makes a political conservative

BERKELEY – Politically conservative agendas may range from supporting the Vietnam War to upholding traditional moral and religious values to opposing welfare. But are there consistent underlying motivations?

Four researchers who culled through 50 years of research literature about the psychology of conservatism report that at the core of political conservatism is the resistance to change and a tolerance for inequality, and that some of the common psychological factors linked to political conservatism include:

Fear and aggression
Dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity
Uncertainty avoidance
Need for cognitive closure
Terror management

"From our perspective, these psychological factors are capable of contributing to the adoption of conservative ideological contents, either independently or in combination," the researchers wrote in an article, "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition," recently published in the American Psychological Association's Psychological Bulletin.

http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml






January 12, 2012

Anti-Same Sex Marriage Amendments are State Sponsored Bullying.

The Republican RW fundamentalist schoolyard bullies are at work once again, insisting that their self-selected religious beliefs allow them to trample the rights of others, and that these beliefs justify the action of denying others their natural equal human rights.

These State House bullies deny and/or attempt to deny and/or limit the equality and human rights of others through hate legislation that has the collateral effect of perpetuating the falsehood that LGBT persons are not equal or acceptable. This in turns leads to continued repeated bullying of, and assaults on, lgbt persons, lgbt child and adult depression, and schoolyard bullying that sometimes even causes children to take their own lives in despair.

The egos of these hateful State House Bullies are so swollen with self-righteousness that they would legislate their misguided, religion inspired beliefs into law, despite the fact that they cause widespread unwarranted harm and misery to a multitude of innocent people.

They put a whole new meaning on the term "Bully Pulpit".

Maybe a better term would be "Hate Pulpit".

Let's not start the year by taking rights away from people

On Jan. 1, New Hampshire celebrated the second anniversary of its legalization of gay marriage. You can be excused if you didn't notice.
---
It's hard to believe some Republicans in the State House are working hard to outlaw such marriages.
---
Soon the House will vote on a bill to take away these rights and repeal same-sex marriage. In 2011 the Judiciary Committee had a day-long hearing where we heard testimony by many hundreds of people concerning HB 437. The overwhelming majority spoke passionately in favor of marriage equality. Unfortunately, the Republican majority on the Judiciary Committee passed the bill onto the full House.

HB 437 not only would prohibit same-sex marriage, it would allow discrimination against people in civil unions. Any individual or any entity that claimed religious or moral beliefs against civil unions would not be penalized for "refusing to provide services, employment, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods or privileges."

http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/301971/lets-not-start-the-year-by-taking-rights-away-from-people?SESSa7865a4399460ca1103fd56da90588d9=google

What is wrong with these people is translates into many things that are is wrong with our country. And a glaring example of who we need to remove from our govenment so that societal progress in all areas is no longer senselessly obstructed because of hatred and ignorance.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:

“Now, there is still, as you all know, much more to be done to secure that commitment, that reality, and progress for all people. Today, I want to talk about the work we have left to do to protect one group of people whose human rights are still denied in too many parts of the world today. In many ways, they are an invisible minority. They are arrested, beaten, terrorized, even executed. Many are treated with contempt and violence by their fellow citizens while authorities empowered to protect them look the other way or, too often, even join in the abuse. They are denied opportunities to work and learn, driven from their homes and countries, and forced to suppress or deny who they are to protect themselves from harm.

“I am talking about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, human beings born free and given bestowed equality and dignity, who have a right to claim that, which is now one of the remaining human rights challenges of our time. I speak about this subject knowing that my own country’s record on human rights for gay people is far from perfect. Until 2003, it was still a crime in parts of our country. Many LGBT Americans have endured violence and harassment in their own lives, and for some, including many young people, bullying and exclusion are daily experiences. So we, like all nations, have more work to do to protect human rights at home.

“Now, raising this issue, I know, is sensitive for many people and that the obstacles standing in the way of protecting the human rights of LGBT people rest on deeply held personal, political, cultural, and religious beliefs. So I come here before you with respect, understanding and humility. Even though progress on this front is not easy, we cannot delay acting. So in that spirit, I want to talk about the difficult and important issues we must address together to reach a global consensus that recognizes the human rights of LGBT citizens everywhere.

“The first issue goes to the heart of the matter. Some have suggested that gay rights and human rights are separate and distinct; but, in fact, they are one and the same. Now, of course, 60 years ago, the governments that drafted and passed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights were not thinking about how it applied to the LGBT community. They also weren’t thinking about how it applied to indigenous people or children or people with disabilities or other marginalized groups. Yet in the past 60 years, we have come to recognize that members of these groups are entitled to the full measure of dignity and rights, because, like all people, they share a common humanity."


If anyone ever wants to know why I am still, and have always been, a Democrat...well, there you have it.
January 11, 2012

My thoughts? Yeh, some people act like ignorant jerks sometimes.

It's totally not gender dependent. Women are not any better than men. We are not sugar and spice and everything nice.

We're only human, just like men.

I believe that men and women have differences that often make communication between genders difficult at times.

It's probable that these apparent differences are related to chromosomal/physical differences and/or growing up in very different societal/cultural environments and "roles".

In modern times, it seems that we are slowly learning how to bridge these apparent differences.

Yelling at each other will not further the progress of productive communication and subsequent understanding between genders whatsoever.

This thread is primarily intended as a catalyst for the consideration of why women historically, and presently as well, have not been viewed by men, and very often not viewed by women themselves, as being human beings with the equal standing, rights, and privileges as men.

I have learned a great deal of new information from the diverse and valuable input from the posters on this thread, and I believe that it is already helping me understand better how I might possibly communicate more effectively with men, and women as well.

(It can also be related to the current struggle for LGBT equality as well. One thing that history consistently shows us is that those who prevent/try to prevent others from manifesting their natural rights and equality are totally on the wrong side of history).

I don't have the answers; I don't dislike men because of this phenomenon, that would be pointless. It is what it is. I believe that the more we understand about how and why this phenomenon exists, the easier it will become for men and women to effectively and productively communicate with each other, and, as a result, live together equally and more harmoniously.

It is very difficult for us to get a real grasp on the present if we don't know the circumstances and events that got us here. Not knowing anything about the past is like a person waking up after being in a coma for 40 years. A person like this knows little about the past. Their concept of the present will have very little context. They will have no past experience from which to negotiate existence, make decisions, and communicate with others.

Maybe, if men and women both better understand where we came from, and how we got here, we will be able to communicate more productively and compassionately with each other now and in the future.

BTW, I also love horses and dogs.

But I love people, too.

peace

January 10, 2012

Hmmm. "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."- Wm. Shakespeare,

Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 222–230

Whatever.

Cute outfit, interesting accessories...maybe a bit over the top.



Doesn't it seem hypocritical, and isn't it puzzling, how the leader of the organization that once brought us the Inquisition, the Crusades, and all the other very unsavory things they did throughout their history can so confidently assert that same sex marriage threatens human dignity and the future of mankind itself? Go figure.

But then again, I think I get it.

Everyone makes mistakes. But to continue to make the same mistakes, in this case by once again so arrogantly assuming knowledge of absolute truth and unquestionable correctness of action leading to doing great harm to large numbers of innocent people once again, is inexcusable.

More innocent blood will be spilled, more lives will be destroyed, more children will suffer, as these unfounded, unwarranted, illogical, and unreasonable beliefs about lgbt persons are perpetuated by ultra-conservative RW religious fanatics claiming absolute knowledge of the will of the Creator, and then actively harming others on the basis of this untruth, an untruth that they claim as their divine knowledge and hegemonic right.

I imagine it's still just a question of genuine core values.


People can believe what they want to believe. That's fine. When people start taking away other's rights and causing unwarranted harm to others because of their beliefs, that is not fine. This is why separation of church and state is so absolutely critical to human freedom and liberty.

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Current location: Earth
Member since: Tue Sep 23, 2003, 11:05 PM
Number of posts: 27,670

About Zorra

http://www.democraticunderground.com/avatars/rainbowcandle.gif
Latest Discussions»Zorra's Journal