Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
kpete
kpete's Journal
kpete's Journal
October 1, 2018
COONS: I would think so. (via CBS)
VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1046580512821792769
Q: If Judge Kavanaugh is shown to have lied to the Committee, nomination's over? FLAKE: Oh yes.
COONS: I would think so. (via CBS)
VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1046580512821792769
September 30, 2018
https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1046513030924828672
Former Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's goes on the record to describe him as a belligerent drunk.
https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1046513030924828672
September 30, 2018
...His outrage, his strategy, his fate: All of it was about beer. Beer as a symbol of his normalcy. Beer as an emblem of his all-American maleness.
He was painting himself as a martyr for that maleness, and he was using beer along with weight lifting, football, flatulence jokes and what he mendaciously insisted were inoffensive yearbook high jinks to do it. Beer was his brand, and he was proud of it...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/29/opinion/brett-kavanaugh-beer-politics.html
The "I like beer judge."
...His outrage, his strategy, his fate: All of it was about beer. Beer as a symbol of his normalcy. Beer as an emblem of his all-American maleness.
He was painting himself as a martyr for that maleness, and he was using beer along with weight lifting, football, flatulence jokes and what he mendaciously insisted were inoffensive yearbook high jinks to do it. Beer was his brand, and he was proud of it...
What I dont like is his selective frankness and the red-faced righteousness with which he, the supposedly sober-minded jurist, rushed to the fault lines of gender, culture and class. He made camp there and stoked the fire as high as it would go and as hot as it would burn. He brought a cooler of beer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/29/opinion/brett-kavanaugh-beer-politics.html
September 30, 2018
The guy who insisted that
That guy thinks the scrutiny of his own sexual past is just revenge on behalf of the Clintons, plural. Not just Hillary for as he explicitly mentions President Trump and the 2016 election. But also Bill Clinton, the man whom Kavanaugh demanded describe details of his use of sex toys and enjoyment of blowjobs under oath, and perhaps even Chelsea, the young girl who had to watch her parents be humiliated before the entire nation.
In spite of Kavanaughs suggestion that this imagined campaign would have consequences for decades, his admission that it might be revenge means it must be revenge for something. For something done to the Clintons. Hillary. And Bill.
For a guy who is unashamed about using stolen emails, the notion that he considers this revenge for Hillary is troubling enough. If this is revenge, it is revenge for Hillary being wronged during the 2016 election, and a big part of that wrong was using stolen emails. And Kavanaugh is no more embarrassed about using stolen emails than the guy who appointed him.
Kavanaugh suggests, in the same breath, that Hillary was wronged, but that denying him a seat on the Supreme Court, even for behavior that resembles that wrong, would be an outrage, even if his nomination was due entirely to the fact that she was wronged.
Brett Kavanaugh is not going to quit, no matter if his entire nomination is illegitimate because Hillary was wronged.
Perhaps more plausibly, Kavanaughs use of the plural, Clintons, suggests he thinks this is revenge for his own actions 20 years ago, his own demand that a man and his family be publicly humiliated.
But, again, if this is revenge, it suggests what happened to Clinton the insistence that Bill confess under oath to Kavanaugh about cumming into Monicas mouth was itself wrong.
And once again, Brett Kavanaugh, the guy whose career was launched by demanding to hear the sordid details of sex under oath, does not care. Kavanaugh does not care that (as David Brock laid out early in this process) he himself set a perjury trap for Clinton, laying the foundation for a crazed national political crisis and an unjust impeachment over a consensual affair. He may recognize this as revenge and in so doing acknowledge that it is akin to the coordinated campaign he wrongly assumes is amassed against him, but he does not care that Democrats are (he imagines) adopting his own playbook.
In using that word revenge and imagining that Democrats are exacting revenge for both the Clinton impeachment and the use of corrupt means as a means of winning the 2016 election, Kavanaugh admits that hes just getting a taste of the medicine he once administered. But his response to that is not to take a step back from the edge of the abyss that he himself created (and imagines himself to be standing on), take a step back with the recognition that he himself is not immune from his own tactics, but instead to complete the next logical step, the adoption of those same measures on the highest court of the land.
Never mind that by imagining credible questions about his past treatment of women is solely about the Clintons strips the agency of the millions of women trying to prevent abusers from again getting promoted in spite of it.
Kavanaugh, wrongly, thinks this is revenge for tactics he pioneered long ago. Having faced those tactics and discovered how painful they are, he has doubled down.
More plus links:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/30/kavanaughs-tell-revenge-on-behalf-of-the-clintons-plural/
KAVANAUGH'S TELL: "REVENGE ON BEHALF OF THE CLINTONS," PLURAL
by emptywheel
Theres a part of Brett Kavanaughs bombastic statement Thursday that has stuck with me, because it reveals the foundational logic of his statement indeed, his entire candidacy for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.
After complaining about how the nomination has destroyed his family, he accuses a shady, largely fictional, mirror image of the Right Wing Noise Machine of seeking revenge.
This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election. Fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons. and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.
This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades. This grotesque and coordinated character assassination will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions, from serving our country.
The guy who insisted that
I am strongly opposed to giving the President any break in the questioning regarding the details of the Lewinsky relationship unless before questioning on Monday, he either (i) resigns or (ii) confesses perjury and issues a public apology to [sexual assault cover-up expert Ken Starr].
That guy thinks the scrutiny of his own sexual past is just revenge on behalf of the Clintons, plural. Not just Hillary for as he explicitly mentions President Trump and the 2016 election. But also Bill Clinton, the man whom Kavanaugh demanded describe details of his use of sex toys and enjoyment of blowjobs under oath, and perhaps even Chelsea, the young girl who had to watch her parents be humiliated before the entire nation.
In spite of Kavanaughs suggestion that this imagined campaign would have consequences for decades, his admission that it might be revenge means it must be revenge for something. For something done to the Clintons. Hillary. And Bill.
For a guy who is unashamed about using stolen emails, the notion that he considers this revenge for Hillary is troubling enough. If this is revenge, it is revenge for Hillary being wronged during the 2016 election, and a big part of that wrong was using stolen emails. And Kavanaugh is no more embarrassed about using stolen emails than the guy who appointed him.
Kavanaugh suggests, in the same breath, that Hillary was wronged, but that denying him a seat on the Supreme Court, even for behavior that resembles that wrong, would be an outrage, even if his nomination was due entirely to the fact that she was wronged.
Brett Kavanaugh is not going to quit, no matter if his entire nomination is illegitimate because Hillary was wronged.
Perhaps more plausibly, Kavanaughs use of the plural, Clintons, suggests he thinks this is revenge for his own actions 20 years ago, his own demand that a man and his family be publicly humiliated.
But, again, if this is revenge, it suggests what happened to Clinton the insistence that Bill confess under oath to Kavanaugh about cumming into Monicas mouth was itself wrong.
And once again, Brett Kavanaugh, the guy whose career was launched by demanding to hear the sordid details of sex under oath, does not care. Kavanaugh does not care that (as David Brock laid out early in this process) he himself set a perjury trap for Clinton, laying the foundation for a crazed national political crisis and an unjust impeachment over a consensual affair. He may recognize this as revenge and in so doing acknowledge that it is akin to the coordinated campaign he wrongly assumes is amassed against him, but he does not care that Democrats are (he imagines) adopting his own playbook.
You may defeat me in the final vote, but youll never get me to quit. Never.
In using that word revenge and imagining that Democrats are exacting revenge for both the Clinton impeachment and the use of corrupt means as a means of winning the 2016 election, Kavanaugh admits that hes just getting a taste of the medicine he once administered. But his response to that is not to take a step back from the edge of the abyss that he himself created (and imagines himself to be standing on), take a step back with the recognition that he himself is not immune from his own tactics, but instead to complete the next logical step, the adoption of those same measures on the highest court of the land.
Never mind that by imagining credible questions about his past treatment of women is solely about the Clintons strips the agency of the millions of women trying to prevent abusers from again getting promoted in spite of it.
Kavanaugh, wrongly, thinks this is revenge for tactics he pioneered long ago. Having faced those tactics and discovered how painful they are, he has doubled down.
More plus links:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/30/kavanaughs-tell-revenge-on-behalf-of-the-clintons-plural/
September 30, 2018
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/29/opinion/sunday/fury-is-a-political-weapon-and-women-need-to-wield-it.html
Wondering if you have the right to be as angry as you feel? YES-YES-YES You are allowed & compelled
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/29/opinion/sunday/fury-is-a-political-weapon-and-women-need-to-wield-it.html
September 30, 2018
If He Gets This Angry Answering Questions on National TV...
September 30, 2018
https://twitter.com/ellenbyrne/status/1046398382191915008
And Yes, The World Is Watching...
My nephew saw this in Shoreditch, London this morning, Sept 30.https://twitter.com/ellenbyrne/status/1046398382191915008
September 30, 2018
https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1046165420154261505
Dan Rather: "By limiting scope...WH is daring press to shed more light on what's lurking in shadows"
https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1046165420154261505
September 30, 2018
Trump & Kim in Love...
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Sep 17, 2004, 03:59 PMNumber of posts: 71,981