uppityperson
uppityperson's JournalFun video for this surreal day. Nothing to do with politics
My name is uppityperson and I'm an addict
I keep checking trump's twitter to see if he has gotten access again.
Seattle Times endorses Hillary! Good write-up to share, addresses False Equivalency crap
I am glad to read this because they take the "both are flawed" thing and go on to state repeatedly why to vote for Hillary, why to not vote for Trump. For most of us the reasons address apparent. But for those who might vote for him, this is great recommendation as to why not.
http://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/editorials/the-times-recommends-hillary-clinton-the-only-choice-for-president/
Both candidates are flawed. But one of them, Republican nominee Donald Trump, poses an enormous risk to Americas prosperity, security and stability.
Clinton, the Democrats nominee, clearly has the experience, knowledge and temperament needed to maintain and improve Americas standing at home and abroad.
Yes, we need more outsiders and candor in politics. That does not justify electing an unqualified candidate whose policies and behavior contradict the values of most Washingtonians and Americans, Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals.....
Donald Trump Statement on Leaked Video Clip (omg)
Second debate in a row that Trump complains a mike didn't work for him
Read off on the twitter
I'm getting SO tired of the simplistic "things need to change" crap
Because yes, they do but that avoids the huge issue of change for the better or worse.
Things are changing, though slowly. Do you really want to make the change back to what got us in the base economic problems? Or do you want to continue the too slow change to getting better?
I guess too many want simple slogans vs thought. It's frustrating and I hope Donnie continues his vile public.
"We need change" but not too make things worse. I am tired and will be glad to not hear Donnie again.
I hadn't realized we had a Trump smilie
Link to debate transcripts, 1 with fact checking annotations
This one is better written.
http://fortune.com/2016/09/26/presidential-debate-transcript/
This one has fact checking annotations.
http://www.npr.org/2016/09/26/495115346/fact-check-first-presidential-debate
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayMember since: Sat Oct 16, 2004, 11:10 PM
Number of posts: 115,677