Moore's complaint is really sad but reflects the belief that the GOP considers all votes by non-whites to be fraudulent https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/for-gop-all-black-vote-is-fraud/?rf=1
Mr. Moores court filing ran for dozens of pages, and it argued that returns in Jefferson County, the states most populous county, confirmed election fraud. It also said that turnout in the county was suspiciously high; it suggested that Mr. Jones had benefited from voter intimidation; and it argued that Mr. Moores opponents had spread lies and fraudulent misrepresentations.
For Moore and his supporters, the black vote just seems fraudulent. Not fraudulent in a way that can be supported by any evidentiary standard, but these people look at the black vote as a prima facie indication of voter fraud. If you pan the camera back from Alabama, youll find millions and millions of white people who simply cant understand the black vote. Those white people think massive, systemic voter fraud is a likely explanation. Those white people also think Occams Razor is made by Gillette......
Republicans have no desire to actually encourage black people to vote for them they dont want black people in their party beyond mere tokenism (hi Tim Scott, you keep shining those shoes and Im sure bossman McConnell will have your committee chairmanship just as soon as he can). There is no outreach, there is no even basic understanding of the issues that face black America. I promise you there isnt a Republican strategist who could even EXPLAIN whats going on between Cornel West and Ta-Nehisi Coates, much less devise a strategy to position Republican candidates on one side or the other.
I am tired of the GOP using the claim of voter fraud to try to suppress the vote. I am glad that Moore's lawsuit was rejected
Putin is not getting the return on his investment that he expected http://thehill.com/opinion/international/366455-for-putin-trumps-presidency-has-not-lived-up-to-expectations
Indeed, in December 2017 the U.S. imposed new sanctions on Russia and selected individual Russian elites for violating the INF treaty and under the terms of the newly enacted Global Magnitsky Law.
The administration also published a new National Security Strategy forthrightly accusing Russia of intervening in the U.S. elections and portraying as an aggressor and threat to European if not global security, announced the first steps in providing Ukraine with weapons to defend against Russian aggression, and forcefully intensified the reinforcement of NATO forces in Europe and overall ties with European allies.
Needless to say, all of these moves aroused enormous anger and frustration in Moscow even though Putin formally claims that Russia still seeks partnership with the U.S. or at least cooperation on issues of mutual concern and interest.
This commission is a joke. It seems that the court will not let the GOP and Kobach to exclude Democrats from activities of this so-called commission https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/22/trump-voter-fraud-committee-democrat-access-318433
President Donald Trump's commission investigating voter fraud must give one of its Democratic members access to more of the panel's records, a federal judge ruled Friday night.
U.S. District Court Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap appeared to have been denied documents needed to be an active player in the deliberations of what is formally known as the President's Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.
"Plaintiff has a right, as a commissioner, to 'fully participate' in the proceedings of the Commission. In the Courts view, his assertion that he will be unable to fully participate without the information contained in relevant documents that the Commission has not shared with the public has merit," wrote Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of President Bill Clinton.
The judge said she was issuing an injunction to prevent "dysfunction" at the commission, but her effort to keep the panel on track may be too little, too late. The group held its last meeting in September and officials have said it will not meet again this year.
Mark Jones, political science fellow at Rice Universitys Baker Institute, says those filings set a record for the number of Democratic challengers in an era of Republican dominance, and are a departure from 2016 when eight Republican-held congressional seats went uncontested by Democrats.
We are seeing a groundswell of unusually high support and mobilization among progressive Democrats who are really angered by the Trump administration, Jones said.
But, Democrats arent just gunning for congressional seats. According to preliminary numbers from the Texas Democratic Party, Democrats are running in 89 percent of the seats in the Texas House and 88 percent of the seats in the Texas Senate. Both are the highest percentages the party has mustered since at least 1992.
There have been cycles where a number of congressional seats and large percentage of Texas state house seats were not contested.
this makes me smile https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/12/alabama-senate-democrats-jones-293496
Despite publicly remaining mum on the race, the Democratic National Committee spent nearly $1 million on the contest while dispatching and funding 30 aides here, a party official told POLITICO. That push came just as Jones sought to distance himself from the national party and win over conservatives.
It was a politically delicate move. Jones detractors have tried painting him as a tool of the national party, so Democrats in Washington have tried treading carefully in order to avoid leaving too much of a footprint in a state where Democrats havent won a Senate seat in over two decades. The effort paid off: Jones prevailed Tuesday.
But the DNC and other national Democrats have also come under fire from critics this year for their perceived lack of involvement in other special elections, so the committee has been eager to chip in.
From Prof. Hasen's election law blog https://electionlawblog.org/?p=96376
Under 40, the ones who can contest are: The election of any person declared elected to the office of Governor, Secretary of State, Auditor, Treasurer, Attorney General, Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries, Public Service Commissioner, senator or representative in the Legislature, justices of the Supreme Court, judges of the courts of appeals, judge of the circuit court or district court, or any office which is filled by the vote of a single county, or to the office of constable.
Section 47 only allows a contest of any person declared to be elected to the office of senator or representative in the Legislature, judge of the circuit court or district court, any office which is filled by the vote of a single county, or constable.
Moore is not those. I think unless theres another provision Im not seeing he cannot get a recount if it is outside the 0.5% margin.
Vince is a good Democrat and a member of the Harris County Democratic Lawyers Association
Profile InformationMember since: Mon Apr 5, 2004, 03:58 PM
Number of posts: 142,610
- 2024 (487)
- 2023 (2291)
- 2022 (3356)
- 2021 (1741)
- 2020 (1117)
- 2019 (859)
- 2018 (738)
- 2017 (102)
- 2016 (83)
- 2015 (42)
- 2014 (103)
- 2013 (68)
- 2012 (28)