does so well in caucuses and not so well in voting states?

It doesn't make any sense does it?

easy to flip electronic votes comparatively?

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president

Alaska B. Sanders
81.6%


H. Clinton
18.4%


Washington

B. Sanders
73.6%

H. Clinton
26.1%

At the coliseum, Seats 10,000

He filled that when he was here last July!

If you look at the delegates awarded tonight in AZ (vote in so far)


Winner H. Clinton
60.6%

196,617 45
B. Sanders

36.9%
119,798 17

45 Clinton 17 Sanders

and divide them into the vote

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president

you would get 7000 votes per delegate for Sanders

And 4350 votes per delegate for Clinton.

What seems democratic about this?

Cable is Terror terror terror 24/7!

And she stressed to me that it was important to call and email Ron Johnson to allow the Supreme court nomination process to go forward.

So have at it!


I just did.

http://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/public/

Does someone want to cross post this in GD?

Clinton 35,699

Sanders 34,355

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president

Clinton 476,253

Sanders 420,030

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president

this will be a good place to track results coming in throughout the night!

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president

[IMG][/IMG]

Knock one out of the park for Bernie. Maybe it will hit Rahm in the head