Fiendish Thingy
Fiendish Thingy's JournalHave any of those arrested in Portland been arraigned/indicted yet?
Ive read that 18 protestors were arrested and are still in custody pending arraignment on federal charges including failure to disperse and destruction of property.
I ask this because:
1) In order to file charges, doesnt there have to be a report from the arresting officer? That officer would have to be named, as would any other officers listed as witnesses or assisting in the arrest.
2) the arrest and court records would available to the public, would they not?
3) the leak of the memo from Chad stating his troops are not trained In crowd control could be used as a Defense.
4) the fact that as acting director of DHS, Chads term has exceeded the 210 day limit prescribed by law - so, wouldnt he have no authority to direct his stormtroopers, and thus their presence would be unlawful?
We will soon see if there is any serious attempt at using the courts to prosecute protestors, in which case, I think the People will gain the upper hand.
Adam Schiff details the essential steps to repairing government institutions post-Trump
Hes got my vote for Speaker once Pelosi retires in 2022.
The CT that has been posted over the weekend is that Trump will challenge the popular vote
In several swing states, and that the republican legislatures will refuse to certify the electors, but, as has been noted, it doesnt work that way in many/most states.
The CT also stipulates that Trump will declare a state of emergency due to the fraud in order for the DOJ to investigate/interfere with the SOS certification of popular vote tallies, which trigger the appointment of electors in many places, in the hopes of throwing the election to the House, where each state gets one vote.
While Trump/Barr may attempt such a strategy, I doubt it has much chance of succeeding. For one, the streets would fill with protestors who would make recent marches look like picnics, and this uncertainty would also cause the markets to crash. Trump/Barr would only have about 5weeks to interfere with the appointment of electors in the four states the CT claims would be challenged, which the CT claims would prevent either candidate from getting to 270, and throw the election to the house.
Not so fast.
The 12th amendment states:
So on January 10 (IIRC), the new Congress unseals and counts the ballots from electors who were appointed and cast their ballots on Dec. 14. The winner is whoever has a majority of electoral votes among the those votes sent to the House for certification. The only time it goes to the house is if there is a tie, or if 3 or more candidates split the electors and none have a majority. With a two way election, that is not mathematically possible (maybe thats why Kanye declared his candidacy )
Trump could block the appointment of electors in all 50 states, and the 3 from DC would then decide the election.
Profile Information
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 12:00 PMNumber of posts: 15,568