Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

babylonsister's Journal
babylonsister's Journal
January 24, 2020

David Corn: The Main Trump Super-PAC Is Covering Up Its Own Role in the Impeachment Scandal


2 hours ago
The Main Trump Super-PAC Is Covering Up Its Own Role in the Impeachment Scandal
A conspiracy theory, a chronology, and a con.
David Corn
Washington, DC, Bureau ChiefBio | Follow


The number-one super-PAC for Donald Trump, which is expected to raise tens of millions of dollars to help re-elect him this year, has come up with a nifty fundraising gimmick: the “Witch Hunt Timeline”. This interactive chronology supposedly details “the road to a sham impeachment” to show how a phony Russia scandal turned into a phony Ukraine scandal that turned into a phony impeachment. But this is a highly selective timeline, and in a bout of Trump-sized chutzpah, America First Action leaves out at least one crucial episode: its own role in the Ukraine scandal.

In a fear-mongering email seeking donations, the super-PAC claims that Trump is a victim of a nefarious and wide-ranging plot, insisting that “federal law enforcement officers, intelligence agencies, and government bureaucrats engaged in a shocking effort to influence the 2016 election, crush the Trump campaign, and cripple our elected president.” The timeline, it asserts, “follows the genesis and development of the deep state’s Witch Hunt against President Donald J. Trump, a monstrous conspiracy against the American people and the American system of government.” Yeah, that again—and it’s part of another rightwing buck-raking scam.

This alternative-reality con job is not being mounted by a group of GOP schmoes or wannabes. This super-PAC is run by the the cream of Trump World. It is chaired by Linda McMahon, who was Trump’s pick to run the Small Business Administration. Its senior adviser and spokesperson is Sean Spicer, Trump’s first White House press secretary. Kelly Sadler, formerly a senior Trump White House official in charge of coalitions outreach, is the communications director for the group. Steve Cortes, another adviser for this super-PAC, has been a member of Trump’s Hispanic Advisory Council.

It raised $39 million for the 2018 elections to support pro-Trump Republicans, and in Trumpistan, it is the Trump-approved place to go for donors who want to give big-bucks for Trump’s reelection. It had over $10 million cash in the bank as of last June, the latest data available. But that amount will likely swell by several times as the election approaches. As a super-PAC, it is supposed to act independently of Trump’s official reelection campaign. But its affiliated non-profit, America First Policies, which last month announced it was spending $2 million on anti-impeachment ads, was cofounded by Brad Parscale, who is now Trump’s campaign manager.

The timeline ignores many significant moments of Trump’s Russia and Ukraine scandals. Gone are key contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians in 2016. There’s nothing on Trump’s secret endeavors during that campaign to score a deal in Moscow to develop a tower that could earn him hundreds of millions of dollars (while telling voters he had “nothing” to do with Russia). Trump’s denials that Russia was attacking the US election? Nope, not there. The release of Russian-stolen Democratic emails just when the grab-them-by-the-pussy tape emerged? They forgot that, too. The timeline neglects to mention that the US intelligence community concluded Moscow attacked the 2016 election in part to help Trump win the White House. (Interest declared: the timeline does note the story I posted on October 31, 2016, that first revealed the existence of what would become known as the Steele dossier and that disclosed the FBI’s interest in the allegations they contained. Somehow, presumably, that was part of a Deep State operation.)

The timeline indicates this Trump super-PAC suffers from selective amnesia. Especially regarding one incriminating incident.

more...

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/01/the-main-trump-super-pac-is-covering-up-its-own-role-in-the-impeachment-scandal/
January 24, 2020

The Doomsday Clock is now at "100 seconds to midnight." Here's what that means.

Here's some cheery news.

The Doomsday Clock is now at “100 seconds to midnight.” Here’s what that means.
Climate change, nuclear war, accelerating technology, and incompetent leadership threaten us.
By Kelsey Piper Jan 23, 2020, 5:00pm EST



The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was founded in 1945 by researchers who worked on the atomic bomb. It publishes research on “manmade existential threats such as nuclear war, climate change, and disruptive technologies.”

And lately, it’s been a little bit, well, doomsaying. Its famous extinction clock has hovered for the last few years at “two minutes to midnight” — as pessimistic a future as it predicted in 1953 during the volatile early Cold War.

On Thursday, the group moved the clock again, announcing that we are “100 seconds to midnight.” The change from minutes to seconds is a bit awkward, but it solves an important problem for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: while the world does seem to be getting more dangerous, the danger mostly isn’t imminent (global civilization is overwhelmingly likely to survive the year 2020), and the Bulletin likely wants the ability to have some granularity in its risk assessments from one year to the next year.

The overall assessment that accompanied the 100-second clock unveiling is a gloomy one. All of the problems we faced last year are still facing us, and we have less time than ever to solve them. Both nuclear war and catastrophic effects from climate change, the Bulletin argues, grew more dangerous in 2019 — and world leaders made things worse.

“This situation — two major threats to human civilization, amplified by sophisticated, technology-propelled propaganda — would be serious enough if leaders around the world were focused on managing the danger and reducing the risk of catastrophe,” the Bulletin statement read. “Instead, over the last two years, we have seen influential leaders denigrate and discard the most effective methods for addressing complex threats — international agreements with strong verification regimes — in favor of their own narrow interests and domestic political gain.”


The result, the group argues, is that we’re closer to doomsday than we’ve ever been.

more...

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/1/23/21079028/climate-change-extinction-nuclear-war-ai-existential-risk-doomsday-clock
January 24, 2020

Rude Pundit: Republicans Believe the US Is So Weak That It Couldn't Handle Removing Trump


The Rude Pundit
Proudly lowering the level of political discourse
1/23/2020
Republican Believe the United States Is So Weak That It Couldn't Handle Removing Trump from Office


There are so many arguments that Republicans make regarding the impeachment of Donald Trump that range from blatant bullshit to explosive diarrhea. The laughably hypocritical cries of "Democrats hate this president" are lost every time Trump himself calls Democrats "traitors" who "hate the United States" and are "radical left" "socialists." And, yes, we all remember how Republicans acted like a lynch mob when it came to Barack Obama. So, you know, go fuck each other with your "hate" accusation.

The one that pisses me off more than any other is that "Democrats want to overturn the 2016 election." On the most basic level, this is utterly and completely false. We don't rewind to November 2016 and declare Hillary Clinton the winner. Goddamn Mike Pence becomes president. Every judge fisted through Mitch McConnell's Senate sphincter still has their job, including odious cuntfleas Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Shit, everyone Trump appointed would probably be safer in their jobs than if Trump remains president. And, frankly, Republicans are more obsessed with 2016 now than Democrats are because they know, they fucking know, that Trump's victory is illegitimate and they have to do everything in their power to not let that fact become viral.

But even beyond, you know, facts, there is an insult to the American people in the assertion that somehow Trump's impeachment and removal from office would so upset Americans that they couldn't take it. It's like they want us to think that, for some reason, Donald fuckin' Trump, who is an overloaded garbage barge in an ill-fitting suit, is so intrinsic to the existence of the United States that the republic would crumble without him. And, surely, some of his most loyal chuds would have to learn to live without the center of their universe, but they can hock all that MAGA gear for cash for more oxy to ease the pain.

You know what would happen if Trump were removed? We'd all fucking breathe a sigh of relief, even a whole lot of Republicans. It'd be like the guards at the end of the film The Wizard of Oz after the Wicked Witch is melted, when the previously cruel men bow down and thank Dorothy for ridding them of her. Jesus, we'd all treat Adam Schiff like a god for freeing us.

more...

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2020/01/republican-believe-united-states-is-so.html
January 24, 2020

Republican Senators Admit Trump Doesn't Know What He's Talking About

https://www.politicususa.com/2020/01/23/republican-senators-admit-trump-doesnt-know-what-hes-talking-about.html


Posted on Thu, Jan 23rd, 2020 by Jason Easley
Republican Senators Admit Trump Doesn’t Know What He’s Talking About


Former Sen. Claire McCaskill said that Republican Senators tell her that Trump has no idea what he is talking about.

McCaskill said on MSNBC, “I mean, that’s the thing about the Republican senators in that chamber, they know this guy doesn’t know whit about public policy. You should hear stories they tell when they come back from meetings at the White House. I have Republican senators tell me they were in a meeting at the White House with the president on health care and it was clear he had no idea what he was talking about. I mean, what, just yesterday, he does a meeting with the Iraqi leader — Of the Kurdistan in Iraq. And he starts talking about safe zones in Syria. He doesn’t even know the difference. So the notion that he is drilled down in Ukraine and is trying to implement public policy, nobody in that chamber believes it.”


https://twitter.com/i/status/1220520803084750848

Republican Senators know that Trump is lying. They know that his actions toward Ukraine have nothing to do with public policy because Trump knows nothing and doesn’t care about public policy.

Yet, Republicans are going to vote to not convict and remove this president from office.

Every single Republican Senator who votes not to convict Trump is an accomplice to his crimes and must face the verdict of the voters in their home states in November.
January 24, 2020

Republicans complain about the impeachment trial's lack of new evidence while blocking new evidence



Republicans complain about the impeachment trial’s lack of new evidence while blocking new evidence
Republicans are using an astoundingly self-refuting talking point to lay the groundwork for Trump’s acquittal.
By Aaron Rupar@atrupar Jan 23, 2020, 5:10pm EST


As Democratic impeachment managers made the case against President Donald Trump on Wednesday and Thursday, Republican senators rolled out a rationale for their future vote to acquit: that the trial is a waste of time because Democrats aren’t presenting new evidence.

“So far what [head impeachment manager Adam Schiff] has said we’ve heard before,” said Mike Braun (IN) on Wednesday. “I didn’t hear anything new today. We’ll see,” added Pat Toomey (PA). Rick Scott (FL), alluding to the lack of new evidence, repeatedly characterized the trial as “boring” during TV interviews.

But on Tuesday night, every Republican senator took vote after vote to block impeachment managers from gathering new documents and compelling witness testimony. So Republicans are complaining about Democrats not doing something they’re preventing them from doing.

This point was made succinctly by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY) during a news conference held just before Wednesday’s hearing.

“What are the Republicans saying? Well, they’re saying they heard nothing new. But these Republicans voted nine times on Tuesday against amendments to ensure new witnesses and new documents,” he said. “The same Republicans saying they heard nothing new just voted nine times to hear nothing new.”


more...

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/23/21078993/impeachment-trial-republican-talking-points-new-evidence
January 24, 2020

Overcoming the challenge of up-is-down, day-is-night politics

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/overcoming-the-challenge-down-day-night-politics#break


Overcoming the challenge of up-is-down, day-is-night politics
01/23/20 11:28 AM—Updated 01/23/20 11:49 AM
By Steve Benen


There’s a video making the rounds online this morning of Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) fielding a question from a reporter about Donald Trump’s Ukraine scandal. This was the most notable part of the exchange:

REPORTER: So you’re saying that it’s okay for a President to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political rival and withhold foreign aid to coerce him into doing so?

BRAUN: No, I’m not saying that’s okay. I’m not saying that’s appropriate. I’m saying that it DIDN’T HAPPEN.


For those familiar with the basic elements of the controversy, this seems like a deeply embarrassing incident for the freshman Republican senator. But part of the reason the video is making the rounds is that Braun himself is promoting it. The GOP Hoosier is proud of what he said and how he said it.

And that’s unfortunate because Braun’s assertions have no basis in reality. We know the president asked foreign leaders to investigate a domestic rival because he did so, on camera, while standing on the south lawn of the White House. We also know Trump withheld foreign aid in order to coerce a foreign leader because there’s a mountain of documentary evidence – not to mention a recent GAO report and a confession from the White House chief of staff – that definitely proves that it happened.

snip//

But I once again find myself thinking anew about former Rep. Earl Landgrebe (R-Ind.), who refused to break with Richard Nixon, even at the height of Watergate, even after many other Republicans had come to terms with the fact that their corrupt president would have to resign in disgrace.

“Don’t confuse me with the facts,” Landgrebe said the day before Nixon’s resignation. “I’ve got a closed mind. I will not vote for impeachment. I’m going to stick with my president even if he and I have to be taken out of this building and shot.”


The difference between 1974 and 2020 is simple: nearly a half-century ago, Landgrebe was one of a tiny minority. Now, Congress is filled with a few too many Earl Landgrebes.
January 24, 2020

Fox News Keeps Telling Its Viewers That Impeachment Is Too Boring to Watch

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/fox-news-tells-viewers-donald-trump-impeachment-too-boring-to-watch

Impeachment
Fox News Keeps Telling Its Viewers That Impeachment Is Too Boring to Watch
CNN and MSNBC are largely sticking with the Senate trial, while some Trump-boosting anchors are using airtime to mock Adam Schiff’s appearance.
By Caleb Ecarma
January 23, 2020


While CNN and MSNBC aired much of Trump’s impeachment trial live during prime-time hours, the alternative-media universe of Fox News concocted a perfect narrative to avoid doing the same: Americans aren’t watching because impeachment—the third in U.S. history—is simply too dull, and the ending—Donald Trump’s acquittal by the Republican-controlled Senate—is predictable. So why bother airing the lead-up?

“If you watch some of it—there were snippets, and we’re showing you the good stuff—it was unbelievably boring, and I don’t know how people can follow it,” said Fox & Friends cohost Steve Doocy on Wednesday, after a night in which his network largely opted for its regular programming over live impeachment coverage. Ainsley Earhardt then concluded that “the majority of people” didn’t follow the proceedings, instead turning to them “to summarize it…because it was so long.” While the network did run Rep. Adam Schiff’s Wednesday opening statement in full, the broader message is clear: Cover your eyes, this will all be over soon—and, in the meantime, we’ll take care of you. The following morning, Doocy took a victory lap for his network’s refusal to air, using the collective “we” to declare Trumpworld “won.” “Our prime-time didn’t [cover it],” said Brian Kilmeade, noting that the network’s two top-rated hosts, Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, didn’t pick it up. Carlson went so far as to apologize for the few minutes of airtime he allowed for live impeachment proceedings, while Hannity, who airs the top-rated show in all of cable news, concluded that only “a terrible host” would force their audience to endure the “never-ending babbling” and “repetitive talking points.”


That’s just a sampling of the defensive strategy concocted by some of the president’s favorite TV hosts. At other points, Fox instead aired segments on Hunter Biden’s drug habits, or handicapped live coverage by restricting it to a small, muted screen dubbed over with MyPillow ads, or featured hosts bashing rival cable outlets for airing the trial uninterrupted. It’s classic Fox News feedback loop: The network insists that the American people are disengaged with impeachment, so they don’t have to cover it; meanwhile their choice not to do so keeps viewers in the dark.

In the same vein, various Fox hosts argued that Democrats aren’t presenting anything new at the trial, so what’s the point in covering it? “If we look, there’s really no new facts here,” Hannity remarked Tuesday night, while GOP lawmaker turned pundit Jason Chaffetz pushed the same refrain on Thursday morning, saying the trial has “nothing to do with proving the facts” because there is “no new evidence.” Of course, Republicans—assisted by the president’s legal team, which was virtually plucked from the Fox News greenroom—are doing everything they can to block new witnesses and evidence—the very elements of the trial that might be considered newsworthy.

All of which raises the question: What commentary is so important as to be aired in lieu of Trump’s trial? “The real reason why they are impeaching him [is] these are all really boring people up against a phenomenally interesting person,” opined Fox News’s Greg Gutfeld, after his show, The Five, cut away from the first day of House managers’ arguments. The program’s other impeachment analysis included Jesse Watters, a 41-year-old man who still pops his polo collars, taking shots at Schiff’s appearance, saying he “looks like a rotten dandelion” and accusing him of tucking “his T-shirt into his mom jeans.” Tucker Carlson made a similar jab, claiming the House Intel chairman did not have “a single friend in high sch
January 23, 2020

An Impeachment Trial Without Witnesses Would Be Unconstitutional

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/impeachment-trial-without-witnesses-would-be-unconstitutional/605332/?fbclid=IwAR3q-bijeLIShzFRWM5cXNdasjtEeWYCtuCPNhwV3BuT_6_JfsF3QW3_7Qk

The Battle for the Constitution
An Impeachment Trial Without Witnesses Would Be Unconstitutional
And a resulting acquittal verdict would present Americans with something far worse than a constitutional crisis.
6:00 AM ET
Paul Savoy

snip//

If the impeachment process conducted by the Senate is unconstitutional, the unavailability of either criminal prosecution or a legitimate impeachment trial as a means of presidential accountability, according to the OLC opinion’s own reasoning, would “subvert the important interest in maintaining ‘the rule of law.’”

An unconstitutional verdict of acquittal would present Americans with something far worse than a constitutional crisis. The nation will have blundered its way into creating an accidental autocracy governed by a president who, even if not reelected, would remain in office until January 20, 2021, beyond the reach of the rule of law.

“Wherever law ends, tyranny begins,” John Locke cautioned in his Two Treatises of Government. This is how autocracy comes to America: not with a declaration of martial law and tanks in the street, but by a roll-call vote in the Senate whipped by the leader of the Senate in violation of the Constitution.

If on the day the Senate returns its verdict, history records the failure to convict the president following a trial without witnesses, that will be the day the rule of law dies in America. The courts will remain open for business. Congress will be in session. Citizens will still be able to vote. And a free press will continue to launch withering attacks on President Trump. But the American people will no longer be living in a constitutional democracy.


This story is part of the project “The Battle for the Constitution,” in partnership with the National Constitution Center.
January 23, 2020

The Rude Pundit: Random Observations on a Cover-Up (Impeachment Trial Rules Edition)

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2020/01/random-observations-on-cover-up.html

The Rude Pundit
Proudly lowering the level of political discourse
1/22/2020
Random Observations on a Cover-Up (Impeachment Trial Rules Edition)


1. Early yesterday (well, early for me), I made a prediction that democracy's maggot, Mitch McConnell, would allow for some changes in his ludicrously stringent rules for the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump. I said that he would give in on the timeline of the opening statements, which were a punishing 24 hours over 2 days for each side, and on the admittance of evidence from the House investigation, which was going to require a vote on every piece introduced. I thought that it would come in a vote on an amendment from the Democrats, but, instead, McConnell made the changes (three days and accepting all evidence unless there is objection) before anything got started. This was the bone he tossed to give cover to the so-called "moderates," Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney, and Corey Gardner, along with the retiring Lamar Alexander. It will be the only ground McConnell gives. The fix is in so deeply that it would be impossible to pull it out of the clenched anus of the GOP.

2. Yes, you're right. Democratic House managers were incredible yesterday. They were so well-prepared, so eloquent, so passionate about the sanctity of the country, so filled with magnificent retorts and one-liners. It was the kind of ass kicking that even a barely literate electorate would watch, think, "Holy shit, Trump is just a motherfucker and so are these Republican motherfuckers in the Senate," and rise up to shut shit down until all Republicans were all chased out of town. But we are civic illiterates now, just hoping that we can live and die without anyone downvoting our Reddit comments.

3. Yes, you're right. Trump's legal team acted like a bunch of drunk frat douches (including fucking corrupt Pam Bondi) who knew their dads had already paid off the dean to make sure they get good grades so they can play on the lacrosse team this semester. They railed and ranted at the Democrats, accusing them of everything from hypocrisy to flat-out murdering the founders. They heaped praise on Trump, because of course they did. They talked shit and shit lies. They did everything but actually address a single fact. And they won't. They're giving a book report without having read the book. And they know they can do it because Mitch McConnell has already promised that this is a big fuckin' show that they're forced to go through because of that goddamn Constitution, which he can't actually rip up but would if he could.

4. We know how this ends. We know that the likelihood that there will be witnesses is the same likelihood that McConnell's face muscles will function like a normal human being's. And any conviction has the same probability that Lindsey Graham will remove his tongue from Donald Trump's asshole. The GOP does not have honorable people. They are cowards and punks and bitches and worms, dead frightened that Trump will say something fucked-up about them and unleash his bot and bastard online army to threaten to rape their dogs.

5. So if we know the outcome, then what's the game about? It's about 2020, obviously. It's about winning the Senate. It's about peeling away as many putative independents to tell Collins and Gardner to shove their moderation up their Trump-humping peeholes. The message should be as clear as possible: We're impeaching Trump now because he was trying to fuck with the 2020 election. If we waited until after the election, he'd have fucked with it. And Susan Collins and Mitch McConnell and the rest wanted his criminal ass to get away with it.

5a. Oh, and by the way, Trump still doesn't believe there was interference on his behalf in 2016, and McConnell has refused to do a goddamn thing to protect our elections.

5a. This is where the near-complete abandonment of the Mueller Report hurts Democrats. They could forcefully assert that Trump's attempt to get dirt on Biden was part of a pattern of soliciting foreign interference. But Democrats ended up allowing Trump and pudgy doom muffin William Barr set the terms of discussion of the report.

6. So we're getting a bullshit exercise in futility with this trial. But you should absolutely pass around clips of Hakeem Jeffries reaming Jay Sekulow. You should tell everyone about what a cockknob Pat Cipollone is. And you should campaign for whatever Democrats promise to burn the GOP to the ground and piss on the ashes.
January 23, 2020

America Is Watching By Connie Schultz

https://www.creators.com/read/connie-schultz/01/20/america-is-watching?fbclid=IwAR0802WQiH96NrU-tc2kMDBrhDgjgHyqsmF_oY_5zO086qzibbRH1V6VBOw

America Is Watching
By Connie Schultz
January 23, 2020

snip//

Around midnight on the first night of the trial, I posted on Facebook and Twitter that Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff was right: It seemed that Republicans were hoping that, by dragging this out into the wee hours of the mornings, most Americans were no longer watching.

Nearly a thousand responded, after midnight, and their message was virtually universal:

"I'm watching."


And not just on the West Coast. They were watching in Ohio and Pennsylvania, in New Jersey and Maine, in Minnesota and Kansas. Many said that what they missed, they would watch on their DVRs. "Some of us have to work," one person wrote, "but I watch when I can."

Schedules were changed, bedtimes abandoned. It's what a patriot does.

Republicans have done all they could to thwart a fair trial. At the end of it, they will have their say.

American voters will have the final word.

And they've been watching.

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Hometown: NY
Home country: US
Current location: Florida
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 09:54 PM
Number of posts: 171,057
Latest Discussions»babylonsister's Journal